Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:38:28.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Endovascular Management of Superior Cerebellar Artery Aneurysms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Charles Haw ,
Robert Willinsky ,
Ronit Agid  and
Karel TerBrugge
Charles Haw
Affiliation:
Division of Neuroradiology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Robert Willinsky
Affiliation:
Division of Neuroradiology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Ronit Agid
Affiliation:
Division of Neuroradiology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Karel TerBrugge
Affiliation:
Division of Neuroradiology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Superior cerebellar artery aneurysms are rare. We present a clinical series of twelve of these aneurysms that were treated exclusively with endovascular coils.

Method:

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of cerebral aneurysms treated with coil embolization was performed. Clinical notes and radiological images were reviewed.

Results:

Twelve superior cerebellar artery aneurysms were treated in eleven patients between 1992 and 2001. Seven patients presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage, two with neurologic deficit, and two had asymptomatic aneurysms. Coiling resulted in complete aneurysm obliteration in six patients and incomplete obliteration in the other six. No subsequent hemorrhage occurred with follow-up between 6 and 119 months (mean follow-up 50 months). Procedural morbidity was one superior cerebellar artery infarct with good recovery. Management morbidity was one middle cerebral artery embolus during a follow-up angiogram that required thrombolysis with a good clinical result. Nine out of 11 patients on follow-up were performing at Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 5. One patient with GOS 3 presented with a poor grade subarachnoid hemorrhage and the other patient with GOS 4 presented with a parenchymal hemorrhage due to an arteriovenous malformation.

Conclusion:

Endovascular treatment of superior cerebellar artery aneurysms is an effective treatment strategy with low morbidity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , February 2004 , pp. 53 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2004

References

1.Pierot, L, Boulin, A, Castaings, L, Rey, A, Moret, J.Selective occlusionof basilar artery aneurysms using controlled detachable coils: report of 35 cases. Neurosurgery 1996; 38:948–954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Lempert, TE, Malek, AM, Halbach, VV, et al. Endovascular treatmentof ruptured posterior circulation cerebral aneurysms. Clinical and angiographic outcomes. Stroke 2000; 31:100–110.Google Scholar
3.Uda, K, Murayama, Y, Gobin, P, Duckwiler, GR, Vinuela, F.Endovascular treatment of basilar artery trunk aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: clinical experience with 41 aneurysms in 39 patients. J Neurosurgery 2001; 95:624–632.Google Scholar
4.Drake, C.Report of World Federation of Neurological SurgeonsCommittee on a universal subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale. J Neurosurgery 1988; 68:985–986.Google Scholar
5.Debrun, GM, Aletich, VA, Kehrli, P, et al. Selection of cerebralaneurysms for treatment using Guglielmi detachable coils: the preliminary University of Illinois at Chicago experience. Neurosurgery 1998; 43:1281–1297.Google Scholar
6.Vinuela, F, Duckwiler, GR, Mawad, M.Guglielmi detachable coilembolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. J Neurosurgery 1997; 86:475–482.Google Scholar
7.Regli, L, Dehdashti, AR, Uske, A, de Tribolet, N.Endovascular coilingcompared with surgical clipping for the treatment of unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: an update. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2002; 82:41–46.Google Scholar
8.Ng, P, Khangure, MS, Phatouros, CC, et al. Endovascular treatment ofintracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils. Analysis of midterm angiographic and clinical outcomes. Stroke 2002; 33:210–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Malisch, TW, Guglielmi, G, Vinuela, F, et al. Intracranial aneurysmstreated with the Guglielmi detachable coil: midterm clinical results in a consecutive series of 100 patients. J Neurosurgery 1997; 87:176–183.Google Scholar
10.International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) CollaborativeGroup. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 360:1267–1274.Google Scholar
11.Zhang, JY, Barrow, DL, Cawley, CM, Dion, JE. Neurosurgical management of intracranial aneurysms previously treated with endovascular therapy. Neurosurgery 2003; 52:283–295.Google Scholar