Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:06:29.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reply to Vetter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Timothy Williamson*
Affiliation:
Wykeham Professor of Logic, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Edgington, Dorothy. 2008. “Counterfactuals.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108: 121. 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2008.00233.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roca-Royes, Sonia. Forthcoming. “Similarity and Possibility: An Epistemology of De Re Possibility for Concrete Entities.” In Modal Epistemology after Rationalism, edited by Fischer, Bob and Leon, Felipe.Springer, Synthese Library.Google Scholar
Strohminger, Margot. 2015. “Perceptual Knowledge of Nonactual Possibilities.” Philosophical Perspectives 29: 363375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetter, Barbara. 2015. Potentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714316.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetter, Barbara. 2016. “Williamsonian Modal Epistemology, Possibility-based.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46(4–5): 727756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2007. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2013. Modal Logic as Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552078.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2016a. “Knowing by Imagining.” In Knowledge through Imagination, edited by Kind, Amy and Kung, Peter, 113123. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2016b. “Modal Science.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46(4–5): 453492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar