Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2009
This article re-examines the main propositions which underlie Public Choice argumentation in respect to the growth of the state and evaluates their plausibility in light of current knowledge. The majority of the hypotheses are confirmed, at least partially. Their principal contribution is at the level of strategies which can be attributed to political and bureaucratic personnel, although the influence of the latter appears to be exaggerated.
The Public Choice explanations remain very partial. Taking state intervention as a theme, Public Choice shows well how once an activity is begun, it has a tendency to expand. However, Public Choice says nothing of the social dynamics responsible for the fact that the state has been induced to intervene from the start. Intervention has had as its first function the quelling of social conflicts. The argumentation of Public Choice can explain only the recent growth of the state at the end of the 1960s and beginning of the 1970s. The new trend of putting a ceiling on government expenditures rests largely unexplained. These gaps are not inherent in the model and can be corrected. When the Public Choice authors adopt a more historical perspective, which brings about a relative treatment of the phenomenon, they will be able to propose more convincing interpretations.
1 Borcherding, Thomas A. « The Sources of Growth of Public Expenditures in the United States, 1902Google Scholar-1910 », dans Borcherding, Thomas A. (dir.), Budgets and Bureaucrats: the Sources of Government Growth (Durham: Duke University Press, 1977);Google ScholarPeacock, Alan J. et Wiseman, Jack, The Growth of Public Expenditures in the United Kingdom (London: Allen & Unwin, 1967);Google ScholarBird, Richard M.The Growth of Government Spending in Canada (Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 1970);Google ScholarAndre, Christine et Delorme, Robert, « The Long Run Growth of Public Expenditures in France », Public Finance 33 (1978), 42–63;Google Scholar et Fontvieille, Louis, « Evolution et croissance de l'Etat français: 1915-1969 », Economies et Societes, tome X, nos. 9-10-11-12 (septembre-decembre 1976).Google Scholar
2 Tarshys, Daniel, ,The Growth of Public Expenditures: Nine Modes of Explanation », Scandinavian Political Studies 10 (1975), 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Ibid., 29.
4 Larkey, Patrick D.Chandler Stolpet Mark Winer,« Theorizing About the Growth of Government: A Research Assessment », Journal of Public Policy 1 (1981), 157–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Blais, Andre, « Orientation de la recherche », dans Rejan Landry (dir.), Introduction a I'analyse des politiques (Quebec: Presses de L'Université Laval, 1980).Google Scholar
6 Mueller, Dennis C., Public Choice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
7 Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper, 1957).Google Scholar
8 Mueller, Public Choice, 153.Google Scholar
9 Migue, Jean-Luc, L'economiste et la chose publique (Sillery: Presses de l'Université du Québec, 1979), 212.Google Scholar
10 Niskanen, William A.Bureaucracy and Representative Government (Chicago: Aldine, 1971).Google Scholar
11 Mueller, Public Choice, 56.Google Scholar
12 Buchanan, James M. et Flowers, Marilyn R., The Public Finances: An Introductory Textbook (Homewood: lrwin, 1975), 146.Google Scholar
13 Ibid., 147.
14 Lepage, Henri, Demain le capitalisme (Paris: Librairie générale franáaise, 1978), 211.Google Scholar
15 Buchanan, James M., « Why Does Government Grow? » dans Borcherding, Thomas E. (dir.), Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth (Durham: Duke University Press, 1977), 11.Google Scholar
16 Lepage, Demain le capitalisme, 204–05.Google Scholar
17 Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy.
18 Stigler, George J., « Director's Law of Public Income Redistribution », Journal of Law and Economics 13 (1970), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Sam, Peltzman, « The Growth of Government », Journal of Law and Economics 23 (1980), 209–89.Google Scholar
20 Meltzer, Allan H. et Richard, Scott F., « A Rational Theory of the Size of Government », Journal of Political Economy 89 (1981), 914–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 Belanger, Gerard, L'economique du secteur public (Chicoutimi: Gaetan Morin, 1981), chap. 2.Google Scholar
22 Spann, Robert M., « Public versus Private Provision of Governmental Services », dans Borcherding (dir.), Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth.Google Scholar
23 Ibid., 84.
24 Caves, Douglas W. et Christensen, Laurits R., « The Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Firms in a Competitive Environment: The Case of Canadian Railroads », Journal of Political Economy 88 (1980), 958–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Buchanan, « Why Does Government Grow? », 9.Google Scholar
26 Borcherding, Thomas E., « The Sources of Growth of Public Expenditures in the United States, 1902-1970 », dans Borcherding (dir.), Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth, 61.Google Scholar
27 Beck, Morris, « Public Sector Growth: A Real Perspective », Public Finance 34 (1979), 313–55.Google Scholar
28 Rose, Richard, « On the Priorities of Government: A Developmental Analysis of Public Choice », European Journal of Political Research 3 (1976), 247–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29 Staaf, Robert J., « The Public School System in Transition: Consolidation and Parental Choice », dans Borcherding (dir.), Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth.Google Scholar
30 Parkinson, C. Northcote, Parkinson's Law and Other Studies in Administration, (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1962).Google Scholar
31 Breton, Albert et Wintrobe, Ronald, « Bureaucracy and State Intervention: Parkinson's Law? » Administration publique du Canada 22 (1979), 208–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Wildavsky, Aaron, The Politics of the Budgetary Process (Boston: Little Brown, 1964).Google Scholar
33 Peters, B. Guy, The Politics of Bureaucracy: A Comparative Perspective (New York: Longmann, 1978).Google Scholar
34 Matthews, Donald R., United States Senators and Their World (New York: Vintage Brooks, 1960).Google Scholar
35 Mayhew, David R., Congress: The Electoral Connection (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
36 Munroe, Ronald,« The Member of Parliament as Representative: The View from the Constituency », Political Studies 25 (1977), 577–88.Google Scholar
37 Braud, Philippe, Le suffrage universel contre la de'mocratie (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1980), 216.Google Scholar
38 Matthews, United Slates Senators and Their World, 75; Kornberg, Alan, Canadian Legislative Behavior (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1967);Google ScholarBraud, Philippe, Le suffrage universel contre la démocratie, 203.Google Scholar
39 Erickson, Robert S., « Is There Such a Thing as a Safe Seat? », Polity 8 (1976), 623–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40 Frey, Bruno S., « Politico-Economic Models and Cycles », Journal of Public Economics 9 (1978), 203–20;CrossRefGoogle ScholarTufte, Edward R., Political Control of the Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978);Google ScholarAmes, Barry, « The Politics of Public Spending in Latin America », American Journal of Political Science 21 (1977), 149–77;CrossRefGoogle Scholar et Blais, André, « Politique agricole et résultats électoraux en milieu agricole au Québec», cette REVUE 11 (1978), 333–82.Google Scholar
41 Paldam, Martin, « An Essay on the Rationality of Economic Policy: The Test-Case of the Electional Cycle », Public Choice 37 (1981), 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42 Frey, « Politico-Economic Models and Cycles ».
43 Ackerman, R. S., The Economics of Corruption: An Essay in Political Economy (New York: Academic Press, 1977).Google Scholar
44 Peters, John G. et Welch, Susan, « The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections », American Political Science Review 74 (1980), 697–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45 Migué, L'économiste.
46 Ferejohn, John A., « On the Decline of Competition in Congressional Elections », American Political Science Review 71 (1977), 166–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47 Cover, Albert D., « One Good Term Deserves Another: The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections », American Journal of Political Science 3 (1977), 523–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48 Parker, Glenn R., « Sources of Change in Congressional District Attentiveness », American Journal of Political Science 24 (1980), 115–25;CrossRefGoogle ScholarYianakis, Dianne Evans, « Casework and Congressional Elections », American Journal of Political Science 25 (1981), 568–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49 Anton, Thomas, « Roles and Symbols in the Determination of State Expenditures », dans Ira Sharkansky (dir.), Policy Analysis in Political Science (Chicago: Markham, 1970).Google Scholar
50 Highley, John, Brofoss, Karl Erik et Groholt, Knut, « Top Civil Servants and the National Budget in Norway », dans Mattei Dogan (dir.), The Mandarins of Western Europe (New York: Wiley, 1975).Google Scholar
51 Borcherding, Thomas E., Bush, Winston C. et Spann, Robert M., « The Effects on Public Spending of the Divisibility of Public Outputs in Consumption, Bureaucratic Power, and the Size of the Tax-Sharing Group », dans Borcherding (dir.), Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth.Google Scholar
52 Peters, B. Guy et Klingman, David, « Patterns of Expenditure Development in Sweden, Norway and Denmark », British Journal of Political Science 7 (1977), 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53 Pommerehne, Werner M. et Schneider, Frederick, « Fiscal Illusion, Political Institutions and Local Public Spending », Kyklos 31 (1978), 381–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54 Green, Kenneth V. et Munley, Vincent, « Generating Growth in Public Expenditures: The Role of Employee and Constituent Demand », Public Finance Quarterly 7 (1979), 92–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55 Frey, « Politico-Economic Models and Cycles », 203-20; Castles, Francis G. et McKinlay, R. D., « Public Welfare Provision, Scandinavia, and the Sheer Futility of the Sociological Approach to Politics », British Journal of Political Science 9 (1979), 157–73;CrossRefGoogle ScholarTufte, Edward R., Political Control of the EconomyGoogle Scholar, Wilensky, Harold L., « Leftism, Catholicism and Democratic Corporatism: The Role of Political Parties in Recent Welfare State Development », dans Flora, Peter et Heidenheimer, Arnold J. (dir.), The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America (New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1981).Google Scholar
56 Ardant, Gabriel, « Financial Policy and Economic Infrastructure of Modern States and Nations », dans Charles Tilly (dir.), The Formation of National States in Western Europe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
57 Buchanan, « Why Does Government Grow? », II.
58 Schmölders, G., Psychologie desfinances et de l'impöt (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1973), 83.Google Scholar
59 Ibid., 40 sq.
60 Seldon, Arthur, Taxation and Welfare. A Report on Private Opinion and Public Policy (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1967), 23.Google Scholar
61 Norbert Lloyd Enrick, « A Pilot Study of Income Tax Consciousness », National Tax Journal 16 (1963), 170.Google Scholar
62 Williamson, J. B., « Beliefs about the Rich, the Poor and the Taxes They Pay », American Journal of Economics and Sociology 35 (1976), 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63 Auld, D. A. L., « Public Sector Awareness and Preferences in Ontario », Canadian Tax Journal 27 (1979), 172–84.Google Scholar
64 Schmölders, Psychologie des finances et de l'impôt, 90.
65 Auld, « Public Sector Awareness and Preferences in Ontario »; Gensemer, Bruce L., Lean, Jane A. et Neenan, William B., « Awareness of Marginal Income Tax Rates Among High Income Taxpayers », National Tax Journal 18 (1965), 268–76;Google Scholar Schmolders, Psychologie des finances el de l'impot; et Seldon, Taxation and Welfare. A Report on Private Opinion and Public Policy.
66 Irwin Gillespie, W, The Incidence of Taxes and Public Expenditures in the Canadian Economy (Ottawa: Studies of the Royal Commission on Taxation, 1966);Google ScholarFoulon et, A al., « A Preliminary Assessment of the Redistribution of Public Funds in France in 1975 », Luigi Solan, dans et Pasquier, J. N. du (dir.), Private and Enlarged Consumption (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1976);Google ScholarFranzen, Thomas, Lougren, Kerstin et Rosenberg, Irma, « Redistributional Effects of Taxes and Public Expenditures in Sweden », Sweden Journal of Economics 11 (1975), 31–55;CrossRefGoogle ScholarO'Higgins, Michael et Ruggles, Patricia, « The Distribution of Public Expenditure and Taxes Among Households in the United Kingdom », Review of Income and Wealth 27 (1981), 298–327;CrossRefGoogle Scholar et Musgrave, P. et Musgrave, R., Public Finance in Theory and Practice (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976).Google Scholar
67 Peters, B. Guy, « Determinants of Tax Policy », Policy Studies Journal 7 (1979), 787–91;CrossRefGoogle Scholar et Cameron, David R., « The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis », American Political Science Review 72 (1978), 1243–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
68 Wilensky, « Leftism, Catholicism and Democratic Corporatism: The Role of Political Parties in Recent Welfare State Development ».
69 Pommerehne et Schneider, « Fiscal Illusion Political Institutions and Local Public Spending ».
70 Wagner, Richard F., « Revenue Structure, Fiscal Illusion and Budgetary Choice », Public Choice 25 (1976), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
71 Munley, Vincent G. et Green, Kenneth V., « Fiscal Illusion, the Nature of Public Goods and Equation Specification », Public Choice 33 (1978), 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72 Olson, Mancur, The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
73 Carll Ladd, Everett Jr. et al., « The Polls: Taxing and Spending », Public Opinion Quarterly 43 (1979), 126–36;CrossRefGoogle Scholar et Citrin, Jack, « Do People Want Something for Nothing: Public Opinion on Taxes and Government Spending », National Tax Journal 32, (1979), 113–31.Google Scholar
74 Ward, Benjamin, « Taxes and the Size of Government », American Economic Review 72 (1982), 346–51.Google Scholar
75 Miskanen, William A., « Economic and Fiscal Effects on the Popular Vote for the President », dans, Douglas W. Rae et Eismeier, Theodore J.(dir-), Public Policy and Public Choice (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979).Google Scholar
76 Pomper, Gerald M., Elections in America (New York: Dodd, 1968).Google Scholar
77 Frey, Bruno S., « The Political Business Cycle: Theory and Evidence », dans W. M. Buchanan, et al, The Economics of Politics (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1978).Google Scholar
78 Kau, James B. et Rubin, Paul H., « The Size of Government », Public Choice 37 (1981), 261–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
79 O.C.D.E., Statistiques des recettes publiques des pays membres de I'OCDE, 1965-1980.Google Scholar
80 Cameron, « The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis ».
81 O.C.D.E., Statistiques des recettes publiques des pays membres de I'OCDE, 1965-1980.
82 Eismeier, Theodore J., « Budgets and Ballots: The Political Consequences of Fiscal Choice », dans Rae et Eismeier (dir.), Public Policy and Public Choice.Google Scholar
83 Terrebonne, R. Peter, « Government as a Super Becker Altruist », Public Choice 37 (1981), 595–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
84 Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy.
85 Stigler, « Director's Law of Public Income Redistribution ».
86 Tullock, Gordon, « The Charity of the Uncharitable », Western Economic Journal 9 (1971), 379–92.Google Scholar
87 Pommerehne, Werner W., « Public Choice Approaches to Explain Fiscal Redistribution », dans Karl W. Roskamp(dir-), Choixpublics elfinancespubliques, (Paris: Cujas, 1980).Google Scholar
88 Romer, Thomas et Rosenthal, Howard, « The Elusive Median Voter », Journal of Public Economics 12 (1979), 143–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
89 Meltzer et Richard, « A Rational Theory of the Size of Government ».
90 Peltzman, « The Growth of Government ».
91 Flora, Peter et Heidenheimer, Arnold J., « The Historical Core and Changing Boundaries of the Welfare State », dans Flora et Heidenheimer (dir.), The Development of Welfare Slates in Europe and America.Google Scholar
92 Rimlinger, Gaston V., Welfare Policy and Industrialization in Europe, America and Russia (New York: Wiley, 1971), 111.Google Scholar
93 Ibid., 19 et 130.
94 Vatter, Harold C., « Perspectives on the Forty-Sixth Anniversary of the U.S. Mixed Economy », Explorations in Economic History 16 (1979), 297–331;CrossRefGoogle Scholar et Skorpol, Thida, « Political Response to Capitalist Crisis: Neo-Marxist Theories of the State and the Case of the New Deal », Politics and Society 10 (1980), 155–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
95 Finkel, Alvin, « Origins of the Welfare State in Canada », dans Leo Panitch (dir.), The Canadian State: Political Economy and Political Power (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977), 360.Google Scholar
96 Wilenski, Harold L., The Welfare State and Equality (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978).Google Scholar
97 Cameron, « The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis ».Google Scholar
98 Castles et McKinlay, « Public Welfare Provision, Scandinavia, and the Sheer Futility of the Sociological Approach to Politics ».
99 Castles, Francis G., « How Does Politics Matter? Structure or Agency in the Determination of Public Policy Outcomes », European Journal of Political Research 9 (1981), 119–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
100 Chandler, William M., Canadian Socialism and Policy Impact: Contagion from the Left?, cette REVUE 10 (1977), 755–80.Google Scholar
101 Wolfelsperger, Alain, « Croissance économique, conflits sociaux et dépenses publiques: une interpretation de la croissance de l'Etat dans les sociétés contemporaines », Vie et sciences économiques 77 (1978), 42–54.Google Scholar
102 Goldthorpe, John H., « The Current Inflation: Toward a Sociological Account », dans Fred Hirsch et John H. Goldthorpe (dir.), The Political Economy of Inflation (London: Martin Robertson, 1978);Google Scholar et Bell, Daniel, The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism (New York: Basic Books, 1976).Google Scholar
103 Peltzman, « The Growth of Government ».
104 Rose, « On the Priorities of Government: A Developmental Analysis of Public Choice ».
105 Rosanvallon, Pierre, La arise de l'Etat-providence (Paris: Seuil, 1981), 38.Google Scholar
106 Peters et Klingman, « Patterns of Expenditure Development in Sweden, Norway and Denmark ».
107 O.C.D.E., Statistiques des recettes publiques des pays membres de I'OCDE, 1965-1980.Google Scholar
108 Peltzman, « The Growth of Government »; et Meltzer et Richard, « A Rational Theory of the Size of Government ».
109 Weiss, Carol H. et Barton, Allen H. (dir.), Making Bureaucracies Work (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1980).Google Scholar
110 Ardant, « Financial Policy and Economic Infrastructure of Modern States and Nations ».
111 Ardant, Gabriel, Histoire de l'import (Paris: Fayard, 1971).Google Scholar
112 Rose, Richard et Peters, Guy, Can Government Go Bankrupt? (New York: Basic Books, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
113 Larkey, Stolp et Winer, « Theorizing About the Growth of Government: A Research Assessment », 204.