Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:44:26.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant on the Continuity of Alterations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2019

Tim Jankowiak
Tim Jankowiak*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Towson University, Towson, Maryland, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The metaphysical “Law of Continuity of Alterations” (“LCA”) says that whenever an object alters from one state to another, it passes through a continuum of intermediate states. Kant treated LCA as a transcendental law of understanding. The primary purpose of the paper is to reconstruct and evaluate Kant’s three arguments for LCA. All three are found to be inadequate. However, a secondary goal of the paper is to show that LCA would have more naturally been construed as a regulative principle of reason (rather than a law of understanding). I conclude with some remarks about how this could work.

Keywords

Kantcontinuityalterationstimecausationregulative principles
Type
Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 49 - 66
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Canadian Journal of Philosophy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, Jonathan. 1966. Kant’s Analytic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan. 1974. Kant’s Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bernoulli, Johannes. 1727. Discours sur les loix de la communication du mouvement. Paris: Chez Claude Jombert.Google Scholar
Bird, Graham. 2006. The Revolutionary Kant. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Boscovich, Rogerio. 1754. De continuitatis lege et eius consectariis pertinentibus ad prima materiae elementa eorumque vires. Rome: Generosi Salomoni.Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann. 1883. Das Princip der Infinitesimal-Methode und seine Geschichte. Berlin: Ferd. Dümmlers Verlangsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann. 1885. Kants Theorie der Erfahrung. 2nd rev. ed. Berlin: Ferd. Dümmlers Verlangsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. 1924. Kant’s Treatment of Causality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. 2013. Kant’s Construction of Nature: A Reading of the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 1987. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 1990. “Reason and Reflective Judgment: Kant on the Significance of Systematicity.” Noûs 24 (1): 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jankowiak, Tim. 2013. “Kant’s Argument for the Principle of Intensive Magnitudes.” Kantian Review 18 (3): 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1992a. “Inaugural Dissertation.” In Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770, translated and edited by Walford, David, 373–416. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1992b. “Attempt to Introduce the Concept of Negative Magnitudes into Philosophy.” In Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770, translated and edited by Walford, David, 203-241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1997a. “Metaphysik Dohna.” In Lectures on Metaphysics, translated and edited by Ameriks, Karl and Naragon, Steve, 357–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1997b. “Metaphysik L1.” In Lectures on Metaphysics, translated and edited by Ameriks, Karl and Naragon, Steve, 19–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1997c. “Metaphysik Mrongovius.” In Lectures on Metaphysics, translated and edited by Ameriks, Karl and Naragon, Steve, 109–286. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1997d. “Metaphysik Vigilantius.” In Lectures on Metaphysics, translated and edited by Ameriks, Karl and Naragon, Steve, 417–506. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, translated and edited by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2002a. “Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science.” In Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, translated by Friedman, Michael, edited by Allison, Henry and Heath, Peter, 171–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2002b. “Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics.” In Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, translated by Friedman, Michael, edited by Allison, Henry and Heath, Peter, 29–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2012a. “New Doctrine of Motion and Rest.” In Natural Science, translated by Reinhardt, Olaf, edited by Watkins, Eric, 396–408. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2012b. “Thoughts on the True Estimation of Living Forces.” In Natural Science, translated by Edwards, Jeffrey and Schönfeld, Martin, edited by Watkins, Eric, 1–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kemp Smith, Norman. 1918. A Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. London: MacMillan and Co. Limited.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1989. “A Specimen of Dynamics.” In Philosophical Writings, translated and edited by Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel, 117–37. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1996. New Essays on Human Understanding. Translated and edited by Remnant, Peter and Bennett, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughland, Peter. 2014. “Transcendental Presuppositions and Ideas of Reason.” Kant-Studien 105 (4): 554–72.Google Scholar
McNulty, Michael Bennett. 2015. “Rehabilitating the Regulative Use of Reason: Kant on Empirical and Chemical Laws.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 54 (December): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNulty, Michael Bennett. 2019. “Continuity of Change in Kant’s Dynamics.” Synthese 196 (4): 1595–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paton, H. J. 1936. Kant’s Metaphysics of Experience Vol. II. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Reimarus, Hermann. 1766. Die vornehmsten Wahrheiten der Natürlichen Religion. Hamburg: Johann Carl Boyn.Google Scholar
Rush, Fred. 2000. “Reason and Regulation in Kant.” Review of Metaphysics 53 (4): 837–62.Google Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio. 1963. “The Law of Continuity in the Eighteenth Century.” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 27: 1619–38.Google Scholar
Warren, Daniel. 2001a. “Kant’s Dynamics.” In Kant and the Sciences, edited by Watkins, Eric, 93–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Daniel. 2001b. Reality and Impenetrability in Kant’s Philosophy of Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. 2001. “Kant on Rational Cosmology.” In Kant and the Sciences, edited by Watkins, Eric, 70–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric. 2005. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar