Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:51:46.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Following the Right: Left and Right Parties’ Influence over Multiculturalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2020

Daniel Westlake*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Studies, Queen's University, Room C321, Mackintosh-Corry Hall, 68 University Ave., Kingston, ONK7L 3N6

Abstract

Debates over multiculturalism are increasingly partisan. The rise of the far right is forcing centre-right parties into difficult decisions over how to hold on to nationalist voters while appealing to moderates. Left parties face similar dilemmas when balancing the pressures of pro-multicultural voters against those opposed to immigration. What do these debates mean for the future of multiculturalism? Using a new, annualized version of the Multiculturalism Policy Index, this article argues that partisan consensus is important to the development of multiculturalism. It demonstrates that support from centre-right parties plays a key role in the adoption of multiculturalism policies.

Résumé

Résumé

Les débats sur le multiculturalisme sont de plus en plus partisans. La montée de l'extrême droite oblige les partis de centre-droit à prendre des décisions difficiles sur la manière de fidéliser les électeurs nationalistes tout en faisant appel aux modérés. Les partis de gauche font face à des dilemmes similaires lorsqu'ils doivent concilier les pressions des électeurs favorables au multiculturalisme et celles des opposants à l'immigration. Que signifient ces débats pour l'avenir du multiculturalisme ? À l'aide d'une nouvelle version annualisée du Multiculturalism Policy Index, le présent article soutient que le consensus partisan est important pour le développement du multiculturalisme. Il démontre que l'appui des partis de centre-droit joue un rôle clé dans le processus de l'adoption de politiques en matière de multiculturalisme.

Type
Research Article/Étude originale
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abou-Chadi, Tarik. 2016. “Political and institutional determinants of immigration policies.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (13): 20872110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araki, Hiroshi. 2000. “Ideas and Welfare: The Conservative Transformation of the British Pension Regime.” Journal of Social Policy 29 (4): 599621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bale, Tim. 2014. “Putting It Right? The Labour Party's Big Shift on Immigration since 2010.” Political Quarterly 85 (3): 296303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banting, Keith and Kymlicka, Will. 2013. “Is there Really a Retreat from Multiculturalism Policies? New Evidence from the Multiculturalism Policy Index.” Comparative European Politics 5 (11): 577598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1998. “Where the Ducks Are: Voting Power in a Party System.” In Politicians and Party Politics, ed. Geer, John G.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D.. 2009. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bird, Karen, Tiberj, Vincent, Saalfeld, Thomas, Michon, Laure, Tillie, Jean, Jacobs, Dirk, Delwit, Pascal, Tahvilzadeh, Nazem, Bergh, Johannes, Bjørklund, Tor, Mikkelsen, Flemming, Wüst, Andreas M., Jenny, Marcelo and Pérez-Nievas, Santiago. 2011. “Party Choices in Comparative Perspective.” In The Political Representation of Immigrants and Minorities: Voters, Parties and Parliaments in Liberal Democracies, ed. Bird, Karen, Saalfeld, Thomas and Wüst, Andreas M.. Routledge/ECPR: New York.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2001. “The Return of Assimilation? Changing Perspectives on Immigration and Its Sequels in France, Germany, and the United States.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 24 (4): 531–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruenig, Christian and Luedtke, Adam. 2008. “What Motivates the Gatekeepers? Explaining Government Party Preferences on Immigration.” Governance 21 (1): 123–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carens, Joseph H. 2000. Culture, Citizenship, and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, Christopher. 2011. “The Asymmetrical Structure of Left/Right Disagreement: Left-Wing Coherence and Right-Wing Fragmentation in Comparative Party Policy.” Party Politics 19 (1): 104–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Rafaela M. 2010. Immigration and Conflict in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Rafeala M. and Saunders, Elizabeth N.. 2016. “A New Electorate? Comparing Preferences and Partisanship between Immigrants and Natives.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 962–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duyvendak, Jan Willem, van Reekum, Rogier, El-Hajjari, Fatiha and Bertossi, Christophe. 2013. “Mysterious Multiculturalism: The Risks of Using Model-Based Indices for Making Meaningful Comparisons.” Comparative European Politics 11 (5): 599620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favell, Adrian. 1998. Philosophies of Integration: Immigration and the Idea of Citizenship in France and Britain. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Fleras, Augie and Elliot, Jean H.. 2002. Engaging Diversity: Multiculturalism in Canada. Toronto: Nelson Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Freeman, Gary P. 2002. “Winners and Losers: Politics and the Costs and Benefits of Migration.” In West European Immigration and Immigrant Policy in the New Century, ed. Messina, Anthony M.. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givens, Terri and Luedtke, Adam. 2005. “European Immigration Policies in Comparative Perspective: Issue Salience, Partisanship, and Immigrant Rights.” Comparative European Politics 3 (1): 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Sara Wallace. 2010. “Integration Requirements for Integration's Sake? Identifying, Categorising, and Comparing Civic Integration Policies.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36 (5): 753–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Sara Wallace. 2014. Immigration and Membership Politics in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green-Pedersen, Christoffer and Krogstrup, Jesper. 2008. “Immigration as a Political Issue in Denmark and Sweden.” European Journal of Political Research 47 (5): 610–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudbrandsen, Føy. 2010. “Partisan Influence on Immigration: The Case of Norway.” Scandinavian Political Studies 33 (3): 248–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. and Pierson, Paul. 2010. Winner Take All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer—and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hinnfors, Jonas, Spehar, Andrea and Bucken-Knapp, Gregg. 2012. “The Missing Factor: Why Social Democracy Can Lead to Restrictive Immigration Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 19 (4): 585603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Marc Morjé. 2009. The Politics of Citizenship in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Ramesh, M.. 2003. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ireland, Patrick. 2004. Becoming Europe: Immigration, Integration, and the Welfare State. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janoski, Thomas. 2010. The Ironies of Citizenship Naturalization and Integration in Industrialized Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2017. Is Multiculturalism Dead? Crisis and Persistence in the Constitutional State. Cambridge: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed.New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud, Michalowski, Ines and Waibel, Stine. 2012. “Citizenship Rights for Immigrants: National Political Processes and Cross-National Convergence in Western Europe, 1980–2008.” American Journal of Sociology 117 (4): 1202–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koopmans, Ruud, Statham, Paul, Giugni, Marco and Passy, Florence. 2005. Contested Citizenship. Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Lachat, Romain, Dolezal, Martin, Bornschier, Simon and Frey, Timotheos. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krouwel, André. 2012. Party Transformations in European Democracies. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lahav, Gallya. 2004. “Public Opinion toward Immigration in the European Union: Does It Matter?Comparative Political Studies 37 (10): 1151–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighley, Jan E. 2001. Strength in Numbers? The Political Mobilization of Racial and Ethnic Minorities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lopez, Mark. 2000. The Origins of Multiculturalism in Australian Politics 1945–1975. Victoria: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Odmalm, Pontus. 2012. “Party Competition and Positions on Immigration: Strategic Advantages and Spacial Locations.” Comparative European Politics 10 (1): 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu C. 2006. Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, Ted. 1996. “Bringing Parties Back In: Comments on Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic Societies.” International Migration Review 30 (1): 375–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siu, Bobby. 2014. Developing Public Policy: A Practical Guide. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1994. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, ed. Taylor, Charles and Gutmann, Amy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, N. M. 2005. “On Headscarves and Heterogeneity: Reflections on the French Foulard Affair.” Dialectical Anthropology 29: 373–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, Erin. 2011. “Multiculturalism Policy Index: Immigrant and Minority Policies.” Kingston: Queen's School of Policy Studies. https://www.queensu.ca/mcp/sites/webpublish.queensu.ca.mcpwww/files/files/immigrantminorities/evidence/ImmigrantMinoritiesApr12.pdf (November 20, 2015).Google Scholar
Triadafilopoulos, Triadafilos and Zaslove, Andrej. 2006. “Influencing Migration Policy From Inside: Political Parties.” In Dialogues on Migration Policy, ed. Giugni, Marco and Passy, Florence. Oxford: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Van der Brug, Wouter and van Spanje, Joost. 2009. “Immigration, Europe, and the ‘New’ Cultural Dimension.” European Journal of Political Research 48 (3): 309–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westlake, Daniel. 2017. “MCP for Immigrant Minorities: Annual Data 1960–2011.” Multiculturalism Policies in Contemporary Democracies. http://www.queensu.ca/mcp/annual_data. (November 15, 2017)Google Scholar
Wright, Matthew and Bloemraad, Irene. 2012. “Is There a Trade-Off between Multiculturalism and Socio-Political Integration? Policy Regimes and Immigrant Incorporation in Comparative Perspective.” Perspectives on Politics 10: 7795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Westlake supplementary material

Westlake supplementary material 1

Download Westlake supplementary material(File)
File 13.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Westlake supplementary material

Westlake supplementary material 2

Download Westlake supplementary material(File)
File 294.9 KB