Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T08:51:15.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Safety and Yield of Early Cessation of AEDs in Video-EEG Telemetry and Outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Farzad Moien-Afshari ,
Robert Griebel ,
Venkat Sadanand ,
Mirna Vrbancic ,
Lizbeth Hernandez-Ronquillo ,
Noel Lowry  and
José F. Téllez Zenteno
Farzad Moien-Afshari
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine-Division of Neurology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Robert Griebel
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Venkat Sadanand
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Mirna Vrbancic
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Lizbeth Hernandez-Ronquillo
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine-Division of Neurology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Noel Lowry
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
José F. Téllez Zenteno*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine-Division of Neurology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
*
Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8, Canada E-mail: jft084@mail.usask.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Video-electroencephalography (VEEG) telemetry is the simultaneous recording of ictal and interictal EEG pattern and paroxysmal behavior to investigate the nature of paroxysmal events.

Methods:

This is a prospective study performed to asses the safety and yield of early discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the telemetry unit. Over a 2.5-year period, 50 patients that met the indications for VEEG monitoring were admitted by an epileptologist to neuro-observation units with continuous monitoring, nursing coverage and EEG technicians support during working hours and on-call thereafter. In most cases AEDs (except Phenobarbital) were discontinued in 24h. We prospectively assessed the yield and safety of the telemetry investigation as well as epilepsy surgery outcomes.

Results:

Our monitoring answered the study question in 88% of the patients. The question was not answered in 12% of cases due to the lack of recorded events. Our results changed the management in 74% of cases and potentially improved quality of life by decreasing the AEDs consumption and number of seizures per month. Over all, 22% received epilepsy surgery and became either seizure free or their seizures became non-disabling. Our method significantly decreased the duration of hospital admission for monitoring and minimal complications occurred only in 8% of patients.

Conclusions:

In conclusion, our method for short VEEG monitoring has a high yield for diagnosis, minimal complications and is cost effective. These qualities, together with good surgery results validate our method for the investigation and treatment of refractory seizure cases.

Type
Original Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 5 , September 2009 , pp. 587 - 592
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2009

References

1.Benbadis, SR, O’Neill, E, Tatum, WO, Heriaud, L.Outcome of prolonged video-EEG monitoring at a typical referral epilepsy center. Epilepsia. 2004;45(9):1150–3.Google Scholar
2.Binnie, CD, Rowan, AJ, Overweg, J, Meinardi, H, Wisman, T, Kamp, A, et al.Telemetric EEG and video monitoring in epilepsy. Neurology. 1981;31(3):298–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Douglas, R, Nordli, JR.Usefulness of video-EEG monitoring. Epilepsia. 2006;47(S1):26–30.Google Scholar
4.Gotman, J, Marciani, MG.Electroencephalographic spiking activity, drug levels, and seizure occurrence in epileptic patients. Ann Neurol. 1985;17(6):597–603.Google Scholar
5.Gotman, J, Levtova, V, Farine, B.Graphic representation of the EEG during epileptic seizures. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;87(4):206–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Sutula, TP, Sackellares, JC, Miller, JQ, Dreifuss, FE.Intensive monitoring in refractory epilepsy. Neurology. 1981;31(3):243–7.Google Scholar
7.Cascino, GD.Video-EEG monitoring in adults. Epilepsia. 2002;43(S3):80–93.Google Scholar
8.Zhou, D, Wang, Y, Hopp, P, Kerling, F, Kirchner, A, Pauli, E, et al.Influence on ictal seizure semiology of rapid withdrawal of carbamazepine and valproate in monotherapy. Epilepsia. 2002;43(4):386–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Azar, NJ, Wang, L, Song, Y, Abou-Khalil, BW.Temporal pattern of oxcarbazepine and phenytoin withdrawal seizures during epilepsy monitoring. Epilepsy Res. 2008;79(1):78–83.Google Scholar
10.Yen, DJ, Chen, C, Shih, YH, Guo, YC, Liu, LT, Yu, HY, et al.Antiepileptic drug withdrawal in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy undergoing presurgical video-EEG monitoring. Epilepsia. 2001;42(2):251–5.Google Scholar
11.Gumnit, RJ, Walczak, TS.Guidelines for essential services, personnel, and facilities in specialized epilepsy centers in the United States. Epilepsia. 2001;42(6):804–14.Google Scholar
12.Buelow, JM, Privitera, M, Levisohn, P, Barkley, GL.A description of current practice in epilepsy monitoring units. Epilepsy Behav. 2009;15(3):308–13.Google Scholar
13.Wijesuriya, M, Jette, N, Macrodimitris, S, Suddes, M, Martini, J, Sadiq, S, et al.Quality and safety indicators for a seizure monitoring unit [abstract]. Epilepsia. 2007;48 Suppl 6:S28.Google Scholar
14.Noe, K, Drazkowski, J.Safety of long-term video EEG monitoring [Abstract]. Epilepsia. 2009;49 Suppl 7:S54.Google Scholar
15.Asano, E, Pawlak, C, Shah, A, Shah, J, Luat, AF, Ahn-Ewing, J, et al.The diagnostic value of initial video-EEG monitoring in children-review of 1000 cases. Epilepsy Res. 2005;66(1-3): 129–35.Google Scholar
16.McBride, AE, Shih, TT, Hirsch, LJ.Video-EEG monitoring in the elderly: a review of 94 patients. Epilepsia. 2002;43(2):165–9.Google Scholar
17.Malow, BA, Passaro, E, Milling, C, Minecan, DN, Levy, K.Sleep deprivation does not affect seizure frequency during inpatient video-EEG monitoring. Neurology. 2002;59(9):1371–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Benbadis, SR, Heriaud, L, Tatum, WO, Vale, FL.Epilepsy surgery, delays and referral patterns-are all your epilepsy patients controlled? Seizure. 2003;12(3):167–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Reuber, M, Fernandez, G, Bauer, J, Helmstaedter, C, Elger, CE.Diagnostic delay in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Neurology. 2002;58(3):493–5.Google Scholar
20.Benbadis, SR, Tatum, WO, Vale, FL.When drugs don’t work: an algorithmic approach to medically intractable epilepsy. Neurology. 2000;55(12):1780–4.Google Scholar
21.Carton, S, Thompson, PJ, Duncan, JS.Non-epileptic seizures: patients’ understanding and reaction to the diagnosis and impact on outcome. Seizure. 2003;12(5):287–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Gudmundsson, O, Prendergast, M, Foreman, D, Cowley, S.Outcome of pseudoseizures in children and adolescents: a 6-year symptom survival analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43(8):547–51.Google Scholar
23.Selwa, LM, Geyer, J, Nikakhtar, N, Brown, MB, Schuh, LA, Drury, I.Nonepileptic seizure outcome varies by type of spell and duration of illness. Epilepsia. 2000;41(10):1330–4.Google Scholar