Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T23:17:29.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Relation Between [f, g] and Aλ Summability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Joaquin Bustoz*
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

First we will briefly define the [f, g] and Aλ summability methods. Let K = {w : |w| < 1}. T. H. Gronwall [3] introduced a general class of summability methods each of which involves a pair of functions f and g with the following properties. The function z = f (w) is analytic on \{1}, continuous and univalent on , with f (0) = 0, f (1) = 1, |f(w)| < 1 if w ∊ K. The inverse function w = f-1(z) is analytic on f (K)\{1}, and at z = 1

1.1

where γ ≧ 1, a > 0, and the quantity in brackets is a power series in 1 — z with positive radius of convergence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1974

References

1. Borwein, D., On a scale of Abel-type summability methods, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 52 (1957), 318322.Google Scholar
2. Bustoz, J. and Wright, D., On Gronwall summability, Math. Z. 125 (1972), 177183.Google Scholar
3. Gronwall, T. H., Summation of series and conformai mapping, Ann. of Math. 33 (1932), 101117.Google Scholar
4. Kwee, B., On absolute de la Vallée Poussin summability, Pacific J. Math. 42 (1972), 689693.Google Scholar
5. Szasz, O., On products of summability methods, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1952), 257263.Google Scholar