Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
An odd unbounded (respectively,   $p$ -summable) Fredholm module for a unital Banach
 $p$ -summable) Fredholm module for a unital Banach   $*$ -algebra,
 $*$ -algebra,   $A$ , is a pair
 $A$ , is a pair   $(H,D)$  where
 $(H,D)$  where   $A$  is represented on the Hilbert space,
 $A$  is represented on the Hilbert space,   $H$ , and
 $H$ , and   $D$  is an unbounded self-adjoint operator on
 $D$  is an unbounded self-adjoint operator on   $H$  satisfying:
 $H$  satisfying:
(1)   ${{(1+{{D}^{2}})}^{-1}}$  is compact (respectively, Trace
 ${{(1+{{D}^{2}})}^{-1}}$  is compact (respectively, Trace   $\left( {{\left( 1+{{D}^{2}} \right)}^{-(p/2)}} \right)<\infty $ , and
 $\left( {{\left( 1+{{D}^{2}} \right)}^{-(p/2)}} \right)<\infty $ , and
(2)   $\{a\in A|\,\,[D,a]\,\,\text{is}\,\,\text{bounded}\}\text{ }$  is a dense
 $\{a\in A|\,\,[D,a]\,\,\text{is}\,\,\text{bounded}\}\text{ }$  is a dense   $*$ - subalgebra of
 $*$ - subalgebra of   $A$ .
 $A$ .
If   $u$  is a unitary in the dense
 $u$  is a unitary in the dense   $*$ -subalgebra mentioned in (2) then
 $*$ -subalgebra mentioned in (2) then
  $$uD{{u}^{*}}=D+u[D,{{u}^{*}}]=D+B$$
 $$uD{{u}^{*}}=D+u[D,{{u}^{*}}]=D+B$$
where   $B$  is a bounded self-adjoint operator. The path
 $B$  is a bounded self-adjoint operator. The path
  $$D_{t}^{u}:=(1-t)D+tuD{{u}^{*}}=D+tB$$
 $$D_{t}^{u}:=(1-t)D+tuD{{u}^{*}}=D+tB$$
is a “continuous” path of unbounded self-adjoint “Fredholm” operators. More precisely, we show that
  $$F_{t}^{u}:=D_{t}^{u}{{\left( 1+{{\left( D_{t}^{u} \right)}^{2}} \right)}^{-\frac{1}{2}}}$$
 $$F_{t}^{u}:=D_{t}^{u}{{\left( 1+{{\left( D_{t}^{u} \right)}^{2}} \right)}^{-\frac{1}{2}}}$$
is a norm-continuous path of (bounded) self-adjoint Fredholm operators. The spectral flow of this path   $\left\{ F_{t}^{u} \right\}$  (or
 $\left\{ F_{t}^{u} \right\}$  (or   $\{D_{t}^{u}\}$ ) is roughly speaking the net number of eigenvalues that pass through 0 in the positive direction as
 $\{D_{t}^{u}\}$ ) is roughly speaking the net number of eigenvalues that pass through 0 in the positive direction as   $t$  runs from 0 to 1. This integer,
 $t$  runs from 0 to 1. This integer,
  $$\text{sf}\left( \left\{ D_{t}^{u} \right\} \right):=\text{sf}\left( \left\{ F_{t}^{u} \right\} \right),$$
 $$\text{sf}\left( \left\{ D_{t}^{u} \right\} \right):=\text{sf}\left( \left\{ F_{t}^{u} \right\} \right),$$
recovers the pairing of the   $K$ -homology class
 $K$ -homology class   $[D]$  with the
 $[D]$  with the   $K$ -theory class
 $K$ -theory class   $[u]$ .
 $[u]$ .
We use I.M. Singer's idea (as did E. Getzler in the   $\theta $ -summable case) to consider the operator
 $\theta $ -summable case) to consider the operator   $B$  as a parameter in the Banach manifold,
 $B$  as a parameter in the Banach manifold,   ${{B}_{\text{sa}}}\left( H \right)$ , so that spectral flow can be exhibited as the integral of a closed 1-form on this manifold. Now, for
 ${{B}_{\text{sa}}}\left( H \right)$ , so that spectral flow can be exhibited as the integral of a closed 1-form on this manifold. Now, for   $B$  in our manifold, any
 $B$  in our manifold, any   $X\,\in \,{{T}_{B}}({{B}_{\text{sa}}}(H))$  is given by an
 $X\,\in \,{{T}_{B}}({{B}_{\text{sa}}}(H))$  is given by an   $X$  in
 $X$  in   ${{B}_{\text{sa}}}(H)$  as the derivative at
 ${{B}_{\text{sa}}}(H)$  as the derivative at   $B$  along the curve
 $B$  along the curve   $t\,\mapsto \,B\,+\,tX$  in the manifold. Then we show that for
 $t\,\mapsto \,B\,+\,tX$  in the manifold. Then we show that for   $m$  a sufficiently large half-integer:
 $m$  a sufficiently large half-integer:
  $$\alpha (X)=\frac{1}{{{{\tilde{C}}}_{m}}}\text{Tr}\left( X{{\left( 1+{{\left( D+B \right)}^{2}} \right)}^{-m}} \right)$$
 $$\alpha (X)=\frac{1}{{{{\tilde{C}}}_{m}}}\text{Tr}\left( X{{\left( 1+{{\left( D+B \right)}^{2}} \right)}^{-m}} \right)$$
is a closed 1-form. For any piecewise smooth path   $\left\{ {{D}_{t}}=D+{{B}_{t}} \right\}$  with
 $\left\{ {{D}_{t}}=D+{{B}_{t}} \right\}$  with   ${{D}_{0}}$  and
 ${{D}_{0}}$  and   ${{D}_{1}}$ unitarily equivalent we show that
 ${{D}_{1}}$ unitarily equivalent we show that
  $$\text{sf}\left( \left\{ {{D}_{t}} \right\} \right)=\frac{1}{{{{\tilde{C}}}_{m}}}\int_{\text{0}}^{\text{1}}{\text{T}}\text{r}\left( \frac{d}{dt}\left( {{D}_{t}} \right){{\left( 1+D_{1}^{2} \right)}^{-m}} \right)dt$$
 $$\text{sf}\left( \left\{ {{D}_{t}} \right\} \right)=\frac{1}{{{{\tilde{C}}}_{m}}}\int_{\text{0}}^{\text{1}}{\text{T}}\text{r}\left( \frac{d}{dt}\left( {{D}_{t}} \right){{\left( 1+D_{1}^{2} \right)}^{-m}} \right)dt$$
the integral of the 1-form   $\alpha $ . If
 $\alpha $ . If   ${{D}_{0}}$  and
 ${{D}_{0}}$  and   ${{D}_{1}}$  are not unitarily equivalent, wemust add a pair of correction terms to the right-hand side. We also prove a bounded finitely summable version of the form:
 ${{D}_{1}}$  are not unitarily equivalent, wemust add a pair of correction terms to the right-hand side. We also prove a bounded finitely summable version of the form:
  $$\text{sf}\left( \left\{ {{F}_{t}} \right\} \right)=\frac{1}{{{C}_{n}}}\int_{\text{0}}^{\text{1}}{\text{T}}\text{r}\left( \frac{d}{dt}\left( {{F}_{t}} \right){{\left( 1-{{F}_{t}}^{2} \right)}^{n}} \right)dt$$
 $$\text{sf}\left( \left\{ {{F}_{t}} \right\} \right)=\frac{1}{{{C}_{n}}}\int_{\text{0}}^{\text{1}}{\text{T}}\text{r}\left( \frac{d}{dt}\left( {{F}_{t}} \right){{\left( 1-{{F}_{t}}^{2} \right)}^{n}} \right)dt$$
for   $n\ge \frac{p-1}{2}$  an integer. The unbounded case is proved by reducing to the bounded case via the map
 $n\ge \frac{p-1}{2}$  an integer. The unbounded case is proved by reducing to the bounded case via the map   $D\mapsto F=D{{(1+{{D}^{2}})}^{-\frac{1}{2}}}$  We prove simultaneously a type II version of our results.
 $D\mapsto F=D{{(1+{{D}^{2}})}^{-\frac{1}{2}}}$  We prove simultaneously a type II version of our results.