Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:10:11.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Desire satisfaction, death, and time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Duncan Purves
Duncan Purves*
Affiliation:
Philosophy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA Environmental Studies and Bioethics, New York University, New York, NY, USA
*
Email: duncan.purves@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Desire satisfaction theories of well-being and deprivationism about the badness of death face similar problems: desire satisfaction theories have trouble locating the time when the satisfaction of a future or past-directed desire benefits a person; deprivationism has trouble locating a time when death is bad for a person. I argue that desire satisfaction theorists and deprivation theorists can address their respective timing problems by accepting fusionism, the view that some events benefit or harm individuals only at fusions of moments in time. Fusionism improves on existing solutions to the timing problem for deprivationism because it locates death’s badness at the same time as both the victim of death and death itself, and it accounts for all of the ways that death is bad for a person. Fusionism improves on existing solutions to the problem of temporally locating the benefit of future and past-directed desires because it respects several attractive principles, including the view that the intrinsic value of a time for someone is determined solely by states of affairs that obtain at that time and the view that intrinsically beneficial events benefit a person when they occur.

Keywords

Deathtimethe timing problemwell-beingdesire satisfaction theory
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 47 , Issue 6 , 2017 , pp. 799 - 819
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bigelow, John, Campbell, John, and Pargetter, Robert. 1990. “Death and Well-being.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 71: 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Ben. 2004. “When is Death Bad for the One Who Dies?” Noûs 38 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Ben. 2009. Well-Being and Death. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557967.001.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, John. 2004. Weighing Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/019924376X.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckner, Donald. 2013. “Present Desire Satisfaction and Past Well-Being.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91: 15–29. 10.1080/00048402.2011.632016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Erik, and Johansson, Jens. Forthcoming. “Well-being without Being?: A Reply to Feit.” Utilitas.Google Scholar
Dorsey, Dale. 2013. “Desire-satisfaction and Welfare as Temporal.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16: 151–171. 10.1007/s10677-011-9315-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, Kai. 2004. “Epicurean Equanimity Towards Death.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (1): 92–114. 10.1111/phpr.2004.69.issue-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epicurus. 1940. “Letter to Menoeceus.” In The Stoic and Epicurean Philosophers, Translated C. Bailey and edited by W. J. Oates, 30–34. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1984. “Harm to Others.” In The Metaphysics of Death, edited by, Fischer, J. M., 171–190. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Feit, Neil. 2002. “The Time of Death’s Misfortune.” Noûs 36 (3): 359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feit, Neil. 2016. “Comparative Harm, Creation, and Death.” Utilitas 28 (2): 136–163. 10.1017/S0953820815000308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Fred. 1991. “Some Puzzles about the Evil of Death.” Reprinted in The Metaphysics of Death, edited by Fischer, J. M., 307–326. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Fred. 1992. Confrontations with the Reaper. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Fred. 2000a. “Basic Intrinsic Value.” Philosophical Studies 99: 319–346. 10.1023/A:1018614917379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Fred. 2000b. “The Termination Thesis.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 24 (1): 98–115. 10.1111/misp.2000.24.issue-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, William. 1999. “Epicurus and the Harm of Death.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (3): 358–364. 10.1080/00048409912349121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heathwood, Chris. 2005. “The Problem of Defective Desires.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (4): 487–504. 10.1080/00048400500338690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heathwood, Chris. 2007. “The Reduction of Sensory Pleasure to Desire.” Philosophical Studies 133: 23–44. 10.1007/s11098-006-9004-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershenov, David B. 2007. “A More Palatable Epicureanism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2): 171–180.Google Scholar
Johansson, Jens. 2012. “The Timing of Death’s Badness.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37: 464–479. 10.1093/jmp/jhs039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Jens. 2013. “The Timing Problem.” In Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Death, edited by Bradley, B., Feldman, F., and Johansson, J., 255–273. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johansson, Jens. 2014. “When Do We Incur Mortal Harm?” In Cambridge Companion to Life and Death, edited by Luper, S., 149–164. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CCO9781139149129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Jack. 1999. “Commentary on Lamont’s ‘When Death Harms its Victims’.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77: 349–357. 10.1080/00048409912349111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Eden. Forthcoming. “Asymmetrism about Desire Satisfactionism and Time.” In Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics (Vol. 7), edited by Timmons, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luper, Steven. 2007. “Mortal Harm.” Philosophical Quarterly 57: 239–251. 10.1111/phiq.2007.57.issue-227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luper, Steven. 2009. The Philosophy of Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. 2002. The Ethics of Killing. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0195079981.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Pitcher, George. 1984. “The Misfortunes of the Dead.” Reprinted in The Metaphysics of Death, edited by Fischer, J. M., 159–168. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Purves, Duncan. 2015. “The Harms of Death.” In Immortality and the Philosophy of Death, edited by Cholbi, Michael. Rowman and Littlfield.Google Scholar
Purves, Duncan. 2016. “Accounting for the Harm of Death.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (1): 89–112. 10.1111/papq.v97.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railton, Peter. 1986. “Facts and Values.” Philosophical Topics 14: 5–31. 10.5840/philtopics19861421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Harry. 2010. “The Time of the Evil of Death.” In Time and Identity, edited by Campbell, Joseph Keim, O’Rourke, Michael, and Silverstein, Harry, 283. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1973. “The Makropoulos Case: Reflections on the Tedium of Immortality.” In Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956–1972, 82–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621253CrossRefGoogle Scholar