Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:54:00.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Matrix Summability of Geometrically Dominated Series

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

G. H. Fricke  and
J. A. Fridy
G. H. Fricke
Affiliation:
Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio
J. A. Fridy
Affiliation:
Kent State University, Kent, Ohio
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

One of the common uses of summability theory is found in its applications to power series. A partial listing such as [l]-[5], [13], and [15]-[17] might serve to remind us of the many instances of summability theory applied to power series. In some studies, the summability transformation is applied to the sequence of partial sums of the power series, while in others it is applied to the general term akzk as a series-to-series transformation. In [2] and [5] the transformation is applied to the coefficient sequence of the Taylor series. In the present study we investigate matrix transformations that are applied to the sequence {akzk), but we are not concerned with the usual preservation of convergence or sums. At a point within its disc of convergence, a power series exhibits more than ordinary convergence; it converges very rapidly, being dominated by a convergent geometric series.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , 01 June 1987 , pp. 568 - 582
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1987

References

1. Agnew, R. P., Summability of power series, Amer. Math. Monthly 53 (1946), 251–259.Google Scholar
2. Brown, H. I., Entire methods of summation, Comp. Math. 21 (1969), 35–42.Google Scholar
3. Cowling, V. F., Summability and analytic continuation, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 1 (1950), 536–542.Google Scholar
4. Dienes, P., The Taylor series (Dover, New York, 1957).Google Scholar
5. Fricke, G. and Powell, R. E., A theorem on entire methods of summation, Comp. Math. 22 (1970), 253–259.Google Scholar
6. Fridy, J. A., Mercerian-type theorems for absolute summability, Port. Math. 33 (1974), 141–145.Google Scholar
7. Fridy, J. A., Absolute summability matrices that are stronger than the identity mapping, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 47 (1975), 112–118.Google Scholar
8. Fridy, J. A., Abel transformations into l1 Can. Math. Bull. 25 (1982), 421–427.Google Scholar
9. Fridy, J. A. and Roberts, K. L., Some Tauberian theorems for Euler and Borel summability, Internat. J. Math. & Math. Sci. 3 (1980), 731–738.Google Scholar
10. Hardy, G. H., Divergent series (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1949).Google Scholar
11. Knopp, K., Theory and application of infinite series (Blackie & Son, London, 1928).Google Scholar
12. Knopp, K. and Lorentz, G. G., Beiträge zur absolut en Limitierungen, Arch. Math. 2 (1949), 10–16.Google Scholar
13. Okada, Y., Über die Annaherung and analytischer Funktionen, Math. Zeit. 23 (1925), 62–71.Google Scholar
14. Powell, R. E. and Shah, S. M., Summability theory and its applications (Van Nostrand Reinhold, London, 1972).Google Scholar
15. Riesz, M., Sur les séries de Dirichlet et les entières, Comp. Rend. 149 (1909), 909–912.Google Scholar
16. Riesz, M., Über einen Satz des Herrn Fatou, Crelle J. 14 (1911), 89–99.Google Scholar
17. Tomm, Ludwig, A regular summability method which sums the geometric series to its proper value in the whole complex plane, Can. Math. Bull. 26 (1983), 179–188.Google Scholar