Article contents
On a Generalization of Alternative Rings
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Bruck and Kleinfeld [3] proved that any alternative ring with characteristic prime to 2 must satisfy the identity
where the associator (x,y,z) is defined by (x, y, z) = (xy)z – x(yz) and . Linearization of the identity (x2, y, z) = 2x · (x, y, z) yields for characteristic prime to 2 an equivalent identity
(1)
Using the right alternative law (x, y, z) = –(y, x, z) and the flexible law (x, y, z) = –(z, y, x) which is satisfied in any alternative ring we obtain
(2)
and
(3)
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1970
References
1.
Albert, A. A., Power-associative rings, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.
64 (1948), 552–593.Google Scholar
3.
Bruck, R. H. and Kleinfeld, E., The structure of alternative division rings, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.
2 (1951), 878–890.Google Scholar
4.
Kleinfeld, E., Kosier, F., Osborn, J. M., and Rodabaugh, D. J., The structure of associator dependent rings, Arch. Math.
13 (1962), 203–212.Google Scholar
5.
Kosier, F., A generalization of alternative rings, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.
112 (1964), 32–42.Google Scholar
6.
Rodabaugh, D. J., On the Wedderburn principal theorem, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.
138 (1969), 343–362.Google Scholar
7.
Schafer, R. D., An introduction to nonassociative algebras (Academic Press, New York, 1966).Google Scholar
You have
Access
- 1
- Cited by