No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
David Rubinstein, Marx and Wittgenstein: Social Praxis and Social Explanation (London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981). Pp., viii + 231.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2020
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Critical Notice
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Authors 1985
References
1 Marx, Thesis VIII, ‘Theses on Feuerbach,’ in McLellan, David ed., Karl Marx: Selected Writings (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1977), 157Google Scholar
2 Rossi-Landi, F. ‘Towards a Marxian Use of Wittgenstein,’ in Nyíri, J.C. ed., Austrian Philosophy: Studies and Texts (Munich: Philosophia Verlag 1981) 113–49Google Scholar
3 Marx, Capital, Vol. I, in McLellan, 422Google Scholar
4 I recommend on these questions a work not available to Rubinstein: Fania Pascal's ‘Wittgenstein, a Personal Memoir,’ in Rhees, Rush ed., Ludwig Wittgenstein: Personal Recollections (Oxford: Blackwell 1981) 26–62.Google Scholar ‘It is inane to affix any political label to him,’ she says (57), and explains very clearly why. See also her account of Wittgenstein's close friendship with the ‘fiery communist,’ Dr. Nicholas Bachtin (28 ff.).
5 Wittgenstein, L. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, tr., Anscombe, G.E.M. (Oxford: Blackwell 1964) 57.Google Scholar
6 Fann, K.T. ‘Wittgenstein and Bourgeois Philosophy,’ Radical Philosophy, 8 (1974) 24–7.Google Scholar
7 Fann, 27, quoting from The German Ideology.
8 Marx, Preface to A Critique of Political Economy, in McLellan, 390, my italics
9 Benton, Ted ‘Winch, Wittgenstein and Marx,’ Radical Philosophy, 13 (1976) 1–6Google Scholar
10 Winch, Peter The Idea of a Social Science, and its Relation to Philosophy (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1958) 23–4Google Scholar
11 See Wittgenstein, L. ‘Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough,’ Synthese, 17 (1969) 233–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Compare Winch: ‘I do not wish to maintain that we must stop at the unreflective kind of understanding … but I do want to say that any more reflective understanding must necessarily presuppose … the participant's unreflective understanding’ (89).
13 Marx, The German Ideology, in McLellan, 167Google Scholar
14 Wittgenstein, L. Zettel, ed. Anscombe, G.E.M. and Wright, G.H. von (Oxford: Blackwell 1967) 567Google Scholar
15 McLellan, 390
16 See, e.g., Singer, Peter Marx (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1980) 39.Google Scholar
17 Wittgenstein, L. Culture and Value, tr. Winch, Peter (Oxford: Blackwell 1980) 60.Google Scholar I am grateful to Professor K.R. Fischer and Dr. Ludwig Nagl for advice on these topics.