Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T09:06:03.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anomalism and Supervenience: A Critical Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Oron Shagrir
Oron Shagrir*
Affiliation:
Departments of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, The Hebrew University, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, 91905, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The thesis that mental properties are dependent, or supervenient, on physical properties, but this dependence is not lawlike, has been influential in contemporary philosophy of mind. It is put forward explicitly in Donald Davidson's seminal ‘Mental Events.’ On the one hand, Davidson claims that the mental is anomalous, that ‘there are no strict deterministic laws on the basis of which mental events can be predicted and explained’ (1970, 208), and, in particular, that there are no strict psychophysical laws. On the other hand, he insists that the mental supervenes on the physical; that ‘mental characteristics are in some sense dependent, or supervenient, on physical characteristics’ (1970, 214).

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 237 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, K. 2004. ‘Global Supervenience and Dependence.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2004) 501–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1973. ‘Moral Realism.’ In Morality and Moral Reasoning, Casey, J. ed. London: Methuen. Reprinted in Blackburn 1993.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1985. ‘Supervenience Revisited.’ In Exercises in Analysis, Hacking, I. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Blackburn 1993.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1993. Essays in Quasi-Realism. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Block, N. 1990. ‘Can the Mind Change the Worldヨ’ In Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam, Boolos, G. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Block, N. 1997. ‘Anti-Reductionism Slaps Back.’ Mind, Causation, World, Philosophical Perspectives 11 (1997) 107–133.Google Scholar
Campbell, N. 2000. ‘Supervenience and Psycho-Physical Dependence.’ Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 39 (2000) 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, W. 1993. ‘Anomalism, Uncodifiability, and Psychophysical Relations.’ Philosophical Review 102 (1993) 215–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, W. 1994. Causality, Interpretation and the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1963. ‘Actions, Reasons and Causes.’ Journal of Philosophy 60 (1963) 685–700. Reprinted in Davidson 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1967. ‘Causal Relations.’ Journal of Philosophy 64 (1967) 691–703. Reprinted in Davidson 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1970. ‘Mental Events.’ In Experience and Theory, Foster, L. and Swanson, J.W. eds. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. Reprinted in Davidson 1980.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1973a. ‘The Material Mind.’ In Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress for Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Suppes, P. Henkin, L. Moisil, G.C and Joja, A. eds. Dordrecht: North-Holland. Reprinted in Davidson 1980.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1973b. ‘Radical Interpretation.’ Dialectica 27 (1973) 314–28. Reprinted in Davidson 1984b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1974. ‘Belief and the Basis of Meaning.’ Synthese 27 (1974) 309–23. Reprinted in Davidson 1984b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1975. ‘Thought and Talk.’ In Mind and Language, Guttenplan, S. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprinted in Davidson 1984b.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1980. Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1983. ‘A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge.’ In Kant oder Hegelヨ Henrich, D. ed. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. Reprinted in Davidson 2001.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1984a. ‘First-Person Authority.’ Dialectica 38 (1984) 101–12. Reprinted in Davidson 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1984b. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1985. ‘Reply to Harry Lewis.’ In Essays on Davidson: Actions and Events, Vermazen, B. and Hintikka, M. eds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1987. ‘Knowing One's Own Mind.’ Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 60 (1987) 441–58. Reprinted in Davidson 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1990a. ‘Turing's Test.’ In Modeling the Mind, Mohyeldin Said, K. Newton-Smith, W. Viale, R. and Wilkes, K. eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprinted in Davidson 2004.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1990b. ‘Representation and Interpretation.’ In Modeling the Mind, Said, K. Mohyeldin Newton-Smith, W. Viale, R. and Wilkes, K. eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprinted in Davidson 2004.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1991. ‘Three Varieties of Knowledge.’ In A.J.Ayer Memorial Essays: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 30, Griffiths, A. Phillips ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Davidson 2001.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1993. ‘Thinking Causes.’ In Mental Causation, Heil, J. and Mele, A. eds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1994. ‘Donald Davidson.’ In A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, Guttenplan, S. ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1995. ‘Could There Be a Science of Rationalityヨ’ International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (1995) 1–16. Reprinted in Davidson 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1997. ‘Indeterminism and Antirealism.’ In Realism/antirealism and Epistemology, Kulp, C.B. ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. Reprinted in Davidson 2001.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 2001. Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 2004. Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J.A. 1974. ‘Special Sciences, or the Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis.’ Synthese 28 (1974) 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1952. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1984. ‘Supervenience.’ Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 58 (1984) 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1972. ‘Phenomenal Properties, Psychophysical Laws, and the Identity Theory.’ Monist 56 (1972) 177–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1984. ‘Concepts of Supervenience.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (1984) 153–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1985. ‘Psychophysical Laws.’ In Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, LePore, E. and McLaughlin, B. eds. Oxford: Blackwell. Reprinted in Kim 1993a.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1989. ‘The Myth of Nonreductive Materialism.’ Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 63 (1989) 31–47. Reprinted in Kim 1993a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1990. ‘Supervenience as a Philosophical Concept.’ Metaphilosophy 1 (1990) 1–27. Reprinted in Kim 1993a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1992. ‘Multiple Realization and the Metaphysics of Reduction.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (1992) 1–26. Reprinted in Kim 1993a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1993a. Supervenience and Mind. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1993b. ‘Can Supervenience and ‘Nonstrict Laws’ Save Anomalous Monismヨ’ In Mental Causation, Heil, J. and Mele, A. eds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1998. ‘The Mind-Body Problem After Fifty Years.’ In Current Issues in Philosophy of Mind, O’Hear, A. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1999. ‘Making Sense of Emergence.’ Philosophical Studies 95 (1999) 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 2003. ‘Davidson's Philosophy of Mind/Psychology.’ In Contemporary Philosophy in Focus: Donald Davidson, Ludwig, K. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, H.A. 1985. ‘Is the Mental Supervenient on the Physicalヨ’ In Essays on Davidson: Actions and Events, Vermazen, B. and Hintika, M. eds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1979. ‘Virtue and Reason.’ Monist 62 (1979) 331–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. 1985. ‘Functionalism and Anomalous Monism.’ In Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, LePore, E. and McLaughlin, B. eds. Oxford & New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B.P. 1995. ‘Varieties of Supervenience.’ In Supervenience: New Essays, Savellos, E. and Yalcin, U.D. eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B.P. 1997: ‘Supervenience, Vagueness, and Determination.’ Philosophical Perspectives 11 (1997) 209–30.Google Scholar
Moore, G.E. 1922. Philosophical Studies. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
Nagel, E. 1961. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paull, C.R. and Sider, T.R. 1992. ‘In Defense of Global Supervenience.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (1992) 833–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereboom, D. 2002. ‘Robust Nonreductive Materialism.’ Journal of Philosophy 99 (2002) 499–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. 1967. ‘The Nature of Mental States’ (originally published as ‘Psychological Predicates’). In Art, Mind and Religion, Captain, W.H. and Merrill, D.D. eds. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1973. ‘Reductionism and the Nature of Psychology.’ Cognition 2 (1973) 131–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. 1975. ‘The Meaning of ‘Meaning.’’ In Language, Mind and Knowledge (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, VII), Gunderson, K. ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. 1970. ‘On the Reasons for Indeterminacy of Translation.’ Journal of Philosophy 67 (1970) 178–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. 1987. ‘Indeterminacy of Translation Again.’ Journal of Philosophy 84 (1987) 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shagrir, O. 1998. ‘Multiple Realization, Computation and the Taxonomy of Psychological States.’ Synthese 114 (1988) 445–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shagrir, O. 2002. ‘Global Supervenience, Coincident Entities and Anti-Individualism.’ Philosophical Studies 109 (2002) 171–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shagrir, O. Forthcoming. ‘Davidson's notion of Supervenience.’ Shapiro, L. 2000. ‘Multiple Realizations.’ Journal of Philosophy 97 (2000) 635–54.Google Scholar
Shagrir, O. 2005. The Mind Incarnate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shea, N. 2003. ‘Does Externalism Entail the Anomalism of the Mentalヨ’ Philosophical Quarterly 53 (2003) 201–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, T.R. 1999. ‘Global Supervenience and Identity across Times and Worlds.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1999) 913–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. 1999. ‘The Multiple Realizability Argument against Reductionism.’ Philosophy of Science 66 (1999) 542–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, R. 1996. ‘Varieties of Supervenience.’ Philosophical Perspectives 10 (1996) 221–41.Google Scholar
Yalowitz, S. 1997. ‘Rationality and the Argument for Anomalous Monism.’ Philosophical Studies 87 (1997) 235–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yalowitz, S. 1998: ‘Causation in the Argument for Anomalous Monism.’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28 (1998) 183–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar