Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-24T08:08:54.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A simple device to obtain reliable foot radiographs of ambulatory and non-ambulatory friedreich's ataxia patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

M. Billimoria ,
P. Allard ,
J. Sibille ,
J.P. Sirois ,
M. Duhaime  and
G. Geoffroy
M. Billimoria
Affiliation:
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University
P. Allard
Affiliation:
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University Paediatric Research Centre
J. Sibille
Affiliation:
Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal, Royal Ottawa Regional Rehabilitation Centre
J.P. Sirois
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Education, University of Montreal
M. Duhaime
Affiliation:
Paediatric Research Centre Service of Orthopaedic Surgery
G. Geoffroy
Affiliation:
Paediatric Research Centre Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal, Royal Ottawa Regional Rehabilitation Centre
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A simple radiographic apparatus standardizing foot position and simulating weight-bearing effects in the feet is described in this paper. It provides an effective means of obtaining reliable radiographic data for both ambulatory and nonambulatory patients. This device is presently used in an on-going study on pes cavus in Friedreich's ataxia.

Type
B—Clinical Physiology and Pathology
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 11 , Issue S4 , November 1984 , pp. 574 - 577
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1984

References

Gamble, FO, Yale, I (1975). Clinical Foot Roentgenology, 2nd ed New York: RE Kreiger.Google Scholar
Hammonds, CM (1970) Personal Interview. Clinical Foot Roentgenology 1975, 2nd ed, New York: RE Kreiger, pp 376–377.Google Scholar
Hlavac, HF (1967) Difference in X-Ray Findings with Varied Positioning of the Foot. JAPA, 57: 465–467.Google ScholarPubMed
Kreed, L(1979) Clark’s Positioning in Radiography, William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd, 81–87.Google Scholar
Ritchie, GW, Keim, HA (1968) Major Foot Deformities, their Classification and X-ray Analyses. J Can Assoc Radiol 19: 155–166.Google Scholar
Sibille, JP, Tremblay, C, Thiry, PS, Allard, P (1982) Reference Apparatus for Normalized Bi-Planar Radiographs of the Foot. Journal of Biomechanics, 15: p 34.Google Scholar
Templeton, AW, McAlister, WH, Zim, ID (1965) Standardization of Terminology and Evaluation of Osseous Relationships in Congenitally Abnormal Feet. Am J Roentgen. 93: 374–381.Google ScholarPubMed