Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:48:58.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Necessity and Identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

L. F. Goble
L. F. Goble*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Quine and others have put many problems to quantified modal logic. Their purpose is to show the logic to be paradoxical or at least very peculiar. Many of these problems center around the interplay between modality, quantification and identity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , September 1972 , pp. 55 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fitch, F. B. “The Problem of the Morning Star and the Evening Star,” reprinted in Copi & Gould, Contemporary Readings in Logical Theory, New York, 1967, pp. 273-278.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. “Modes of Modality,” Acta Philosophica Fennica, v. 16 (1963), pp. 65-82.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. E. & Cresswell, M. ). An Introduction to Modal Logic, London, 1968.Google Scholar
Kanger, S. “The Morning Star Paradox,” Theoria, v. 23 (1957), pp. 1-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. “Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic,” Acta Philosophica Fennica, v. 16 (1963), pp. 83-94.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. Correspondence with Arnauld, trans. Montgomery, G. R. LaSalle, Illinois, 1962.Google Scholar
Linsky, L. “Substitutivity and Descriptions,” Journal of Philosophy, v. 63 (1966), pp. 673-683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, A. “De Re et De Dicto,” Nous, v. 3 (1969), pp. 235-258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. “Reply to Professor Marcus,” reprinted in [11], pp. 175-183.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. “The Problem of Interpreting Modal Logic,” journal of Symbolic Logic, v. 12 (1947), pp. 43-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. The Ways of Paradox, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. “Three Grades of Modal Involvement,” reprinted in [11], pp. 156-174.Google Scholar
Smullyan, A. “Modality and Description,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, v. 13 (1948), pp. 31-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smullyan, A. Review of Quine [10], Journal of Symbolic Logic, v. 12 (1947), pp. 139-141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. & Russell, B. Principia Mathematica, Cambridge, 2nd ed. 1923, vol. I.Google Scholar