Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:16:24.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rotational Acceleration Measurements - Evaluating Helmet Protection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

M. Kis ,
F. Saunders ,
M.W. ten Hove  and
J.R. Leslie
M. Kis
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
F. Saunders
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Canada
M.W. ten Hove
Affiliation:
Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Canada
J.R. Leslie
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Purpose:

Current helmet testing standards do not address the rotational components of an impact to the head. We describe a new testing paradigm used to measure the rotational acceleration of a headform and a protective helmet following an impact to the head in the horizontal plane. This impact simulation allows for the testing of currently available head protection devices in conditions thought to be important for the generation of cerebral concussion. The degree to which a particular helmet dampens rotational acceleration, and thus protects against concussion, can be assessed.

Methods:

Our testing device consists of a pneumatic piston that provides a measured impact to a standard headform. Four different helmets were tested using the described paradigm.

Results:

Acceleration curves for each helmet and the corresponding headform are presented.

Conclusion:

Clear differences in rotational acceleration were demonstrated. Possible avenues of further investigation are discussed.

Type
Other
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , November 2004 , pp. 499 - 503
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2004

References

1. Bohnen, N, Jolles, J, Twijnstra, A. Neuropsychological deficits in patients with persistent symptoms six months after mild head injury. Neurosurgery 1992; 30(5): 692–695.Google Scholar
2. Barth, JT, Macciocchi, SN, Giordani, B, et al. Neuropsychological sequelae of minor head injury. Neurosurgery 1983; 13:529–533.Google Scholar
3. Cantu, RC. Head injuries in sport. Br J Sports Med 1996; 30: 196–.Google Scholar
4. McCrory, P. New treatments for concussion: the next millennium beckons. Clin J Sport Med 2001; 11: 193–.Google Scholar
5. Rimel, RW, Geordani, B, Barth, JT, et al. Disability caused by minor head injury. Neurosurgery 1981; 9: 228–.Google Scholar
6. Erlanger, DM, Kutner, KC, Barth, JT, et. al. Neuropsychology of sports related head injury: Dementia Pugilistica to post concussion syndrome. Clin Neuropsychol 1999; 13(2): 193–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Cantu, RC. Second-impact syndrome. Clin Sports Med 1998; 1: 44–.Google Scholar
8. Henderson, M. The effectiveness of bicycle helmets: a review. Paper presented at Motor Accidents Authority of New South Wales, Australia (Bicycle Helmet Safety Institute), ISBN 0 T310 6435 6. 1995.Google Scholar
9. Covassin, T, Swanik, CB, Sachs, ML. Epidemiological considerations of concussions among intercollegiate athletes. Appl Neuropsychol 2003; 10(1): 12–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Gennarelli, TA, Thibault, LE, Adams, JH, et al. Diffuse axonal injury and traumatic coma in the primate. Ann Neurol 1982; 12: 574–.Google Scholar
11. Ommaya, AK, Gennarelli, TA. Cerebral concussion and traumatic unconsciousness: correlation of experimental and clinical observations on blunt head injuries. Brain 1974; 97: 654–.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Holbourn, AHS. Mechanics of head injuries. Lancet 1943; 2: 438–441.Google Scholar
13. Halstead, PD. Performance testing updates in head, face and eye protection. J Athletic Training 2001; 36(3): 322–327.Google Scholar
14. Halstead, PD, Alexander, CF, Cook, EM, Drew, RC. Hockey headgear and the adequacy of current designs and standards. In: Ashare, AB, (Ed). Safety in Ice Hockey. American Society for Testing and Materials. Philadelphia: 1998:93–101.Google Scholar
15. McIntosh, A, McCrory, P, Comerford, J. The dynamics of concussive head impacts in rugby and Australian rules football. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32(12): 1980–1984.Google Scholar
16. Shaw, NA. The neurophysiology of concussion. Prog Neurobiol 2002; 67: 344–.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Nilson, B, Ponten, U. Experimental head injury in the rat. Part 2. Regional brain energy metabolism in concussive trauma. J Neurosurg 1977; 47:252–261.Google Scholar
18. Symonds, CP. Concussion and its sequelae. Lancet 1962; 1:1–5.Google Scholar
19. Hayes, RL, Lyeth, BG, Jenkins, LW. Neurochemical mechanisms of mild and moderate head injury: implications for treatment. In: Levin, HS, Eisenberg, HM, Benton, AL, (Eds). Mild Head Injury. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989; 54–79.Google Scholar
20. Gurdjian, ES. Recent advances in the study of the mechanism of impact injury of the head: a summary. Clin Neurosurg 1972; 19: 42–.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Pellman, EJ. Commentary: Background on the National Football League’s research on concussion in professional football. Neurosurgery 2003; 53:797–798.Google Scholar
22. Pellman, EJ, Viano, DC, Tucker, AM, Casson, IR, Waeckerle, JF. Concussion in professional football: reconstruction of game impacts and injuries. Neurosurgery 2003; 53:799–814.Google Scholar
23. Pellman, EJ, Viano, DC, Tucker, AM, Casson, IR. Concussion in professional football: location and direction of helmet impacts - Part 2. Neurosurgery 2003; 53:1328–1341.Google Scholar