Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T01:20:54.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Hilbert-Schmidt Property for Embedding Maps between Sobolev Spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Colin Clark*
Affiliation:
The University of British Columbia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let H0m(Ω) denote the so-called Sobolev space consisting of functions denned on a region Ω in n-dimensional Euclidean space, which together with their generalized derivatives of all orders ⩽m belong to , and which vanish in a certain sense on the boundary ∂Ω. (Precise definitions are given in the next section.) For each pair m, k of non-negative integers the inclusion H0m+k(Ω) ⊂ H0m(Ω) defines a natural “embedding” map. For the case of a bounded region Ω it is well known that these maps are completely continuous, and even, for sufficiently large k, of Hilbert-Schmidt type. We have discussed complete continuity in the case of unbounded regions in an earlier paper; here we consider conditions on Ω which imply the Hilbert-Schmidt property for embeddings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1966

References

1. Bers, L., John, F., and Schechter, M., Partial differential equations (New York, 1964).Google Scholar
2. Browder, Felix E., On the spectral theory of elliptic differential operators. I, Math. Ann., 142 (1961), 22130.Google Scholar
3. Clark, Colin, An embedding theorem for function spaces, to appear in Pacific J. Math.Google Scholar
4. Maurin, Krzysztof, Abbildungen vom Hilbert-Schmidtschen Typus und ihre Anwendungen, Math. Scand., 9 (1961), 359371.Google Scholar
5. Molcanov, A. M., On conditions for the discreteness of the spectrum of a self-adjoint differential, equation of second order (Russian), Trudi Mosk. Mat. Obshchestva, 2 (1953), 169200.Google Scholar