Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:59:25.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Divisibility Properties of Graded Domains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

D. D. Anderson  and
David F. Anderson
D. D. Anderson
Affiliation:
The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
David F. Anderson
Affiliation:
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let R = ⊕α∊гRα be an integral domain graded by an arbitrary torsionless grading monoid Γ. In this paper we consider to what extent conditions on the homogeneous elements or ideals of R carry over to all elements or ideals of R. For example, in Section 3 we show that if each pair of nonzero homogeneous elements of R has a GCD, then R is a GCD-domain. This paper originated with the question of when a graded UFD (every homogeneous element is a product of principal primes) is a UFD. If R is Z+ or Z-graded, it is known that a graded UFD is actually a UFD, while in general this is not the case. In Section 3 we consider graded GCD-domains, in Section 4 graded UFD's, in Section 5 graded Krull domains, and in Section 6 graded π-domains.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , 01 February 1982 , pp. 196 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1982

References

1. Anderson, D. D., π-domains, over rings, and divisor ial ideals, Glasgow Math. J. 19 (1978), 199–203.Google Scholar
2. Anderson, D. D. and Matijevic, J., Graded ir-rings, Can. J. Math. 31 (1979), 449–457.Google Scholar
3. Anderson, D. F., Graded Krull domains, Comm. in Algebra 7 (1979), 79–106.Google Scholar
4. Anderson, D. F. and Ohm, J., Valuations and semi-valuations of graded domains, Math. Ann. 256 (1981), 145–156.Google Scholar
5. Chouinard, L. G. II, Krull semigroups and divisor class groups, to appear in Can. J. Math.Google Scholar
6. Cohn, P. M., Bezout rings and their subrings, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 64 (1968), 251–264.Google Scholar
7. Fossum, R. M., The divisor class group of a Krull domain (Springer-Verlag, 1973.Google Scholar
8. Gilmer, R., Multiplicative ideal theory (Marcel Dekker, 1972.Google Scholar
9. Gilmer, R. and Parker, T., Divisibility properties in semigroup rings, Michigan Math. J. 21 (1974), 65–86.Google Scholar
10. Johnson, J. L., The graded ring R[X1 … , Xn], Rocky Mtn. J. Math. 9 (1979), 415–424.Google Scholar
11. Kaplansky, I., Commutative rings (Allyn and Bacon, 1969.Google Scholar
12. Lam, T. Y., Serre's conjecture, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 635 (Springer-Verlag, 1978.Google Scholar
13. Matijevic, J., Three local conditions on a graded ring, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 205 (1975), 275–284.Google Scholar
14. Matsuda, R., On algebraic properties of infinite group rings, Bull. Fac. Sci. Ibaraki Univ., Series A. Math. 7 (1975), 29–37.Google Scholar
15. Matsuda, R., Infinite group rings. II, Bull. Fac. Sci. Ibaraki Univ., Series A. Math. 8 (1976), 43–66.Google Scholar
16. Matsuda, R., Torsion-free abelian group rings. Ill, Bull. Fac. Sci. Ibaraki Univ., Series A. Math. 9 (1977), 1–49.Google Scholar
17. Matsuda, R., Torsion-free abelian semigroup rings. IV, Bull. Fac. Sci. Ibaraki Univ., Series A. Math. 10 (1978), 1–27.Google Scholar
18. Matsuda, R., Torsion-free abelian semigroup rings. V, Bull. Fac. Sci. Ibaraki Univ., Series A. Math. 11 (1979), 1–37.Google Scholar
19. Mott, J. L., The group of divisibility and its applications, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 311 (Springer-Verlag, 1973), 194–208.Google Scholar
20. Northcott, D. G., A generalization of a theorem on the content of polynomials, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 55 (1959), 282–288.Google Scholar
21. Northcott, D. G., Lessons on rings, modules and multiplicities (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1968).Google Scholar