Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:47:53.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Causal Principle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Raymond D. Bradley
Raymond D. Bradley*
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Philosophical theses are sometimes assailed from so many sides that, even if they have not been refuted, it becomes difficult for them to gain a fair hearing. A case in point seems to be the thesis that the sentence ‘Every event has a cause' (commonly known as the Causal Principle) may on occasion be used to assert something which, as a matter of contingent fact, is either true or false. In the interests of logical chivalry, I want to take up its defence.

My aim, it should be noted, is not to defend the truth of the Causal Principle, to claim that our world is one in which every event is causally determined by another event or set of events. So I shall have nothing to say about the arguments of those who—like the quantum physicists, Heisenberg, Bohr, and Born—claim to have shown that the Causal Principle is false; claim, that is, that our world is fundamentally indeterministic. My concern is only to establish the right of determinists and indeterminists alike to take seriously the question whether our world is in fact one in which every event has a cause.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , September 1974 , pp. 97 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Vendler, in Butler, R. J. (ed.), Analytical Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1962), p. 13.Google Scholar

2 Analysis, Vol. X (1950).

3 “Every Event has a Cause,” Logic and Language, Series 2, ed. Flew, A. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1953).Google Scholar

4 Hospers, J. An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis (1st ed.; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1956).Google Scholar

5 Pap, A. Elements of Analytic Philosophy (New York: Macmillan, 1949).Google Scholar

6 Ayer, A. J. The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge (London: Macmillan, 1940).Google Scholar

7 Blanshard, B. The Nature of Thought, Vols. I and II (London: Allen and Unwin, 1939).Google Scholar

8 Ducasse, C. J. “Determinism, Freedom, and Responsibility,” in Determinism and Freedom in the Age of Modern Science, ed. Hook, S. (New York: New York University Press, 1958)Google Scholar.

9 “On the Notion of Cause,” in Mysticism and Logic (New York: Doubleday, 1957).

10 Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, Kemp (London: Macmillan, 1950).Google Scholar

11 Analytical Philosophy, ed. Butler, R. J. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1962), p. 13.Google Scholar

12 Analytical Philosophy, ed. Butler, R. J. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1962).Google Scholar