Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:02:18.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Empire's Law: Alexis de Tocqueville on Colonialism and the State of Exception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2008

Margaret Kohn
Margaret Kohn*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
*
Margaret Kohn, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, 100 St. George St., Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 3G3, kohn@utsc.utoronto.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. In recent years there has been a debate about how to evaluate Alexis de Tocqueville's defense of colonialism. Some scholars have argued that there is a tension between the key doctrines of Tocqueville's political theory and his enthusiastic promotion of the French conquest and colonization of Algeria. Others have concluded that the apparent contradiction can be explained by paying careful attention to the nuances of his work or the logic of liberalism. This article advances this debate by reconstructing Tocqueville's theory of martial law, a dimension of his work that has been frequently overlooked. In a series of letters, notes and parliamentary reports on Algeria, Tocqueville criticized of the use of martial law in governing French citizens and defended its use against native Algerians. Tocqueville's writings on Algeria make it clear that he treated the rule of law not as a natural right held by all people but rather as a technique of government that was appropriate in communities already united by social ties.

Résumé. Récemment, l'interprétation de la défense du colonialisme par Alexis de Tocqueville est devenue l'objet d'un débat important. Certains auteurs discernent une tension entre les principes centraux de la philosophie politique de Tocqueville et sa promotion enthousiaste de la conquête et la colonisation de l'Algérie par la France. D'autres ont conclu que la contradiction apparente s'explique lorsqu'on regarde de près les nuances de ses écrits sur la logique interne du libéralisme. Cet article contribue à ce débat en reconstruisant la théorie de la loi martiale de Tocqueville – une dimension de son oeuvre trop souvent négligée. Dans une série de lettres, notes et rapports parlementaires sur l'Algérie, Tocqueville a critiqué l'usage de la loi martiale dans le gouvernement des citoyens français, mais l'a défendu contre les indigènes. Ses écrits sur l'Algérie démontrent que Tocqueville considérait l'État de droit non comme un droit naturel inhérent à la personne, mais plutôt comme une technique de gouvernement s'appliquant principalement aux communautés déjà unies par des liens sociaux.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 255 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. State of Exception. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Beloff, Max. 1986. “Tocqueville & Gobineau: On Race, Revolution and Despair.” Encounter 67(1): 29–31.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1965. “The Thought of de Tocqueville.” History 50: 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesche, Roger. 1987. The Strange Liberalism of Alexis de Tocqueville. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesche, Roger. 2005. “The Dark Side of Tocqueville: On War and Empire.” Review of Politics 67 (4): 737–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohlender, Matthias. 2005. “Demokratie and Imperium. Tocqueville in Amerika und Algerien.” Berliner Journal fur Soziologie 4: 523–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, Gladys. 1945. Man and Society: The Scottish Inquiry of the Eighteenth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dion, Stephane. 1990. “Durham et Tocqueville sur la colonisation liberale.” Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d'Études Canadiennes 25(1): 60–77.Google Scholar
Eze, Emmanuel. 1997. Post-colonial African Philosophy: A Critical Reader. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fanon, Franz. 1963. The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Fatovic, Clement. 2006. “Emergency Action as Jurisprudential Miracle.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Meeting.Google Scholar
Hussein, Nasser. 2003. The Jurisprudence of Emergency: Colonialism and the Rule of Law. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Ellen. 2004. Constitutional Failure: Carl Schmitt in Weimar. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kohn, Margaret and O'Neill, Daniel. 2006. “A Tale of Two Indias: Burke and Mill and Empire and Slavery in the West Indies and Americas.” Political Theory 34: 192–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostal, Rande. 2000. “A Jurisprudence of Power: Martial Law and the Ceylon Controversy of 1848–51.” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 28(1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostal, Rande. 2006. A Jurisprudence of Power: Victorian Empire and the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lawlor, Mary. 1959. Alexis de Tocqueville in the Chamber of Deputies: His View on Foreign and Colonial Policy. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Le Cour Grandmaison, Olivier. 2001. “Quand Tocqueville légitimait les boucheries.” Le Monde diplomatique.Google Scholar
Lively, Jack. 1962. The Social and Political Thought of Alexis de Tocqueville. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Meek, Ronald. 1976. Social Science and the Ignoble Savage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mehta, Uday. 1999. Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1963. Collected Works. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Muthu, Sanker. 2003. Enlightenment Against Empire. Princeton: Princeton Unviersity Press.Google Scholar
Petit, Philip. 2000. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. 2000. “Empire and Democracy: Tocqueville and the Algeria Question.” Journal of Political Philosophy 8(3): 295–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. 2001. “Introduction.” Writings on Empire and Slavery: Alexis de Tocqueville. trans. and ed. Pitts, Jennifer. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. 2005. A Turn towards Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, Mark. 1997. The Art of Being Free: Taking Liberties with Tocqueville, Marx, and Arendt. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. 1963. “Tocqueville on Algeria.” Review of Politics 25(3): 362–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheuerman, William. 1997. Between Norm and Exception: The Frankfurt School and the Rule of Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, William. 2006. “Emergency Powers and the Rule of Law After 9/11.” Journal of Political Philosophy 14(1): 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneck, Stephen. 1992. “New Reading's of Tocqueville's America: Lessons for Democracy.” Polity 25: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1962. Écrits et discours politiques. Ouevres Complètes. Vol. III. ed. Jardin, André. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1985. Selected Letters on Politics and Society. ed. Boesche, and trans. Roger. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2000. Democracy in America. ed. Mayer, J.P., Lawrence, trans. George. New York: Perennial Classics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2001. Writings on Empire and Slavery. ed. and trans. Pitts, Jennifer. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. 1988. De la colonie en Algérie. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Viroli, Maurizio and Shugaar, Anthony. 2001. Republicanism. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Welch, Cheryl. 2003. “Colonial Violence and the Rhetoric of Evasion: Tocqueville on Algeria.” Political Theory 31(2): 235–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. 2001. Tocqueville Between Two Worlds. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar