No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2009
1 For another example, see “Mr. Meisel Stands on Guard: Nationalism and the Academic Elite,” Canadian Forum (November-December 1974). See also Cairns, Alan, “Alternative Styles in the Study of Canadian Politics,” this Journal (March 1974), 101.Google Scholar
2 Elites in the Policy Process (New York and London: Cambridge University Press 1974), 336–9, 423–6
3 Particular difficulty seems to have occurred because I analysed group behaviour in two different contexts, i.e. general, run-of-the-mill experience and a specific “case issue.” Substantial variation occurred in the two contexts, largely because the “case” involved matters of special salience to the groups concerned. Since this procedure hardly seems recondite and the relevant tables were typically labelled as either “case study issue” or “general,” Simeon's reaction again seems to reflect nationalistic nit-picking.
4 “Consensus and Ideology in American Politics,” American Political Science Review, 58 (June 1964), 373–4
1 Poel, Dale, Review of Presthus, The Dalhousie Review, LIV (Winter 1974), 794–9Google Scholar