Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:55:29.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alfred R. Mele Springs of Action: Understanding Intentional Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press 1992. Pp. ix + 272.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Ishtiyaque Haji*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Morris, MN, 56267, USA

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Critical Notice
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 On Frankfurt-type cases, cf. Harry, G. Frankfurt’sAlternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility,’ Journal of Philosophy 66 (1969) 828-39.Google Scholar

2 For discussion of a contrary intuition, cf. Harry, G. FrankfurtFreedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person,’ Journal of Philosophy 68 (1971) 5-20Google Scholar.

3 Holly, SmithVarieties of Moral Worth and Moral Credit,’ Ethics 101 (1991) 279-303Google Scholar; David, WiderkerFrankfurt on “Ought Implies Can” and Moral Responsibility,’ Analysis 51 (1991) 222-4Google Scholar

4 Ishtiyaque, HajiAlternative Possibilities, Moral Obligation and Moral Responsibility,’ Philosophical Papers 22 (1993) 41-50Google Scholar

5 See John, M. Fischer’sResponsibility and Failure,’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 86 (1985/86) 251-70Google Scholar; and John, M. Fischer and Mark, Ravizza’sResponsibility and Inevitability,’ Ethics 101 (1991) 258-78.Google Scholar

6 Discussions germane to the asymmetry thesis can be found in my ‘A Riddle Regarding Omissions,’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 22 (1992) 485-502; in Michael, Zimmerman An Essay on Moral Responsibility (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield 1988)Google Scholar; and in Fisher and Ravizza, ‘Responsibility and Inevitability.’

7 For an excellent discussion on akratic action, cf. Alfred, R. Mele’s Irrationality: An Essay on Self-Deception and Self-Control (New York: Oxford University Press 1987)Google Scholar.

8 The example is from Irrationality, 22.

9 John Christman’s anthology The Inner Citadel (New York: Oxford University Press 1989) contains instructive essays on hierarchical and other theories of autonomy.

10 For a study on the relevance of higher order desires to understanding akratic action, cf. Alfred, R. Mele’sAkrasia, Self-Control, and Second-Order Desires,’ Nous 26 (1992) 281-302.Google Scholar

11 Mele suggests, as well, that since many of our intentions are formed, in significant part, on the basis of our assessment of the objects of our wants, it is not surprising that an agent may intend to A and yet not be most motivated to A.