Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T17:18:39.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking the Asymmetry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Richard Yetter Chappell Open the ORCID record for Richard Yetter Chappell [Opens in a new window]
Richard Yetter Chappell*
Affiliation:
University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
*
Email: r.chappell@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to the Asymmetry, we’ve strong moral reason to prevent miserable lives from coming into existence, but no moral reason to bring happy lives into existence. This procreative asymmetry is often thought to be part of commonsense morality, however theoretically puzzling it might prove to be. I argue that this is a mistake. The Asymmetry is merely prima facie intuitive, and loses its appeal on further reflection. Mature commonsense morality recognizes no fundamental procreative asymmetry. It may recognize some superficially similar theses, but we will see that they derive from more familiar principles, and are compatible with there being moral reason to bring happy lives into existence.

Keywords

Asymmetrypopulation ethicspartialitydemandingnessvariabilismactualism
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 47 , Issue 2-3: Special issue: Ethics and Future Generations , 2017 , pp. 167 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hare, Caspar. 2007. “Voices From Another World: Must We Respect the Interests of People Who Do Not, and Will Never, Exist?” Ethics 117 (3): 498–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Elizabeth. 2009. “I’ll Be Glad I Did It" Reasoning and the Significance of Future Desires.” Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1): 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurka, Thomas. 1983. “Value and Population Size.” Ethics 93 (3): 496–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. 2009. “Asymmetries in the Morality of Causing People to Exist”. In Harming Future Persons, edited by Wasserman, David & Roberts, Melinda, 49–68. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1997. “Equality and Priority.” Ratio 10 (3): 202–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piller, Christian. 2014. “What Is Goodness Good For?”. In Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, 4 vols. edited by Timmons, Mark. Springer.Google Scholar
Roberts, Melinda. 2011. “An Asymmetry in the Ethics of Procreation.” Philosophy Compass 6 (11): 765–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Peter. 2011. Practical Ethics. 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar