Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:57:07.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Turnout Decline Matter? Electoral Turnout and Partisan Choice in the 1997 Canadian Federal Election*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2006

Michael D. Martinez  and
Jeff Gill
Michael D. Martinez*
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Jeff Gill*
Affiliation:
University of California-Davis
*
Michael D. Martinez, University of Florida, Department of Political Science, P.O. Box 117325, Gainesville, Florida 32611-7325 USA; martinez@ufl.edu
Jeff Gill, University of California-Davis, Department of Political Science, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616 USA; jgill@ucdavis.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The recent decline in electoral turnout in Canada has attracted the concern of scholars and public officials, but the partisan consequences of this decline have received only scant attention. We begin to address that question with a simulation based on the 1997 Canadian Election Study. Based on estimated probabilities of individual behaviour derived from multinomial logit models of voter choice, we find that higher turnout would have likely hurt the Liberal party in Quebec, but slightly helped the Liberals outside of Quebec. We interpret this pattern as evidence that generational politics plays a role in shaping the relationship between electoral turnout and partisan support.

Résumé

Résumé

Le déclin récent dans la participation électorale au Canada a attiré l'intérêt des chercheurs et des représentants de l'Etat, mais les conséquences partisanes de ce déclin n'ont sucité qu'une attention limitée. Nous commençons à aborder cette question à l'aide d'une simulation basée sur l'Etude électorale canadienne de 1997. En nous appuyant sur des probabilités estimatives du comportement individuel dérivées de modèles logistique multinominal du choix d'électeur, nous constatons qu'une participation plus importante aurait probablement nuit au Parti Libéral au Québec, mais aurait légèrement favorisé le Parti Libéral en dehors du Québec. Nous interprétons ce modèle comme preuve que la politique de générations contribue à la formation du rapport entre la participation électorale et l'appui partisan.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 2006 , pp. 343 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2003 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association (Philadelphia). We appreciate helpful comments from Ken Carty, Jan Leighley and this Journal's anonymous reviewers.

References

Bartels, Larry M. 1985. “Expectations and Preferences in Presidential Nominating Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 79: 804–815.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Panel Effects in the American National Election Studies.” Political Analysis 8: 1–20.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul and McPhee, William. 1954. Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bernhagen, Patrick and Marsh, Michael. 2004. “Turnout Matters: Sometimes.” Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions (Workshop 9), Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Robert, Chadha, Anita and Montjoy, Robert. 2001. “Overreporting Voting—Why It Happens and Why It Matters.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65: 22–44.Google Scholar
Blais, André and Dobrzynska, Agnieszka. 1998. “Turnout in Electoral Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 33: 239–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Nadeau, Richard and Nevitte, Neil. 2002. “Generational Change and the Decline of Political Participation: The Case of Voter Turnout in Canada.” Paper presented at Citizenship on Trial: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Socialization of Adolescents, Montreal.Google Scholar
Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Nevitte, Neil and Nadeau, Richard. 2004. “Where Does Turnout Decline Come From?” European Journal of Political Research 43: 221–236.Google Scholar
Burden, Barry C. 2000. “Voter Turnout and the National Election Studies.” Political Analysis 8: 389–398.Google Scholar
Cassel, Carol A. 2004. “Voting Records and Validated Voting Studies.” Public Opinion Quarterly 68: 102–108.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack, Schickler, Eric and Sides, John. 2003. “What If Everyone Voted? Simulating the Impact of Increased Turnout in Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 47: 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNardo, James. 1980. “Turnout and the Vote: The Joke's on the Democrats.” American Political Science Review 74: 406–420.Google Scholar
Elections Canada. 1997. Thirty-sixth General Election 1997: Official Voting Results. http://www.elections.ca (July 18, 2003).Google Scholar
Elections Canada. 2003. Voter Turnout at Federal Elections and Referendums 1867–2000. http://www.elections.ca (July 27, 2003).Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark N. 1996. “Electoral Participation.” In Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, eds. LeDuc, Lawrence, Niemi, Richard G. and Norris, Pippa. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gray, Mark and Caul, Miki. 2000. “Declining Voter Turnout in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950 to 1997—The Effects of Declining Group Mobilization.” Comparative Political Studies 33: 1091–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, Jerry and McFadden, Daniel. 1984. “Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model.” Econometrica 52: 1219–1240.Google Scholar
Hicks, Alexander M. and Swank, Duane H.. 1992. “Politics, Institutions, and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960–82.” American Political Science Review 86: 658–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Kim Quaile and Leighley, Jan E.. 1992. “The Policy Consequences of Class Bias in State Electorates.” American Journal of Political Science 36: 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karklins, Rasma. 1986. “Soviet Elections Revisited: Abstention in Noncompetitive Voting.” American Political Science Review 80: 449–469.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne and Scheve, Kenneth. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review 95: 49–69.Google Scholar
LeDuc, Lawrence and Pammett, Jon H.. 2003. “Elections and Participation: the Meanings of Turnout Decline.” Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Political Science Association, Halifax.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma.” American Political Science Review 91: 1–14.Google Scholar
Little, Roderick J. A. and Rubin, Donald B.. 1983. “On Jointly Estimating Parameters and Missing Data by Maximizing the Complete-Data Likelihood.” The American Statistician 37: 218–220.Google Scholar
Lyons, William and Alexander, Robert. 2000. “A Tale of Two Electorates: Generational Replacement and The Decline of Voting in Presidential Elections.” Journal of Politics 62: 1014–1034.Google Scholar
Martinez, Michael D. 1997. “Don't Tax You, Don't Tax Me, Tax the Fella Behind the Tree: Partisan and Turnout Effects on Tax Policy.” Social Science Quarterly 78: 895–906.Google Scholar
Martinez, Michael D. 2000. “Turning Out or Tuning Out? Electoral Participation in Canada and the United States.” In Canada and the United States: Differences That Count, ed. Thomas, David. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Martinez, Michael D. 2003. “Comment on ‘Voter Turnout and the National Election Studies’.” Political Analysis 11: 187–192.Google Scholar
Martinez, Michael D. and Gill, Jeff. 2005. “The Effects of Turnout on Partisan Outcomes in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1960–2000.” Journal of Politics 67: 1248–1274.Google Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. and Palda, Filip. 1999. “Voter Turnout: How Much Can We Explain?” Public Choice 98: 431–446.Google Scholar
McDonald, Michael P. and Popkin, Samuel L.. 2001. “The Myth of the Vanishing Voter.” American Political Science Review 95: 963–974.Google Scholar
Milner, Henry. 1997. “Electoral Systems, Integrated Institutions and Turnout in Local and National Elections: Canada in Comparative Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 30: 89–106.Google Scholar
Milner, Henry. 2004. “Political Dropouts and Electoral System Reform.” In Steps Toward Making Every Vote Count: Electoral System Reform in Canada and its Provinces, ed. Milner, Henry. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, Dennis C. and Stratmann, Thomas. 2003. “The Economic Effects of Democratic Participation.” Journal of Public Economics 87: 2129–2155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Jack H. and McNulty, John E.. 1996. “Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout in Senatorial and Gubernatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review 90: 780–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevitte, Neil, Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth and Nadeau, Richard. 2000. Unsteady State: the 1997 Canadian Federal Election. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nevitte, Neil, Johnston, Richard, Blais, André, Brady, Henry and Gidengil, Elisabeth. 1995. “Electoral Discontinuity in the 1993 Canadian Federal Election.” International Social Science Journal 47: 583–599.Google Scholar
Pacek, Alexander C. and Radcliff, Benjamin. 1995. “Turnout and the Vote for Left-of-Center Parties—A Cross-National Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 25: 137–143.Google Scholar
Pammett, Jon H. and LeDuc, Lawrence. 2003. Explaining the Turnout Decline in Canadian Federal Elections: A New Survey of Non-Voters. Ottawa: Elections Canada.Google Scholar
Radcliff, Benjamin. 1994. “Turnout and the Democratic Vote.” American Politics Quarterly 22: 259–276.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Tóka, Gabor. 2000. “Turnout and Information Effects on Election Outcomes.” Paper presented at the Conference on Political Participation: Building a Research Agenda, Center for the Study of Democratic Politics, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Tucker, Harvey J. and Vedlitz, Arnold. 1986. “Controversy: Does Heavy Turnout Help Democrats in Presidential Elections?” American Political Science Review 80: 1291–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Buuren, Stef and Oudshoorn, Karin. 1999. Flexible Multivariate Imputation by MICE. Leiden: TNO Preventie en Gezondheid.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar