Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:33:06.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What the Liberal State Should Tolerate Within Its Borders1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Andrew Jason Cohen
Andrew Jason Cohen*
Affiliation:
Georgia State University, AtlantaGA30302-4089, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I have previously argued that toleration is best understood as an agent's intentional and principled refraining from interfering with an opposed other (or their behavior, etc.) in situations of diversity, where the agent believes she has the power to interfere (see my 2004a). Though I think this is the best available definition, it is only a definition and presents no normative claims about when toleration is warranted — i.e., about what is to be tolerated. As Peter Nicholson notes, ‘Toleration as a moral ideal cannot be value-neutral, and for this reason too it must be distinguished from the descriptive concept of toleration which can and should be valueneutral’ (1985, 161). Having previously offered a value-neutral account of the descriptive concept, I use that analysis here to discuss the moral ideal.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 479 - 513
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barry, B. 2001. Culture and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Battin, M. 1999. ‘Euthanasia: The Way We Do It, The Way They Do It.’ Reprinted in Ethical Issues in Modern Medicine, fifth edition, Arras, J. and Steinbock, B. eds. New York, NY: Mayfield. 280–92.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. 1994. ‘Liberalism and Group Rights.’ In In Harm's Way: Essays in Honor of Joel Feinberg, Coleman, J. and Buchanan, A. eds. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 1–15.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. and Brock, D.W.. 1986. ‘Deciding for Others: Competency.’ Milbank Quarterly 64 (1986): 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A.J. 2004a. ‘What Toleration Is.’ Ethics 115 (2004): 68–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A.J. 2004b. ‘Defending Liberalism Against the Anomie Challenge.’ Social Theory and Practice 30 (2004): 391–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A.J. 1999. ‘Communitarianism, ‘Social Constitution,’ and Autonomy.’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1999): 121–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A.J. 1998. ‘A Defense of Strong Voluntarism.’ American Philosophical Quarterly 35 (1998): 251–65.Google Scholar
Dees, R. H. 1995. ‘The Justification of Tolerance.’ In Values and Public Life: An Interdisciplinary Study, Magill, G. and Hoff, M.D.. Lanham, eds. Maryland: University Press of America. 29–56.Google Scholar
Driver, J. 1992. ‘The Suberogatory.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 (1992): 286–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R. 2000. Case and Materials on Torts. Seventh Edition. New York, NY: Aspen Law.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. 1986. Harm to Self. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. 1984. Harm to Others. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, D. 1993a. ‘Autonomy as a Good: Liberalism, Autonomy, and Toleration.’ Journal of Political Philosophy 1 (1993): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, D. 1993b. ‘Liberal Neutrality, Traditional Minorities and Education.’ In Liberalism, Multiculturalism and Toleration, ed. Horton, J.. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press. 50–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, W.A. 1995. ‘Two Concepts of Liberalism.’ Ethics 105 (1995): 516–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, J. 1989. ‘Should Political Philosophy Be Done without Metaphysics?’ Ethics 99 (1989): 791–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1976. ‘Ethical Theory and Utilitarianism.’ In Contemporary British Philosophy, Fourth Series. London, UK: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1972. Essays on the Moral Concepts. London, UK: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Harel, A. 1996. ‘The Boundaries of Justifiable Tolerance: A Liberal Perspective.’ In Toleration: An Elusive Virtue, Heyd, D. ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 114–26.Google Scholar
Horton, J. 1985. ‘Toleration, morality and harm.’ In Aspects of Toleration: Philosophical Studies, Horton, J. and Mendus, S. eds. London, UK: Methuen. 113–35.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1777. ‘Of the Original Contract’ in Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary. Miller, E. ed. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics, 1985. 465–87.Google Scholar
Kukathas, C. 2003. The Liberal Archipelago. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukathas, C. 1997. ‘Cultural Toleration.’ In Nomos 39: Ethnicity and Group Rights, Shapiro, I. and Kymlicka, Will eds. New York, NY: New York University Press. 69–104.Google Scholar
Kukathas, C. 1992. ‘Are there any Cultural Rights?’ Political Theory 20 (1992): 105–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. 1992. ‘The Rights of Minority Cultures: Reply to Kukathas.’ Political Theory 20 (1992): 140–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W. 1989. Liberalism, Community and Culture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1865. ‘A Letter concerning Toleration.’ In Political Writings of John Locke, Wooten, D. ed.; Popple, W. tr. New York, NY: Penguin Books, 1993. 390–436.Google Scholar
Lomasky, L. 1987. Persons, Rights, and the Moral Community. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macedo, S. 1995. ‘Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism: The Case of God v. John Rawls?’ Ethics 105 (1995): 468–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, L. 1987. The Morality of Groups: Collective Responsibility, Group-based Harm, and Corporate Rights. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
McConnell, T. 2000. Inalienable Rights: The Limits of Consent in Medicine and the Law. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mendus, S. 1989. Toleration and the Limits of Liberalism. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, D. T. 1989. Self, Society and Personal Choice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1859. On Liberty. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1978.Google Scholar
Mills, C. 2003. ‘The Child's Right to an Open Future?’ Journal of Social Philosophy 134 (2003): 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C. 1998. ‘Choice and Circumstance.’ Ethics 109 (1998): 154–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narveson, J. 1991. ‘Collective Rights?’ The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 4 (1991): 329–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, B. 1962. An Introduction to Roman Law. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, P. P. 1985. ‘Toleration as a moral ideal.’ In Aspects of Toleration: Philosophical Studies, Horton, J. and Mendus, S. eds. London, UK: Methuen. 158–73.Google Scholar
Oberdiek, H. 2001. Tolerance: Between Forbearance and Acceptance. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Okin, S. M. 2002. ‘‘‘Mistresses of Their Own Destiny’’: Group Rights, Gender, and Realistic Rights of Exit.’ Ethics 112 (2002): 205–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, S. M. 1999. ‘Is Multiculturalism Bad For Women?’ In Is Multiculturalism Bad For Women? Cohen, J. Howard, M. and Nussbaum, M. eds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 9–24.Google Scholar
Okin, S. M. 1998. ‘Feminism and Multiculturalism: Some Tensions.’ Ethics 108 (1998): 661–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999a. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999b. Collected Papers. Freeman, S. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1989. ‘The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus.’ In Collected Papers, Freeman, S. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 473–96.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1988. ‘The Priority of the Right and Ideas of The Good.’ In Collected Papers, Freeman, S. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 449–72.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1987. ‘The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus.’ In Collected Papers, Freeman, S. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 421–48.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1985. ‘Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical.’ In Collected Papers, Freeman, S. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 388–414.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1963. ‘Constitutional Liberty and the Concept of Justice.’ In Collected Papers, Freeman, S. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 73–95.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1988. ‘Autonomy, Toleration, and the Harm Principle.’ In Justifying Toleration: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives, ed. Mendus, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 155–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1991. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers Vol. I. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T.M. 1996. ‘The Difficulty of Tolerance.’ In Toleration: An Elusive Virtue, Heyd, D. ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 226–39.Google Scholar
Schmidtz, D. 2006. Elements of Justice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selznick, P. 1995. ‘Personhood and Moral Obligation.’ In New Communitarian Thinking: Persons, Virtues, Institutions, and Communities, Etzioni, A. ed. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia. 110–25.Google Scholar
Shachar, A. 2001. Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women's Rights. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shachar, A. 2000. ‘On Citizenship and Multicultural Vulnerability.’ Political Theory 28 (2000): 64–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shue, H. 1980. Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy, second edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spinner-Halev, J. 2000. Surviving Diversity: Religion and Democratic Citizenship. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Steinbock, B. and McClamrock, R.. 1999. ‘When is Birth Unfair to the Child?’ Reprinted in Ethical Issues in Modern Medicine, fifth edition, Arras, J. and Steinbock, B. eds. New York, NY: Mayfield. 388–97.Google Scholar
Tan, K. 1998. ‘Liberal Toleration in Rawls's Law of Peoples.’ Ethics 108 (1998): 276–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ten, C. L. 1980. Mill On Liberty. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasi, J. 1995. ‘Kymlicka, Liberalism, and Respect for Cultural Minorities.’ Ethics 105 (1995): 580–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. 1995. ‘Minority Cultures and the Cosmopolitan Alternative.’ Reprinted in The Rights of Minority Cultures, Kymlicka, W. ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 93–122.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. 1997. On Toleration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Warnock, M. 1987. ‘The Limits of Toleration.’ In On Toleration, Mendus, S. and Edwards, D. eds. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. 123–40.Google Scholar
Wellman, C. H. 2005. A Theory of Secession: The Case for Political Self-Determination. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar