Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:33:11.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Extracellular Matrix Proteins on the Growth and Differentiation of an Anaplastic Glioma Cell Line

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

James T. Rutka*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
*
c/o The Editorial Office, Department of Neurological Surgery, 1360 Ninth Avenue, Suite 210, San Francisco, CA 94122 USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Efforts to determine the factors responsible for reversing malignancy in the central nervous system may not only increase our understanding of the growth of primary human brain tumors, but may eventually prove to be of therapeutic benefit as well. We therefore devised a model system to study the effects of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins on the malignant phenotype of an anaplastic glioma line, U-343 MG-A. Well-characterized cultures derived from normal human leptomeninges were grown to confluence and maintained for 2 weeks. The pia-arachnoid cells were then removed with detergent and base, leaving behind an ECM enriched in laminin, fibronectin, types I and IV collagen, and procollagen III. U-343 MG-A tumor cells planted on top of this normal ECM were profoundly growth inhibited, developed multiple slender cytoplastic processes similar to those of normal astrocytes, and expressed more GFAP per cell than did tumor cells growing on plastic alone. The growth of U-343 MG-A tumor cells in flasks coated with purified fibronectin or laminin was not significantly inhibited. However, U-343 MG-A cultures grown in flasks coated with type I or IV collagen showed decreased cellular proliferation and altered cell morphology. Conditioned medium from U-343 MG-A tumor cells growing on plastic alone contained a 64 kD activated metalloprotease. U-343 MG-A tumor cells growing on the pia-arachnoid ECM do not demonstrate such proteolytic activity. We conclude that the tumor cell microenvironment is extremely important in modulating the growth and differentiation of an anaplastic glioma cell line. It is hoped that an increased knowledge of the production of ECM components and their effects on malignant glioma cell growth, migration and differentiation will lead to the development of new approaches to improve the prospects of patients with primary malignant brain tumors.

Type
Special Features
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1986

References

1.Miller, EC, Miller, JA.Searches for ultimate chemical carcinogens and their reactions with cellular macromolecules. Cancer 1981; 47: 23272345.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Hecker, E.Structure-activity relationships in diterpene esters irritant and cocarcinogenic to mouse skin. In: Slaga, TJ, Sivak, A, and Boutwell, RK, eds. Carcinogenesis. A comprehensive survey. Mechanisms of Tumor Promotion and Cocarcinogenesis, New York: Raven Press, 1978: 1148.Google Scholar
3.Breitman, TR, Selonick, SE, Collins, SJ.Induction of differentiation of the human promyelocytic leukemia cell line (HL-60) by retinoic acid. PNAS 1980; 77: 29362940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Davies, PJA, Moore, WT Jr, Murtaugh, MP.Retinoid-regulatedgene expression in normal and leukemic myeloid cells. Bio-Essays 1985; 1: 160165.Google Scholar
5.Dion, LD, Blalock, JE, Gifford, GE.Retinoic acid and the restoration of anchorage dependent growth to transformed mammalian cells. Exp Cell Res 1978; 117: 1522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Sporn, MB, Roberts, AB.Role of retinoids in differentiation and carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1983; 43: 30343040.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Sidell, N.Retinoic acid-induced growth inhibition and morphologic differentiation of human neuroblastoma cells in vitro. JNCI 1982; 68: 589593.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Hay, ED.Extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol 1981; 91: 205s–223s.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Reid, LM, Fefferson, DM.Cell culture studies using extracts of ECM to study growth and differentiation in mammalian cells. In: Mather, JP, ed. Mammalian Cell Culture. New York: Plenum, 1984; 239280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Laurie, GW, LeBlond, CP, Martin, GR.Localization of type IV collagen, laminin, heparin sulfate proteoglycan, and fibronectin to the basal lamina of basement membranes. J Cell Biol 1982; 95: 340344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Timpl, R, Rhode, H, Robey, PG, et al. Laminin — a glycoprotein from basement membranes. J Biol Chem 1979; 254: 99339937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Kleinman, KH, Klebe, RJ, Martin, GR.Role of collagenous matrices in the adhesion and growth of cells. J Cell Biol 1981; 88: 473485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Carpenter, MB.Human neuroanatomy, 6th ed., Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1971; 1225.Google Scholar
14.Schachner, M, Schoonmaker, G, Hynes, RO.Cellular and subcellular localization of LETS protein in the nervous system. Brain Res 1978; 158: 149155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Shellswell, GB, Restali, DJ, Duance, VC, et al. Identification and differential distribution of collagen types in the central and peripheral nervous systems. FEBS Lett 1979; 106: 305309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Mauro, A, Bertolotto, A, Germano, I, et al. Collagenase in the immunohistochemical demonstration of laminin, fibronectin and factor VllI/RAg in nervous tissue after fixation. Histochem J 1984; 80: 157163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Rutka, JT, Giblin, J, Dougherty, DV, et al. An ultrastructural and immunocytochemical analysis of leptomeningeal and meningioma cultures. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1986; 45: 285303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Carlsson, J, Nilsson, K, Westermark, B.Formation and growth of multicellular spheroids of human origin. Int J Cancer 1983; 31: 523533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Pahlman, S, Ruusala, Al, Abrahamsson, J.Retinoic acid-induced differentiation of cultured human neuroblastoma cells: a comparison with phorbol ester-induced differentiation. Cell 1984; 14: 135144.Google Scholar
20.Lotan, R.Effects of vitamin A and its analogs (retinoids) on normal and neoplastic cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1980; 605: 3391.Google ScholarPubMed
21.Lotan, R, Lotan, D.Stimulation of melanogenesis in a human melanoma cell line by retinoids. Cancer Res 1980; 40: 33453350.Google Scholar
22.Strickland, S, Smith, KK, Marotti, KR.Hormonal induction of differentiation in teratocarcinoma stem cells: generation of parietal endoderm by retinoic acid and dibutyryl cAMP. Cell 1980; 21: 347355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Breitman, TR, Collins, SJ, Keene, BR.Terminal differentiation of human promyelocytic leukemic cells in primary culture in response to retinoic acid. Blood 1981; 57: 10001004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Kretzschmar, HA, DeArmond, SJ, Forno, LS.Measurement of G FAP in hepatic encephalopathy by ELISA and transblots. J Neuropath Exp Neurol 1985; 44: 459471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Terranova, VP, Rao, CN, Kalebic, T.Laminin receptor on human breast carcinoma cells. PNAS 1983; 80: 444450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Jones, PA, DeClerk, YA.Destruction of extracellular matrixes containing glycoproteins, elastin and collagen by metastatic human tumor cells. Cancer Res 1980; 40: 32223227.Google ScholarPubMed
27.Kao, RT, Wong, M, Stern, R.Elastin degradation by proteases from cultured human breast cancer cells. BBRC 1982; 105: 383389.Google ScholarPubMed
28.Kramer, RH, Vogel, KG, Nicholson, GL.Solubilization and degradation of subendothelial matrix glycoproteins and proteoglycans by metastatic tumor cells. J Biol Chem 1982; 257: 26782686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Liotta, LA, Tryggvason, K, Grabisa, S.Metastatic potential correlates with enzymatic degradation of basement membrane collagen. Nature 1980; 284: 6768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.McDonald, JK.An overview of protease specificity and catalytic mechanisms: aspects related to nomenclature and classification. Histochem J 1985; 17: 773785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed