Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:21:22.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Back to the Future? Making Sense of the 2004 Canadian Election outside Quebec

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2006

Elisabeth Gidengil ,
André Blais ,
Joanna Everitt ,
Patrick Fournier  and
Neil Nevitte
Elisabeth Gidengil
Affiliation:
McGill University
André Blais
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Joanna Everitt
Affiliation:
University of New Brunswick
Patrick Fournier
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Neil Nevitte
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. This paper uses data from the 2004 Canadian Election Study to analyze the factors that motivated a vote for each party and to identify the ones that mattered most to the outcome of the 2004 federal election outside Quebec. Particular attention is given to the impact of the sponsorship scandal, the sources of support for the new Conservative party and the factors that explain the NDP's improved performance. The findings are used to address some basic questions about the 2004 election and its larger implications.

Résumé. L'article utilise les données de L'Étude électorale canadienne de 2004 pour identifier les principaux facteurs qui ont motivé l'appui aux différents partis et pour jauger leur impact sur le résultat de l'élection à l'extérieur du Québec. Les auteurs accordent une attention particulière aux effets du scandale des commandites, aux sources de l'appui au nouveau Parti conservateur et aux raisons sous-jacentes des gains du NPD. Les résultats permettent de répondre à un certain nombre de questions sur le sens et la portée de l'élection.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 1 - 25
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alford, Robert R. 1967. “Class Voting in the Anglo-American Political Systems.” In Party Systems and Voter Alignments, eds. Seymour Martin Lipset and Stein Rokkan. New York: Free Press.
Blais, André, Elisabeth Gidengil, Richard Nadeau and Neil Nevitte. 2001. “Measuring Party Identification: Canada, Britain, and the United States.” Political Behavior 23: 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André, Elisabeth Gidengil, Richard Nadeau and Neil Nevitte. 2002. Anatomy of a Liberal Victory: Making Sense of the 2000 Canadian Election. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
Blais, André, Mathieu Turgeon, Elisabeth Gidengil, Richard Nadeau and Neil Nevitte. 2004. “Which Matters Most? Comparing the Impact of Issues and the Economy in American, British, and Canadian Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 34: 555–63.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Jane Jenson, Lawrence LeDuc and Jon H. Pammett. 1991. Absent Mandate, 2nd ed. Toronto: Gage.
Clarke, Harold D. and Allan Kornberg. 1992. “Support for the Canadian Federal Progressive Conservative Party since 1988: The Impact of Economic Evaluations and Economic Issues.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 25: 29–53.Google Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth. 1992. “Canada Votes: A Quarter Century of Canadian National Election Studies.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 25: 219–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth. 2002. “The Class Voting Conundrum.” In Political Sociology, ed. Douglas Baer. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.
Gidengil, Elisabeth, André Blais, Joanna Everitt, Patrick Fournier and Neil Nevitte. 2005. “Missing the Message: Young Adults and the Election Issues.” Electoral Insight 7(1): 6–11.Google Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Matthew Hennigar, André Blais and Neil Nevitte. 2005. “Explaining the Gender Gap in Support for the New Right: The Case of Canada.” Comparative Political Studies 38: 1171–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Richard. 1992. “Party Identification Measures in the Anglo-American Democracies: A National Survey Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 36: 542–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDuc, Lawrence, Harold D. Clarke, Jane Jenson and Jon H. Pammett. 1984. “Partisan Instability in Canada: Evidence from a New Panel Study.” American Political Science Review 78: 470–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Martin Paldam. 2000. “Economic Voting: An Introduction.” Electoral Studies 19: 113–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, John. 1975. “Party Images in Canada: A Report on Work in Progress.” In John Meisel, Working Papers on Canadian Politics, second enlarged edition. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Miller, Warren E. and J. Merrill Shanks. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Nadeau, Richard and Michael Lewis-Beck. 2001. “National Economic Voting in US Presidential Elections.” Journal of Politics 63: 159–81.Google Scholar
Nevitte, Neil, André Blais, Elisabeth Gidengil and Richard Nadeau. 2000. Unsteady State. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.
Pammett, Jon H. 1987. “Class Voting and Class Consciousness in Canada.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 24: 269–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitten, Guy and Harvey Palmer. 1996. “Heightening Comparativists' Concern for Model Choice: Voting Behavior in Great Britain and the Netherlands.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 231–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. Matthew and Michael Lusztig. 2004. “The Spouse in the House: What Explains the Marriage Gap in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 37: 979–95.Google Scholar