Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:54:05.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Homology Operations Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Z. Fiedorowicz  and
J. P. May
Z. Fiedorowicz
Affiliation:
Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
J. P. May
Affiliation:
The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There are two principal kinds of input data for infinite loop space theory, namely E∞ spaces à la Boardman-Vogt [3] and May [7] and Γ-spaces à la Segal [14]. May and Thomason [13] introduced a common generalization and used it to prove the equivalence of the output obtained from these two kinds of input.

This suggests that any invariants of one kind of input should have analogs for the other. Homology operations are among the most basic invariants of E∞ spaces, and we here establish the analogous invariants for Γ-spaces. The definition is transparently obvious from the point of view of the common generalization but is at first sight rather surprising and unnatural from the point of view of Γ-spaces alone. Probably for this reason, there is no hint of the possibility of a direct definition of homology operations for Γ-spaces in the literature.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , 01 June 1982 , pp. 700 - 717
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1982

References

1. Adams, J. F., Infinite loop spaces, Annals of Math. Studies 90 (Princeton, 1978.Google Scholar
2. Araki, S. and Kudo, T., Topology of Hn-spaces and H-squaring operations, Mem. Math. Fac. Sci. Kyusyu Univ. Ser. A. 10 (1956), 85–120.Google Scholar
3. Boardman, J. M. and Vogt, R. M., Homotopy invariant algebraic structures on topological spaces, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 34–7 (Springer, 1973.Google Scholar
4. Cohen, F. R., Lada, T. J. and May, J. P., The homology of iterated loop spaces, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 533 (Springer, 1976.Google Scholar
5. Dyer, E. and Lashof, R. K., Homology of iterated loop spaces, Amer. J. Math. 84 (1962), 35–88.Google Scholar
6. Fiedorowicz, Z. and Priddy, S. B., Homology of classical groups over finite fields and their associated infinite loop spaces, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 647 (Springer, 1978.Google Scholar
7. May, J. P., The geometry of iterated loop spaces, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 271 (Springer, 1972.Google Scholar
8. May, J. P., EM spaces, group completions, and permutative categories, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Series 11 (1974), 61–94.Google Scholar
9. May, J. P., (with contributions by Ray, N., Quinn, F. and Tørnehave, J.), Ex ring spaces and E∞ ring spectra, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 577 (Springer, 1977.Google Scholar
10. May, J. P., The spectra associated to permutative categories, Topology 17 (1978), 225–228.Google Scholar
11. May, J. P., Pairings of categories and spectra, J. Pure and Applied Algebra 19 (1980), 299–346.Google Scholar
12. May, J. P., Multiplicative infinite loop space theory, J. Pure and Applied Algebra, to appear.Google Scholar
13. May, J. P. and Thomason, R. W., The uniqueness of infinite loop space machines, Topology 17 (1978), 205–224.Google Scholar
14. Segal, G., Categories and cohomology theories, Topology 13 (1974), 293–312.Google Scholar
15. Thomason, R. W., Homotopy colimits in the category of small categories, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 85 (1979), 91–109.Google Scholar
16. Woolfson, R., Hyper-Y-spaces and hyper spectra, Quart. J. Math. Oxford (2), 30 (1979), 229–255.Google Scholar