Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T10:58:55.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Pattern Electroretinogram in Optic Nerve Demyelination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Trevor H. Kirkham  and
Stuart G. Coupland
Trevor H. Kirkham*
Affiliation:
Departments of Neurology. Neurosurgery and Ophthalmology. McGill University, and the Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology at the Montreal Neurological Hospital
Stuart G. Coupland
Affiliation:
Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary and the Department of Sensory Physiology at the Alberta Children’s Hospital
*
Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology, Montreal Neurological Hospital, 3801 University Street, #201, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The pattern electroretinogram (PERG) is probably generated by the ganglion cell layer of the retina whose axons constitute the conductive fibres of the optic nerves. A study was undertaken of the PERG in a group of patients with clinically definite multiple sclerosis who had suffered optic nerve demyelination to assess the value of recording the PERG as a method for electrophysiological determination of optic nerve dysfunction. Pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP) were simultaneously recorded, each eye being stimulated separately, and four different check sizes were used. Although individual patients showed PERG abnormalities the results as a group showed no significant difference from the normal population so far as latency or amplitude of the PERG was concerned. Thus we conclude that the PERG, while an interesting measurement, does not satisfactorily reflect optic nerve dysfunction. Further, our results indicate that it is not such a useful measure as the pattern visual evoked response for detecting optic nerve disease.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , November 1983 , pp. 256 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1983

References

Arden, G. B., Vaegan, and Hogg, C.R. (1982). Clinical and experimental evidence that the pattern electroretinogram (PERG) is generated in more proximal retinal layers than the focal electroretinogram (FERG). Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 388: 580–601.Google Scholar
Bobak, P., Bodis-Wollner, I. and Harnois, C. (1983). Simultaneously recorded pattern-reversal electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in the evaluation of different types of optic nerve damage. Ann. Neurol. 14: 147.Google Scholar
Coupland, S.G. and Kirkham, T.H. (1981). Electroretinograhy and nystagmus: subtraction of eye movement artefact. Canad. J. Ophthalmol. 16: 192–194.Google ScholarPubMed
Dawson, W., Maida, T.M. and Rubin, M.L. (1982). Human pattern-evoked retinal responses are altered by optic atrophy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 22: 796–803.Google ScholarPubMed
Fiorentini, A., Maffei, L., Pirchio, M., Spinelli, D. and Porciatti, V. (1981). The ERG in response to alternating gratings in patients with diseases of the peripheral visual pathway. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 21: 490–493.Google Scholar
Kirkham, T.H. and Coupland, S.G. (1981a). Multiple regression analysis of diagnostic predictors in optic nerve disease. Canad. J. Neurol. Sci. 8: 67–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Kirkham, T.H. and Coupland, S.G. (1981b). Abnormal pattern electroretinograms with macular cherry-red spots: evidence for selective ganglion cell damage. Current Eye Res. 1: 367–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkham, T.H. and Coupland, S.G. (1983). Pattern ERG’s and check size: absence of spatial frequency tuning. Current Eye Res. 2: 511–521.Google Scholar
Maffei, L. (1982). Electroretinographic and visual cortical potentials in response to alternate gratings. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 388: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maffei, L. and Fiorentini, A. (1981). Electroretinographic responses to alternate gratings before and after section of the optic nerve. Science 211: 953–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, J.G., Ralston, J.V., Reed, J.L. and Van Dyk, H.J.L.(1982). Loss in pattern-elicited electroretinograms in optic nerve dysfunction. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 93: 418–422.Google ScholarPubMed
McDonald, W.I. and Halliday, A.M. (1977). Diagnosis and classification of multiple sclerosis. Brit. Med. Bull. 33: 4–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherman, J. (1982). Simultaneous pattern-reversal electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in disease of the macula and optic nerve. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 388: 214–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed