Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:52:51.459Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Practical reasoning and practical knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Rowland Stout
Rowland Stout*
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, University College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The judgement that provides the content of intention and coincides with the conclusion of practical reasoning is a normative judgement about what to do, and not, as Anscombe and McDowell argue, a factual judgement about what one is doing. Treating the conclusion of practical reasoning as expressing a recommendation rather than a verdict undermines McDowell’s argument; the special nature of practical reasoning does not preclude its conclusions being normative. Anscombe’s and McDowell’s claim that practical self-knowledge is productive of action may be accommodated by identifying the content of practical knowledge not with the conclusion but with a premise of practical reasoning – a kind of practical reasoning that occurs within rather than before action.

Keywords

Practical reasoningpractical knowledgeintention in actionAnscombeMcDowell
Type
Critical Notice
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , June 2019 , pp. 564 - 579
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anscombe, G. E. M., 1957. Intention. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T., 1947. Summa Theologica. New York, NY: Benziger Bros.Google Scholar
Brandom, R., 1994. Making It Explicit. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R., 2001. Articulating Reasons. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D., 1980. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hare, R., 1963. Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, G., 1989. Change in View. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, J., 2002. “Practical Realism?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 64 (1): 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellie, B., 2016. “Obligation and Aspect. ” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 59 (4): 398–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, J., 2015. Action, Knowledge and Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J., 1979. “Virtue and Reason. ” Monist, 62 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J., 2010. “What is the Content of an Intention in Action. ” Ratio, 23 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, E., 2012. Rational Causation. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, A., 1992. Springs of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moran, R., 2004. “Anscombe on ‘Practical Knowledge“ In Agency and Action. edited by Hyman, John and Steward, Helen, 43–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rödl, S., 2007. Self-Consciousness. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rödl, S., 2010. “The Form of the Will“ In Desire, Practical Reason and the Good. edited by Tenenbaum, Sergio, 138–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rödl, S., 2011. “Two Forms of Practical Knowledge and Their Unity“ In Essays on Anscombe’s Intention. edited by Ford, Anton, et al., 211–241. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, W., 1966. “Thought and Action“ In Freedom and Determinism. edited by Lehrer, Keith, 105–139. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Stout, R., 2006. The Inner Life of a Rational Agent. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, R., 2018. “Ballistic Actions“ In Process, Action and Experience, edited by Rowland Stout. 210–228. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, S., 2007. “The Conclusion of Practical Reason“ In Moral Psychology. edited by Tenenbaum, S., 323–343. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, S., ed. 2010. Desire, Practical Reason and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M., 2008. Life and Action. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar