Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:21:27.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Storrs McCall
Storrs McCall*
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montreal, P.Q., CanadaH3A 2T7
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We all make decisions, sometimes dozens in the course of a day. This paper is about what is involved in this activity. It's my contention that the ability to deliberate, to weigh different courses of action, and then to decide on one of them, is a distinctively human activity, or at least an activity which sets man and the higher animals apart from other creatures. It is as much decisio as ratio that constitutes the distinguishing mark of human beings. Homo may not always be rationalis, but he is always decidens.

The paper is about practical decision, although there is also another important kind of decision that I won't discuss, namely cognitive decision. The difference is roughly that which distinguishes the function of a jury from that of a judge, at least in jury trials. The jury's job is to arrive at an answer to the question: guilty or not guilty? This is a cognitive decision, a decision that, on the basis of the evidence, such-and-such is the case. The judge, apprized of the jury's cognitive decision, makes the practical decision to sentence the guilty party to 20 years. On some other occasion, I hope to be able to say something about cognitive decision, as well as about a third kind of decision named value decision.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , June 1987 , pp. 261 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, J.L. Philosophical Papers (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1961)Google Scholar
Austin, J.L. How to do Things with Words (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1962)Google Scholar
Brand, Myles ‘Choosing and doing,’ Ratio 12 (1970), 85-92Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur C. ‘Basic actions,’ American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (1965), 141-8Google Scholar
Daveney, T.F. ‘Choosing,’ Mind 73 (1964), 515-26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, E.R. The Greeks and the Irrational (Berkeley: University of California Press 1951)Google Scholar
Dray, William ‘Choosing and doing,’ Dialogue 1 (1962), 129-52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Ward ‘The theory of decision making,’ Psych. Bull. 51 (1954), reprinted in Edwards, and Tversky, eds., Decision Making (Penguin 1967).Google Scholar
Evans, J.L. ‘Choice,’ Philosophical Quarterly 5 (1955), 303-15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, O.S. ‘Choice,’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 34 (1933), 269-94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, W.D. ‘On Choosing,’ Analysis 17 (1957), 135-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, W.D. ‘The Concept of Choosing,’ Analysis 20 (1960), 63-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Roger ‘Choosing as doing,’ Mind 77 (1968), 575-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, I.L. and Mann, L. Decision Making (New York: Free Press 1977)Google ScholarPubMed
Kenny, Anthony Aristotle's Theory of the Will (New Haven: Yale University Press 1979)Google Scholar
Kolnai, Aurel ‘Deliberation is of Ends,’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 62 (1962), 195-218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, James I. ‘Choosing flippantly or non-rational choice,’ Analysis 25 (1965), 132-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, Storrs ‘Freedom defined as the power to decide,’ American Philosophical Quarterly 21 (1984), 329-38Google Scholar
Nowell-Smith, P.H. Ethics (Penguin Books 1954; reprinted by Blackwells 1957; page numbers from the Penguin edition)Google Scholar
Nowell-Smith, P.H. ‘Choosing, Deciding and Doing,’ Analysis 18 (1958), 63-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, D.J. ‘Possibility and choice,’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol.(1960), 1-24Google Scholar
Ofstad, Harald An Inquiry into the Freedom of Decision (Oslo: Norwegian Universities Press 1961)Google Scholar
Oldenquist, Andrew ‘Choosing, Deciding, and Doing,’ The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edwards, Paul New York (1967) vol. 2, 96-104Google Scholar
Raiffa, Howard Decision Analysis (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley 1968).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph ‘Reasons for action, decisions and norms,’ Mind 84 (1975), 481-99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas ‘Choice without preference,’ Kant-Studien 51 (1959), 142-75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert The Concept of Mind (London: Hutchinson 1949)Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul L’Etre et le Neant (Paris: Gallimard 1943)Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul L’Existentialisme est un humanisme (Paris: Nagel 1946, reprinted 1967)Google Scholar
Shackle, G.L.S. Imagination and the Nature of Choice (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 1979)Google Scholar
Smith, Constance I. ‘A note on choice and on virtue,’ Analysis 17 (1956), 21-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, Bruno ‘Das Bewusstsein von eigenen Entscheidungen in friihen Griechentum,’ Philologus 85 (1930), 141-58Google Scholar
Bruno, Snell The Discovery of the Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1953)Google Scholar
Charles, Taylor ‘Responsibility for self,’ in Rorty, Amelie ed., The Identities of Persons (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 1976), 281-99, reprinted in Watson, Gary ed., Free Will, (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1982)Google Scholar
Taylor, Richard ‘Deliberation and Foreknowledge,’ American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (1964), 73-80Google Scholar