Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:46:39.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Denis Dutton, The Art Instinct. New York: Oxford University Press 2009. Pp. 278.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Mohan Matthen
Mohan Matthen*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto at Mississauga, Mississauga, ONL5L 1C6, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Critical Notice
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 337 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Briscoe, E.J. (2008) ‘Language Learning, Power Laws, and Sexual Selection.’ Mind & Society 7: 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casati, Roberto (2009) ‘Book Review: The Art Instinct by Denis Dutton,’ <http://tinyurl.com/2dlp4ts>..>Google Scholar
Dehaene, Stanislas (2009) Reading in the Brain: The Science and Evolution of a Human Invention New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Dutton, Denis (2000) ‘Art and Sexual Selection.’ Philosophy and Literature 24: 512–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, Denis (2006) ‘A Naturalist Definition of Art,’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64: 367–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, Howard (2008) The Man Who Forgot How to Read: A Memoir. Toronto: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Fisher, R.A. (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay (1977) Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay (1997) ‘Evolution: The Pleasures of Pluralism,’ The New York Review of Books, June 26, 47-52. (See <http://tinyurl.com/2elaged>.).)>Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay and Lewontin, Richard C. (1979) ‘The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme,’ Proceedings Of The Royal Society of London, Series B, 205, No. 1161: 581–98.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. and Zuk, Marlene (1982) ‘Heritable True Fitness and Bright Birds: A Role for Parasites?’ Science 218, no 4570. (Oct 22): 384–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Jerrold (2005) ‘Erotic Art and Pornographic Pictures,’ Philosophy and Literature 29: 228–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mag Uidhir, Christy (2009) ‘Why Pornography Can't be Art,’ Philosophy and Literature 33: 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Geoffrey (2000a) The Mating Mind. New York: Random House, Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Miller, G. F. (2000b) ‘Sexual Selection for Indicators of Intelligence,’ in Bock, G. Goode, J. & Webb, K. eds., The Nature of Intelligence. Novartis Foundation Symposium 233. New York: John Wiley, 260–75.Google Scholar
A.P., Møller and Mousseau, T.A. (2003) ‘Mutation And Sexual Selection: A Test Using Barn Swallows From Chernobyl.’ Evolution 57: 2139–46.Google Scholar
Rowe, Locke and Houle, David (1996) The Lek Paradox and the Capture of Genetic Variance by Condition-Dependent Traits. Proceedings Of The Royal Society of London, Series B, 263: 1415–21.Google Scholar
Zahavi, Amotz (1975) ‘Mate Selection — A Selection for a Handicap,’ Journal of Theoretical Biology 53: 205–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar