Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T10:00:48.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perception and Imagination in Descartes, Boyle and Hooke

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

J.J. MacIntosh
J.J. MacIntosh*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Descartes, Boyle and Hooke shared, with many other seventeenth-century figures, the view that mechanical explanations were the only intellectually satisfactory ones. They also all accepted the view that we have incorporeal souls. This generated a problem for them when they wrote about perception. In this area, indeed, Descartes seems to be almost a reluctant Cartesian. When we read his scientific writings, the incorporeal soul is not stressed, and Descartes happily speaks of physical, or of corporeal, ideas in discussing sensation, memory and imagination.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 1983 , pp. 327 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This paper incorporates suggestions of A. Rorty, M. Osler, and A. Wylie, to all of whom I am grateful. It has also benefited considerably from the helpful and constructive suggestions of the CJP's referee. This is particularly true of the section on Hooke. Work on this paper was supported by Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Award no. 451-81-3627. Most of the work was done at the University of Auckland while on sabbatical leave from the University of Calgary. I should like to thank the Librarian and library staff of the Royal Society Library, London, for making the Boyle manuscripts available to me on a number of occasions.

References

AT: Adam, C. and Tannery, P. eds., Œuvres de Descartes (Paris 1897-1913)Google Scholar
Bacon: Bacon, Roger Opus Majus, ed. Bridges, J.H. (London 1900; repr. Frankfurt/Main: Minerva G.m.b.H., 1964). (I have used Lindberg's translations in Grant.)Google Scholar
BP: Royal Society Boyle PapersGoogle Scholar
Charleton: Charleton, Walter Physiologia Epicuro-Gassendo-Charltonia, (london 1654; repr. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation 1966)Google Scholar
Cottingham: Cottingham, John Descartes’ Conversation with Burman (Oxford 1976)Google Scholar
Crombie: Crombie, A.C. ‘The Mechanistic Hypothesis and the Scientific Study of Vision…,' in Bradbury, S. and Turner, G.L'E. eds., Historical Aspects of Microsopy, (Cambridge 1967)Google Scholar
Crombie, Crombie, Kepler: A. C. ‘Kepler: De Modo Vision is,’ in Mélanges Alexandre Koyré, vol. I (Paris: Hermann 1964)Google Scholar
Digby: Digby, Sir Kenelm Two Treatises … The Nature of Bodies; … the Nature of Man's Soul … , (1644, repr. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt; Friedrich Frommann Verlag, 1970)Google Scholar
Fulton: Fulton, J.G. A Bibliography of the Honourable Robert Boyle, 2nd ed. (Oxford 1961)Google Scholar
Grant: Grant, Edward ed., A Source Book in Mediaeval Science, (Cambridge, MA 1974)Google Scholar
Gunther: Gunther, R.T. Early Science in Oxford, Vol. VII, The Life and Work of Robert Hooke, part II (Oxford 1930)Google Scholar
Hall: Hall, T.S. R. Descartes: Treatise of Man (Cambridge, MA 1972)Google Scholar
Hooke: Hooke, Robert Collected Works, ed. Waller, R. (London 1705; repr. Hildesheim; Georg Olms 1970)Google Scholar
HR: Haldane, E.S. and Ross, G.R.T. The Philosophical Works of Descartes, (Cambridge 1931)Google Scholar
Kargon: Kargon, R.H. Atomism in England from Hariot to Newton (Oxford 1966)Google Scholar
Kenny 1968: Kenny, A. Descartes (New York 1968)Google Scholar
Kenny 1970, Kenny, A. Descartes — Philosophical Letters (Oxford 1970)Google Scholar
Kepler Dioptrice: Kepler, Johannes Dioptrice (Augustae Vindelicorum 1611, repr. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons, Ltd. 1962)Google Scholar
Kepler Paralipomena: Kepler, Johannes Ad Vitellionem Paralipomena … (Frankfurt 1604; repr. Bruxelles: Culture et Civilisation 1968) (I have used Lindberg's translations in Lindberg. For a translation of a larger section of the work see Crombie, Kepler.)Google Scholar
Lindberg: Lindberg, David C. Theories of Vision from AI-Kindi to Kepler (london 1976)Google Scholar
Olscamp: Olscamp, Paul J. R. Descartes: Discourse on Method, Optics, Geometry and Meteorology (Indianapolis 1965)Google Scholar
Pecham: Lindberg, David C. John Pecham and the Science of Optics: Perspectiva Communis, (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1970)Google Scholar
RB: Boyle, Robert The Works, ed. Birch, Thomas (London 1772; repr. Hildesheim; Georg Olms 1965)Google Scholar
S: Stewart, M.A. ed., Selected Philosophical Papers of Robert Boyle (Manchester 1979)Google Scholar
Stewart Authenticity: Stewart, M.A. ‘The Authenticity of Robert Boyle's Anonymous Writings on Reason,’ Bodleian Library Record, 10.5 (August 1981) 280–9Google Scholar
Westfall: Westfall, Richard S. ‘Unpublished Boyle Papers Relating to Scientific Method. - II,’ Annals of Science, 12 (1956) 103–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yolton: Yolton, John W. ‘As in a Looking Glass: Perceptual Acquaintance in EighteenthCentury Britain,’ Journal of the History of Ideas, 40 (1979) 207–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar