Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:26:14.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hume, a Scottish Locke? Comments on Terence Penelhum’s Hume

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Donald C. Ainslie
Donald C. Ainslie*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto, 170 St. George Street, Toronto, ONM5R 2M8, Canada
*
*Email: donald.ainslie@utoronto.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Where Terence Penelhum sees a deep continuity between John Locke's theory of ideas and David Hume's theory of perceptions, I argue that the two philosophers disagree over some fundamental issues in the philosophy of mind. While Locke treats ideas as imagistic objects that we recognize as such by a special kind of inner consciousness, Hume thinks that we do not normally recognize the imagistic content of our perceptions, and instead unselfconsciously take ourselves to sense a shared public world. My disagreement with Penelhum over Hume's debt to Locke helps to explain our disagreement over the nature of Hume's scepticism.

Keywords

HumeLockePenelhumideaperceptionscepticism
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 42 , Issue S1: Hume in Alberta: Selected Papers from the 2012 Hume Conference in Calgary , February 2012 , pp. 161 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainslie, Donald C. 2001. “Hume's Reflections on the Simplicity and Identity of Mind.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62: 557–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainslie, Donald C. 2003. “Hume, a Scottish Socrates? Critical Notice of Terence Penelhum's Themes in Hume.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33: 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Samuel 1731. A Letter to Mr. Dodwell; &c. 6thed. London: James and John Knapton.Google Scholar
Downing, Lisa 1998. “The Status of Mechanism in Locke's Essay.” Philosophical Review 107: 381–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriegel, Uriah and Coventry, Angela 2008. “Locke on Consciousness.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 25: 221–242.Google Scholar
Penelhum, Terence 1975. Hume. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penelhum, Terence 1992. David Hume: An Introduction to His Philosophical System. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Penelhum, Terence 2000. Themes in Hume: The Self, the Will, Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Shelley 2008. “The Coherence of Consciousness in Locke's Essay.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 25: 21–40.Google Scholar