Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T06:51:17.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diagnostic Strategies in Young Patients with Ischemic Stroke in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2016

Michael T.Y. Chan ,
Zurab G. Nadareishvili ,
John W. Norris  and
Canadian Stroke Consortium
Michael T.Y. Chan
Affiliation:
Stroke Research Unit, Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
Zurab G. Nadareishvili*
Affiliation:
Stroke Research Unit, Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
John W. Norris
Affiliation:
Stroke Research Unit, Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
*
Stroke Branch, NIH, NINDS, 36 Convent Drive, Bldg. 36, 4A03 Bethesda, Maryland, 20892-4128 U.S.A..
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

A preliminary national survey of ischemic stroke in the young (15-45 years) undertaken by the Canadian Stroke Consortium indicated that in 44% of 356 patients, no cause was found.

Objective:

To determine the reason for this high incidence of diagnostic uncertainty in young patients with ischemic stroke.

Methods:

Neurologists in the ten Canadian stroke centers completed a detailed questionnaire for patients aged 15-45 years admitted to hospital between January 1993 and December 1997. Using a step-wise diagnostic algorithm incorporating clinical, neuroimaging, neurovascular and laboratory data, we divided patients into three groups: (1) those with established cause for the ischemic stroke, (2) those who remained unexplained despite adequate investigation, (3) those who remained unexplained but were, in our opinion, under-investigated.

Results:

In 197 patients (56%), an identified cause was established including cardioembolic sources (14%), extracranial arterial dissection (13%), lacunar infarcts (8%) atherosclerosis (6%). A miscellaneous group of 15%, included cerebral venous thrombosis, coagulopathies, vasculitis and others. In 159 patients (44%) with no apparent cause for their stroke, we considered only 81 (23%) adequately investigated, and 78 (21%) inadequately investigated.

Conclusion:

About one in five young patients was inadequately investigated by a stroke-oriented group of neurologists. The major problem appears to be restriction of investigations to neuroimaging alone (usually computerized cerebral tomography), without further tests such as cerebral angiography and cardiac imaging.

Type
Original Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , May 2000 , pp. 120 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2000

References

REFERENCES

1. Mayo, NE, Neville, D, Kirkland, S, et al. Hospitalization and case fatality rates for stroke in Canada from 1982 through 1991. The Canadian Collaborative Study Group of Stroke Hospitalizations. Stroke 1996;27:1215–1220.Google Scholar
2. Bogousslavsky, J, Pierre, P. Ischemic stroke in patients under age 45. Neurol Clin 1992;10:113–124.Google Scholar
3. Adams, HP Jr, Kappelle, LJ, Biller, J, et al. Ischemic stroke in young adults. Experience in 329 patients enrolled in the Iowa Registry of Stroke in Young adults. Arch Neurol 1995;52:491–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Rohr, J, Kittner, S, Feeser, B, et al. Traditional risk factors and ischemic stroke in young adults: the Baltimore-Washington Cooperative Young Stroke Study. Arch Neurol 1996;53:603–607.Google Scholar
5 Kittner, SJ, Stern, BJ, Wozniak, M, et al.Cerebral infarction in young adults. The Baltimore-Washington Cooperative Young Stroke Study. Neurology. 1998; 50:890–894.Google Scholar
6. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias, and facial pain. Cephalalgia 1988;8:27.Google Scholar
7. Bartels, E, Flugel, KA. Evaluation of extracranial vertebral artery dissection with duplex color- flow imaging. Stroke 1996;27:290–295.Google Scholar
8. Adams, HP Jr, Bendixen, BH, Kappelle, LJ, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. Stroke 1993;24:35–41.Google Scholar
9. Bogousslavsky, J, Regli, F. Ischemic stroke in adults younger than 30 years of age. Arch Neurol 1986; 43:793–796.Google Scholar
10. Sloan, MA, Kittner, SJ, Feeser, BR, et al. Illicit drug-associated ischemic stroke in the Baltimore-Washington Young Stroke Study. Neurology 1998;50:1688–1693.Google Scholar
11. Hornig, CR, Brainin, M, Mast, H. Cardioembolic stroke: results from three current stroke data banks. Neuroepidemiol 1994;318:318–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Ezekowitz, MD, Bridgers, SL, James, KE, et al. Warfarin in the prevention of stroke associated with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1406–1412.Google Scholar
13. Hata, JS, Ayres, RW, Biller, J, et al. Impact of transesophageal echocardiography on the anticoagulation management of patients admitted with focal cerebral ischemia. Am J Cardiol 1993;72:707–710.Google Scholar
14. Lethen, H, Flachskamp, FA, Schneider, R, et al. Frequency of deep vein thrombosis in patients with patent foramen ovale and ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80:1066–1069.Google Scholar
15. Perrier, A, Desmarais, S, Miron, MJ, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet 1999;353: 190–195.Google Scholar
16. Ferro, D, Quintarelli, C, Rasura, M, Antonini, G, Violi, F. Lupus anticoagulant and the fibrinolytic system in young patients with stroke. Stroke 1993;24:368–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Mohr, JP, Sacco, RL. Classification of ischemic strokes. In: Barnet, HJM, Mohr, JP, Stein, BM, Yatsu, FM, eds. Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management. 2nd ed. New York: NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1992:271–283.Google Scholar