Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:40:25.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correlation between Cerebral Blood Flow, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials, CT Scan Grade and Neurological Grade in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

M. Fazl ,
D.A. Houlden  and
K. Weaver
M. Fazl*
Affiliation:
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto
D.A. Houlden
Affiliation:
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto
K. Weaver
Affiliation:
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto
*
Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Ste. A-138, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Cerebral blood flow (CBF) and central conduction time (CCT) were recorded from 58 subarachnoid hemorrhage patients and from 49 age-matched controls. CBF was calculated following Xenon inhalation and CCT was determined from somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP's) following median nerve stimulation. Each patient had a CT scan on the day of admission which was graded from I-IV. CBF, CCT and neurological grade (Hunt and Hess classification) were concomitantly recorded 1, 4, 7 and 14 days after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Mean CBF was highest in patients with neurological grades I and II (48.6 ± 12.3 and 48.1 ± 10.3 ml/lOOgm/min respectively) and lowest in patients with neurological grade IV (37.3 ± 9.6 ml/lOOgm/min). Patients in neurological grade I or II had mean CBF and CCT measurements that were significantly different from those obtained from patients in neurological grade IV (P < 0.05). Neurological grade and CT scan grade correlated with CBF (P < 0.0001) better than CCT (P = 0.015). Unexpectedly low CBF's from patients in neurological grades II and III (< 37 and < 31 ml/lOOgm/min respectively) failed to significantly prolong CCT suggesting CCT is unable to detect marginal ischemia. A significant correlation between CBF and CCT occurred only when CBF was < 30 ml/lOOgm/min (R = 0.75, P = 0.05). It appears that prolonged CCT is associated with a drop in CBF only when CBF drops below a certain threshold.

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , November 1991 , pp. 453 - 457
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1991

References

REFERENCES

1.Fisher, CM, Robertson, GH, Ojemann, RG.Cerebral vasospasm with ruptured saccular aneurysm — The clinical manifestations. Neurosurgery 1977; 1: 245–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Fisher, CM, Kistler, JP, Davis, JM.Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computer tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery 1980; 6: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Ishii, R.Regional cerebral blood flow in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysm. J Neurosurg 1979; 50: 587–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Symon, L, Hargadine, J, Zawirski, M, et al. Central conduction time as an index of ischemia in subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurol Sci 1979; 44: 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Yamakami, I, Isobe, K, Yamaura, A, et al. Vasospasm and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysm: Serial rCBF studies with the xenon-133 inhalation method. Neurosurgery 1983; 13: 394–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Drake, CG.Post-operative arterial spasm. In: Wilkins, RH,ed. Cerebral Arterial Spasm: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1980; 180: 435–437.Google Scholar
7.Ferguson, GG, Farrar, JK, Meguro, K, et al. Serial measurements of CBF as a guide to surgery in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1981; 1 (suppl.1): S518-S.Google Scholar
8.Hargadine, JR, Branston, NM, Symon, L.Central conduction time in primate brain ischemia — a study in baboons. Stroke 1980; 11: 637–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Rosenstein, J, Wang, ADJ, Symon, L, et al. Relationship between hemispheric cerebral blood flow, central conduction time, and clinical grade in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 1985; 62: 25–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Hunt, WE, Hess, RM.Surgical risk related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysm. J Neurosurg 1968; 28: 14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Hume, AL, Cant, BR.Conduction time in central somatosensory pathways in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978; 45: 361–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Hume, AL, Cant, BR, Shaw, NA.Central somatosensory conduction time in comatose patients. Ann Neurol 1979; 5: 379–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Obrist, WD, Thompson, HK Jr, Want, HS, et al. Regional cerebral blood flow estimated by xenon-133 inhalation. Stroke 1975; 6: 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Risberg, J, Ali, Z, Wilson, EM, et al. Regional cerebral blood flow by 133 xenon inhalation. Stroke 1975; 6: 142–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Branston, NM, Symon, L, Crockard, HA, et al. Relationship between the cortical evoked potential and local cortical blood flow following acute middle cerebral artery occlusion in the baboon. Exp Neurol 1974; 45: 195–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Heiss, WD, Hayakawa, T, Waltz, AG.Cortical neuronal function during ischemia. Effects of occlusion of one middle cerebral artery on single-unit activity in cats. Arch Neurol 1976; 33: 813–820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Astrup, J, Symon, L, Branston, NM, et al. Cortical evoked potential and extracellular K+ and H+ at critical levels of brain ischemia. Stroke 1977; 8: 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Dowman, R, Boisvert, DP, Gelb, AW, et al. Changes in the somatosensory evoked potential during and immediately following temporary middle cerebral artery occlusion predict somatosensory cortex ischemic lesions in monkeys. J Clin Neurophysiol 1990; 7: 269–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Mauguiere, F, Desmedt, JE, Courjon, J.Neural generators of N18 and P14 far-field somatosensory evoked potentials studied on patients with lesion of thalamus or thalamo-cortical radiations. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983; 56: 283–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Urasaki, E, Wada, S, Kadoya, C, et al. Origin of scalp far-field N18 of SSEP’s in response to median nerve stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990; 77: 39–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Desmedt, JE, Cheron, G.Non-cephalic reference recording of early somatosensory potentials to finger stimulation in adult or aging normal man: differentiation of widespread N18 and contralateral N20 from the prerolandic P22 and N30 components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1981; 52: 553–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Zegers de Beyl, D, Delberghe, X, Herbaut, AG, et al. The somatosensory central conduction time: Physiological considerations and normative data. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988; 781: 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar