Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T23:38:45.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mechanism of Embolic Watershed Infarction: Experimental Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

M.S. Pollanen  and
J.H.N. Deck
M.S. Pollanen
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Division of Neuropathology, Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, EC-4-316, Toronto, Ontario
J.H.N. Deck*
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Division of Neuropathology, Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, EC-4-316, Toronto, Ontario
*
Department of Pathology, Division of Neuropathology, EC-4-316, Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The mechanism for the preferential distribution of emboli to cerebral arterial bordcrzone regions, known to cause some watershed infarcts was studied. We hypothesized that emboli of a specific size range are selectively directed to the arterial borderzones due to the tendency of emboli to bypass the small arterial branches which emerge proximal to major borderzones. To test this hypothesis we perfused the brains of cadavers with suspensions of 90-210 µm glass microspheres and chemically extracted the particles from various arterial territories and a watershed zone. Particles in the 150-210 µm size range were found to be preferentially distributed to the watershed zone whereas particles less than 150 µm in size were randomly dispersed in leptomeningeal arteries of all vascular regions. To assess the role of branch size on the concentration of emboli at bifurcations, we perfused artificial analogs of evenly and unevenly branching bifurcations with suspensions of 90-150 µm and 150-210 µm particles. Branching cylinders with symmetrical branches contained the same concentration of particles, independent of particle size. In contrast, when one branch was one-quarter the size of the other, the concentration of 150-210 µm particles in the asymmetric branch was approximately 65% of the main trunk. Particles 90-150 µm in size were evenly distributed despite variation in branch size. These results indicate that emboli, of a limited range of size, may be selectively propagated to the distal ramifications of subarachnoid arteries located in the watershed zone rather than diverging into small calibre branches which arise along the way.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , November 1990 , pp. 395 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1990

References

REFERENCES

1.Brierley, JB, Excell, BJ. The effect of profound hypotension upon the brain of M. Rhesus. Physiological and pathological observations. Brain 1966; 89: 269–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Brierley, JB, Prior, PF, Calverley, J, et al. The pathogenesis of neuronal damage along the cerebral arterial boundary zones in Papio Anubis. Brain 1980; 103: 929–965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Adams, JH, Brierley, BJ, Connor, RCR, et al. The effects of systemic hypotension upon the human brain. Clinical and neuropathologic observations in 11 cases. Brain 1966; 89: 235–268.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Torvik, A. The pathogenesis of watershed infarcts in the brain. Stroke 1984; 15: 221–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Torvik, A, Skullerud, K. Watershed infarcts in the brain caused by microemboli. Clin Neuropathol 1982; 1: 99–105.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Pollanen, MS, Deck, JHN. Directed embolization is an alternate cause of cerebral watershed infarction. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1989; 113: 1139–1141.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Beal, MF, Williams, RS, Richardson, EP, et al. Cholesterol embolism as cause of transient ischemic attacks and cerebral infarction. Neurology 1981; 31: 860–865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.McKinnon, DW, Bulkley, BH, Green, WR, et al. Fatal cerebral atheromatous embolization after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovas Surg 1976; 71: 741–745.Google Scholar
9.Price, DL, Harris, J. Cholesterol emboli in cerebral arteries as a complication of retrograde aortic perfusion during cardiac surgery. Neurology 1970; 20: 1209–1214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Charm, SE, Kurland, GS. Flow behaviour of blood. In: Blood Flow and Microcirculation. New York: John Wiley and Son 1974; 87–97.Google Scholar
11.Bugliarello, G, Hsiao, GCC. Phase separation in suspensions flowing through bifurcations: a simplified hemodynamic model. Science 1964; 143: 469–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Steegman, AT, DeLaFuente, J. Experimental cerebral embolism II. Microembolism of rabbit brain with seran polymer resin. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1959; 18: 537–558.Google Scholar
13.Pedley, TJ. Flow in asymmetric bifurcations. In: The Fluid Mechanics of Large Blood Vessels. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press 1980; 260–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Charm, SE, Kurland, GS, Brown, SL. The flow characteristics of blood suspensions. In: Biomedical Fluid Mechanics Symposium. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers 1966; 89–93.Google Scholar
15.Segre, G, Silberger, A. Behaviour of macroscopic rigid spheres in Pouiseuelle flow. Part I. Determination of local concentration by statistical analysis of particle passage through crossed light beams. J Fluid Mech 1962; 14: 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar