Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:11:06.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reducibility of the Principal Series for (F) over a p-adic Field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Christian Zorn*
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, U.S.A., e-mail: czorn@math.ohio-state.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let ${{G}_{n}}=\text{S}{{\text{p}}_{n}}\left( F \right)$ be the rank $n$ symplectic group with entries in a nondyadic $p$-adic field $F$. We further let ${{\tilde{G}}_{n}}$ be the metaplectic extension of ${{G}_{n}}\,\text{by}\,{{\mathbb{C}}^{1}}=\left\{ z\in {{\mathbb{C}}^{\times }}|\,|z|=1 \right\}$ defined using the Leray cocycle. In this paper, we aim to demonstrate the complete list of reducibility points of the genuine principal series of ${{\tilde{G}}_{2}}$. In most cases, we will use some techniques developed by Tadić that analyze the Jacquet modules with respect to all of the parabolics containing a fixed Borel. The exceptional cases involve representations induced from unitary characters $\chi $ with ${{\chi }^{2}}=1$. Because such representations $\pi $ are unitary, to show the irreducibility of $\pi $, it suffices to show that ${{\dim}_{\mathbb{C}}}\,\text{Ho}{{\text{m}}_{{\tilde{G}}}}\left( \pi ,\,\pi \right)\,=\,1$ . We will accomplish this by examining the poles of certain intertwining operators associated to simple roots. Then some results of Shahidi and Ban decompose arbitrary intertwining operators into a composition of operators corresponding to the simple roots of ${{\tilde{G}}_{2}}.$ We will then be able to show that all such operators have poles at principal series representations induced from quadratic characters and therefore such operators do not extend to operators in $\text{Ho}{{\text{m}}_{{{{\tilde{G}}}_{2}}}}\left( \pi ,\,\pi \right)$ for the $\pi $ in question.

Keywords

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2010

References

[1] Ban, D., The Aubert involution and R-groups. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 35(2002), no. 5, 673–693. doi=10.1016/S0012-9593(02)01105-9Google Scholar
[2] Ban, D., Linear independence of intertwining operators. J. Algebra 271(2004), no. 2, 749–767. doi=10.1016/j.jalgebra.2002.11.004 doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2002.11.004Google Scholar
[3] Bernstein, I. N. and Zelevinsky, A. V., Representations of the group GLn(F), where F is a local non Archimedean field. Uspehi Mat. Nauk 31(1976), no. 3(189), 5–70.Google Scholar
[4] Bernstein, I. N. and Zelevinsky, A. V., Induced representations of p-adic groups. I. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 10(1997), no. 4, 441–472.Google Scholar
[5] Bump, D., Automorphic forms and representations. Cambride Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 55, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.Google Scholar
[6] Casselman, W., Introduction to the theory of admissible representations of p-adic reductive groups. http://www.math.ubc.ca/-cass/research/pdf/p-adic-book.pdf Google Scholar
[7] Flicker, Y. and Kazhdan, D., Metaplectic correspondence. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 64(1986), 53–110.Google Scholar
[8] Kudla, S., On the local theta-correspondence. Invent. Math. 83(1986), no. 2, 229–255. doi=10.1007/BF01388961 doi:10.1007/BF01388961Google Scholar
[9] Kudla, S., On the local theta correspondence. Notes from the European School of Group Theory, Beilngries (1996). http://www.math.toronto.edu/-skudla/castle.pdf Google Scholar
[10] Kudla, S., Rapoport, M., and Yang, T., Modular forms and special cycles on Shimura curves. Annals of Mathematics Studies, 161, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2006.Google Scholar
[11] Ranga Rao, R., On some explicit formulas in the theory of Weil representation. Pacific J. Math. 157(1993), no. 2, 335–371.Google Scholar
[12] Shahidi, F., On certain L-functions. Amer. J. Math. 103(1981), no. 2, 297–355. doi:10.2307/2374219Google Scholar
[13] Silberger, A. J., Introduction to harmonic analysis on reductive p-adic groups. Mathematical Notes, 23, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1979.Google Scholar
[14] Springer, T. A., Reductive groups. In: Automorphic forms, representations and L-functions Part 1, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXIII, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
[15] Tadić, M., Representations of classical p-adic groups. In: Representations of Lie groups and quantum groups, Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics, 311, Longman Sci. Tech., Harlow, 1994, pp. 129–204.Google Scholar
[16] Tadić, M., Jaquet modules and induced representations. Math. Commun. 3(1998), no. 1, 1–17.Google Scholar
[17] Tadić, M., On reducibility of parabolic induction. Israel J. Math. 107(1998), 29–91. doi=10.1007/BF02764004 doi:10.1007/BF02764004Google Scholar