Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:04:25.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Goodman

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Timothy Williamson
Timothy Williamson*
Affiliation:
Wykeham Professor of Logic, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
*
Email: timothy.williamson@philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 46 , Issue 4-5: Special Issue: Williamson on Modality , August 2016 , pp. 640 - 653
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carnap, Rudolf. 1947. Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fritz, Peter, and Goodman, Jeremy. Forthcoming. “Counting Incompossibles.” Mind.Google Scholar
Goodman, Jeremy. 2016. “Williamson on Necessitism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46(4–5): 614–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 2012. Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2013. Modal Logic as Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552078.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2016a. “Modal Science.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46(4–5): 453–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2016b. “Model-building in Philosophy.” In Philosophy's Future: The Problem of Philosophical Progress, edited by Blackford, Russell and Broderick, Damien. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar