Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:38:31.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Superficial Anastomotic Veins: Neurosurgical View Depending on 251 Cranitotomies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Taner Tanriverdi*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Hosam Al-Jehani
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Nicole Poulin
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Andre Olivier
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
*
Department of Neurosurgery, Montreal, Neurological Institute and Hospital, 3801 rue University, suite 109, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Superficial anastomotic veins (SAVs) have been studied extensively but little attention has been paid to clinical studies. The aim of this study is to provide variations in the drainage patterns of SAVs depending on the intraoperative findings.

Methods:

A total of 251 craniotomies due to intractable temporal lobe epilepsy were performed between 1972 and 1987 at the Montreal Neurological Institute. The courses of the three largest SAVs including the vein of Trolard (VT), vein of Labbe (VL) and superficial Sylvian vein (SSV) were studied.

Results:

All three veins showed variable courses. The most common predominant vein was the combination of the VL + SSV. The VT and VL were frequently coursed at the level of the central vein and middle temporal vein, respectively. On the right hemisphere the SSV was the predominant type while the VL tended to be predominant on the left hemisphere. A combination of VL and SSV was predominant in patients with right and/or left hemispheric dominance.

Conclusions:

The SAVs showed considerable variation in their courses and it is difficult to define an exact pattern although some courses showed constant directions. Attention should be paid not to damage these veins since in a considerable number of cases a single dominant vein may be responsible for draining a majority of the lateral surface of cerebral hemisphere.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2009

References

1.Koperna, T, Tschabitscher, M, Knosp, E.The termination of the vein of Labbe and its microsurgical significance. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1992;118:1725.Google Scholar
2.Meder, J-F, Chiras, J, Roland, J, Guinet, P, Bracard, S, Bargy, F.Venous territories of the brain. J Neuroradiol. 1994;21:11833.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Guppy, KH, Origitano, TC, Reichman, OH, Segal, S.Venous drainage of the infralateral temporal lobe in relationship to transtemporal/transtentorial approaches to the cranial base. Neurosurgery. 1997;41:61520.Google Scholar
4.Han, H, Tao, W, Zhang, M.The dural entrance of cerebral bridging veins into the superior sagittal sinus: an anatomical comparison between cadavers and digital substraction angiography. Neuroradiology. 2007;49:16975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Han, H, Yao, Z, Wang, H, Deng, X, Fong, AHY, Zhang, M.Dural entrance of the bridging vein into the transverse sinus provides a reliable measure for preoperative planning: an anatomic comparison between cadavers and neuroimages. Neurosurgery. 2008;62[ONS Suppl 2]:)ONS289ONS296.Google Scholar
6.Perese, DM.Superficial veins of the brain from a surgical point of view. J Neurosurg. 1960;17:40212.Google Scholar
7.Oka, K, Rhoton, AL, Barry, M, Rodriguez, R.Microsurgical anatomy of the superficial veins of the cerebrum. Neurosurgery. 1985;17:71148.Google Scholar
8.Ciszek, B, Dabrowska, M, Andrzejczak, A, Aleksandrowicz, R, Mazurowski, W, Zabek, M.Middle superficial cerebral vein. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 1998;57:14955.Google Scholar
9.Hochberg, FH, May, ML.Arteriographic correlates of handedness. Neurology. 1975;25:21822.Google Scholar
10.Ayanzen, RH, Bird, CR, Keller, PJ, McCully, FJ, Theobald, MR, Heiserman, JE.Cerebral MR venography: normal anatomy and potential diagnostic pitfalls. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21: 748.Google Scholar
11.Gvozdanovic, V.Changes in the superficial veins in cases of intracranial expanding processes. Acta Radiologica. 1956;46: 195202.Google Scholar
12.Matsubara, T.An observation on cerebral phlebograms with special reference to the changes in the superficial veins. Nagoya J Med Sci. 1960;23:86100.Google Scholar
13.Di Chiro, G.Angiographic patterns of cerebral convexity veins and superficial dural sinuses. Am J Roentgenol. 1962;87:30821.Google Scholar
14.Surendrababu, NRS, Livingstone, SRS.Variations in the cerebral venous anatomy and pitfalls in the diagnosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: low field MR experience. Indian J Med Sci. 2006;60:13542.Google Scholar
15.Ikushima, I, Korogi, Y, Kitajima, M, Yamura, M, Yamashita, Y.Evaluation of drainage patterns of the major anastomotic veins on the lateral surface of the cerebrum using three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MP-RAGE sequence. Eur J Radiol. 2006;58: 96101.Google Scholar
16.Aydin, IH, Tuzun, Y, Takci, E, Kadioglu, HH, Kayaoglu, CR, Barlas, E.The anatomical variations of sylvian veins and cisterns. Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1997;40:6873.Google Scholar
17.Wada, J, Rasmussen, T.Intracarotid injection of sodium amytal for lateralization of cerebral speech dominance. J Neurosurg. 1960;17:266282.Google Scholar
18.Olivier, A.Surgery of epilepsy: methods. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 1988;117:10313.Google Scholar
19.Delmas, A, Pertuiset, B, Bertrand, G.Les veines du lobe temporal. Rev Otoneuroophtalmol. 1951;23:22430.Google Scholar
20.Wolf, BS, Huang, YP, Newman, CM.The superficial sylvian venous drainage system. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1963;89:398410.Google ScholarPubMed