Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:32:41.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self Visitation, Traveler Time, and Compatible Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2019

John W. Carroll
John W. Carroll*
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC27695, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Introduction

Ted Sider aptly and concisely states the self-visitation paradox thus: ‘Suppose I travel back in time and stand in a room with my sitting 10-year-old self. I seem to be both sitting and standing, but how can that be?’ (2001, 101). I will explore a relativist resolution of this paradox offered by, or on behalf of, endurantists. It maintains that the sitting and the standing are relative to the personal time or proper time of the time traveler and is intended to yield the result that Ted is sitting at a certain initial personal/proper time but is not standing relative to that time. Similarly, it is also supposed to yield that Ted is standing relative to a later personal/proper time, but not sitting relative to that time. Such a traveler-time relativism has been offered by Paul Horwich (1975, 433-5; 1987, 114-15) and also by Simon Keller and Michael Nelson (2001, 344). I will show that this relativist approach is a non-starter. It is so because Ted is sitting and standing at both the initial and the later personal/proper time.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 359 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ehring, D. 1987. ‘Personal Identity and Time Travel.’ Philosophical Studies 52: 427–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwich, P. 1975. ‘On Some Alleged Paradoxes of Time Travel.’ Journal of Philosophy 72: 432–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwich, P. 1987. Asymmetries in Time. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.Google Scholar
Keller, S. and Nelson, M.. 2001. ‘Presentists Should Believe in Time Travel.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79: 333–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. 1976. ‘The Paradoxes of Time Travel.’ American Philosophical Quarterly 13: 145–52.Google Scholar
Markosian, N. 2004. ‘Two Arguments From Sider's Four-Dimensionalism.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68: 665–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, K. 2006. ‘Traveling in Time: How to Wholly Exist in Two Places at the Same Time.’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36: 309–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, T. 2001. Four Dimensionalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, J. 2005. ‘Is Time Travel a Problem for the Three-Dimensionalist?’ Monist 88: 353–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar