Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:20:42.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Internal and external

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Charles R. Beitz
Charles R. Beitz*
Affiliation:
University Center for Human Values, Princeton University, 302 Marx Hall, Princeton, NJ08540, USA
*
*Email: cbeitz@princeton.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

James's Fairness in Trade seeks to offer an account of fair trade that is “internal” to an existing practice he describes as “mutual market reliance.” This paper distinguishes several senses of the distinction between “internal” and “external” that occur in the book and asks how, in its various senses, the distinction shapes and influences judgments about the fairness of the practice.

Keywords

fairnesstradeglobal justicepracticeinternal
Type
Author meets Critic
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 225 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayhan Kose, M., Prasad, Eswar, Rogoff, Kenneth, and Wei, Shang-Jin. 2009. “Financial Globalization: A Reappraisal.” IMF Staff Papers 56: 8–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, Charles R. 2009. The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1985. “Law as Interpretation.” In A Matter of Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Part 2.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gowa, Joanne, and Raymond, Hicks. Forthcoming. “Conflict and Commerce: New Data About the Great War.”Google Scholar
Irwin, Douglas A., Mavroidis, Petros C., and Sykes, Alan O.. 2008. The Genesis of the GATT, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Aaron. 2005. “Constructing Justice for Existing Practice: Rawls and the Status Quo.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 33: 281–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Aaron. 2012. Fairness in Practice: A Social Contract for a Global Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward M., and Pollins, Brian M., eds. 2003. Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Richard W. 2010. Globalizing Justice: The Ethics of Poverty and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999 [1955]. “Two Concepts of Rules.” In Collected Papers, edited by Freeman, Samuel, 20–46. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999 [1958]. “Justice as Fairness.” In Collected Papers, edited by Samuel, Freeman, 47–72. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph. 2000. “Capital Market Liberalization, Economic Growth, and Instability.” World Development 28: 1075–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar