Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:28:31.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hume’s atheism and the role of Cleanthes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Terence Penelhum
Terence Penelhum*
Affiliation:
Department of Religious Studies, University of Calgary, 5604 Baroc Rd NW, Calgary, ABT3A 4R2, Canada
*
*Email: penelhum@ucalgary.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This is a reply to Willem Lemmens’ discussion of my interpretation of the Dialogues on Natural Religion in my 2000 collection Themes from Hume: Self, Will, Religion. I use Lemmens’ careful textual analysis to clarify my considered position and to further the reading of Part 12 of the Dialogues.

Keywords

Humetrue religionsuperstitionreligious scepticismTerence Penelhum
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 42 , Issue S1: Hume in Alberta: Selected Papers from the 2012 Hume Conference in Calgary , February 2012 , pp. 206 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gaskin, J. C. A. 1983. “Hume's Attenuated Deism.” Archiv Für Gestichte der Philosophie 65 (2): 160–173.Google Scholar
Hume, David 1948. Dialogues concerning Natural Religion. Edited by Smith, Norman Kemp 2nd ed. New York: Social Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Hume, David 2007. A Dissertation on the Passions and the Natural History of Religion. Edited by Beauchamp, Tom L. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Penelhum, Terence 2008. “Hume's Views on Religion: Intellectual and Cultural Influences.” In A Companion to Hume, edited by Radcliffe, Elizabeth S. 323–337. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Penelhum, Terence 2000. Themes in Hume: The Self, the Will, Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar