Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T22:55:33.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transcarpal Median Sensory Conduction: Detection of Latent Abnormalities in Mild Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Jacques De Léan
Jacques De Léan*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Neurophysiologie Clinique, Hôpital du St-Sacrement, 1050, Chemin Ste-Foy, Québec City, PQ, Canada G1S 4L8
*
Laboratoire de Neurophysiologie Clinique, Hôpital du St-Sacrement, 1050, Chemin Ste-Foy, Québec City, PQ, Canada G1S 4L8
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The major slowing of nerve conduction in the carpal tunnel syndrome is located in the palm to wrist segment. The aim of this study is to develop a reliable, sensitive and accessible approach to measure transcarpal median sensory nerve conduction. For this purpose, a fast recovery amplifier with a stimulus artifact suppressor was designed by the author. On stimulation of digits II or III, evoked orthodromic sensory nerve action potentials were simultaneously recorded at the palm and at the wrist. Distances were determined with a ruler. Median sensory nerve conduction velocity was estimated from digit to palm and from palm to wrist in 80 healthy hands and 253 hands with a presumptive diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. According to conventional criteria, 131 of the 253 hands from those suspected of carpal tunnel syndrome were thought to have median nerve compression. When transcarpal median sensory conduction velocity was taken into account, the diagnostic yield increased by 18.1%. The described technique provides a simple, sensitive and reliable method of diagnosing mild or early carpal tunnel syndrome.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , November 1988 , pp. 388 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1988

References

REFERENCES

1.Simpson, JA. Electrical signs in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and related syndromes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1956; 19: 275–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Buchtal, F, Rosenfalck, A. Sensory conduction from digit to palm and from palm to wrist in the carpal syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1971; 34: 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Buchtal, F, Rosenfalck, A. Trojaborg, W. Electrophysiological findings in entrapment of the median nerve at wrist and elbow. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1974; 37: 340–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Kimura, J. A method for determining median nerve conduction velocity across the carpal tunnel. J Neurol Sci 1978; 38: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Kimura, J. The carpal tunnel syndrome: localization of conduction abnormalities within the distal segment of the median nerve. Brain 1979; 102: 619–635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Brown, WF, Ferguson, GG, Jones, MW, et al. The location of conduction abnormalities in human entrapment neuropathies. Can J Neurol Sci 1976; 3: 111–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Thomas, JE, Lambert, EH, Cseuz, KA. Electrodiagnostic aspects of the carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Neurol 1967; 16: 635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Loong, SC. The carpal tunnel syndrome: a clinical and electrophysiological study of 250 patients. Proc Aust Assoc Neurol 1957; 14: 51.Google Scholar
9.Melvin, JL, Schuchmann, JA, Lanese, RR. Diagnostic specificity of motor and sensory nerve conduction variables in the carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1973; 54: 69.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Di Benedetto, M, Mitz, M, Klingbeil, GE, et al. New criteria for sensory nerve conduction especially useful in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 586–589.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Long, EW, Wolfgang, JW. Serial stimulation of the median nerve across the carpal canal (abstract). Muscle Nerve 1983; 6: 528.Google Scholar
12.Tachmann, W, Lehmann, HJ. Relative refractory period of median nerve sensory fibres in the carpal tunnel syndrome. Eur Neurol 1974; 12: 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Fullerton, PM. The effect of ischemia on nerve conduction studies in the carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1963; 26: 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Schwartz, MS, Gordon, JA, Swash, M. Slowed nerve conduction with wrist flexion in carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Neurol 1980; 8: 69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Singer, PA, Lin, JTY. Decrementai responses in carpal tunnel syndrome (abstract). Muscle Nerve 1982; 7: 566.Google Scholar
16.Casey, D, Lequesne, PM. Digital nerve action potentials in healthy subjects, and in carpal tunnel syndrome and diabetic subjects. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1972; 35: 612–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Eklund, G. A new electrodiagnostic procedure for measuring sensory nerve conduction across the carpal tunnel. Ups J Med Sci 1975; 80: 63–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Goodgold, J, Eberstein, A. Volume conduction and electromyography. Electrodiagnosis of neuromuscular diseases. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins 1983; 37–44.Google Scholar
19.Shahani, BT, Young, RR, Potts, F, et al. Terminal latency index (TL1) and late response studies in motor neuron disease (MND), peripheral neuropathies and entrapment syndromes (abstract). Acta Neurol Scand [Suppl] 1979; 73: 118.Google Scholar
20.Kraft, GH, Halvorson, GA. Median nerve residual latency: normal value and use in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 221–226.Google ScholarPubMed
21.Joynt, RL. Comparison of conduction study in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (abstract). Muscle Nerve 1982; 5: 566.Google Scholar
22.Joynt, RL. Comparison of residual latency and palmar stimulation for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (abstract). Muscle Nerve 1984; 7: 565.Google Scholar
23.Evans, BA, Daube, JR. A comparison of three electrodiagnostic methods of diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (abstract). Muscle Nerve 1984; 7: 565.Google Scholar
24.Dawson, MD, Hallet, M, Millender, LH. Entrapment neuropathies. Boston, Little, Brown and Company 1983.Google Scholar
25.Ma, DM, et al. In: Ma, DM, Liveson, JA, eds. Nerve Conduction Handbook. Philadelphia, F.A. Davis Company, 1983; 129–130.Google Scholar
26.Simpson, JA. Fact and fallacy in measurement of conduction velocity in motor nerves. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1964; 27: 381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Maynard, FM, Stolov, WC. Experimental error in determination of nerve conduction velocity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1972; 53: 362.Google ScholarPubMed
28.Swincow, TDW. Statistics at Square One. London, British Medical Journal 1976.Google Scholar
29.Arganbright, D. Statistics: mean, correlation and regression. Mathematical Applications of Electronic Spreadsheets. New York, McGaw Hill Book Company, 1985; 98–101.Google Scholar
30.Godfrey, K. Simple linear regression in medical research.? Engl J Med 1985; 313: 1629–1636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Hallet, M. Electrophysiologic approaches to the diagnosis of entrapment neuropathies. Neurologic Clinics 1985; 3: 531–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Daube, JR. Percutaneous palmar median nerve stimulation for carpal tunnel syndrome. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1977; 43: 139–140.Google Scholar
33.Mills, KR. Orthodromic sensory action potentials from palmar stimulation in the diagnosis of carpal syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1958; 48: 25–255.Google Scholar
34.Trilok, NM, Shanks, GL, Poole, BJ. Sensory palmar stimulation in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985; 66: 598–600.Google Scholar
35.Wongsam, PE, Johnson, EW,Weinerman, JD. Carpal tunnel syndrome: use of palmar stimulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 16–19.Google ScholarPubMed
36.Jablecki, C, Nazemi, R. Unsuspected digital nerve lesions responsible for abnormal median sensory responses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982; 63: 135–138.Google ScholarPubMed