Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T07:22:01.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conceptual Engineering, Topics, Metasemantics, and Lack of Control

Responses to Sarah Sawyer, Laura Schroeter, François Schroeter, and Tim Sundell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2020

Herman Cappelen
Herman Cappelen*
Affiliation:
University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
*
Email: herman.cappelen@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Author meets critics
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 50 , Issue 5 , July 2020 , pp. 594 - 605
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Canadian Journal of Philosophy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cappelen, Herman. 2008. “The Creative Interpreter: Content Relativism and Assertion.” Noûs 42 (1): 23–46.Google Scholar
Cappelen, Herman. 2018. Fixing Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, Herman. 2019. “Conceptual Engineering: The Master Argument.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by Burgess, Alexis, Cappelen, Herman, and Plunkett, David. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 2000. Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them to Be? Noûs 34 (1): 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul A. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Plunkett, David, and Sundell, Timothy. 2013. “Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms.” Philosophers’ Imprint 13 (23): 1–37.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Sarah. 2018. “The Importance of Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 118 (2): 127–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, Sarah. 2020. “The Role of Concepts in Fixing Language.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeter, Laura, and Schroeter, François. 2020. “Inscrutability and Its Discontents.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundell, Timothy. 2011a. “Disagreement, Error, and an Alternative to Reference Magnetism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90: 743–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundell, Timothy. 2017. “Aesthetic Negotiation.” In Semantics of Aesthetic Judgments, edited by Young, James. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sundell, Timothy. 2020. “Changing the Subject.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, Amie. 2019. “A Pragmatic Model for Conceptual Ethics.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by Burgess, Alexis, Cappelen, Herman, and Plunkett, David. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2007. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar