No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
J.J. Katz: Language and Other Abstract Objects (Rowman and Little field).
Review products
J.J. Katz: Language and Other Abstract Objects (Rowman and Little field).
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2020
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Critical Notice
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1984
References
Bergmann, G. ‘Comments on Prof. Hempel's “The Concept of Cognitive Significance”.’ In his The Metaphysics of Logical Positivism. First Edition. New York: Longmans, Green, 1954.Google Scholar
Bergmann, G. ‘The Ontology of Edmund Husserl.’ In his Logic and Reality. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Bergmann, G. ‘The Problem of Relations in Classical Psychology.’ Philosophical Quarterly, 7 (1952)Google Scholar
Frege, G. ‘On the Foundations of Geometry.’ Philosophical Review, 69 (1960).10.2307/2182264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, R. ‘Sensory Intuition and the Dogma of Localization.’ In Allaire, E.B. et al. Essays in Ontology. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1963.Google Scholar
Hanson, N.R. The Law of Inertia: A Philosopher's Touchstone.’ Philosophy of Science, 30 (1963)10.1086/287923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ltkonen, Esa. Grammatical Theory and Metascience. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1978.10.1075/cilt.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. ‘Second Thoughts on Paradigms.’ In Suppe, F. The Structure of Scientific Theories. Second Edition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. An Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy. London: Macmillan, 1865. References are to the edition in Vol. ix of his Collected Works. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. Cours de linguistique gén érale. Paris: payot, 1916. Trans. Baskin, W. Course in General Linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library, 1959Google Scholar
Wilson, F. ‘Logical Necessity in Carnap's Later Philosophy.’ In Hausman, A. and Wilson, F. Carnap and Goodman: Two Formalists. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1967.Google Scholar
Wilson, F. ‘Weinberg's Refutation of Nominalism.’ Dialogue, 8 (1969).10.1017/S0012217300041950CrossRefGoogle Scholar