Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:42:01.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Local Determinants of Representation: Party Constituency Associations, Candidate Nomination and Gender

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2019

William P. Cross
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel by Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6
Scott Pruysers*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: scott.pruysers@ryerson.ca

Abstract

It is well established that political parties play a key role as gatekeepers to elected office. This article explores the local determinants of a diverse candidate pool. In particular, we seek to uncover the district- or riding-specific party factors that are related to women's participation in the parties’ candidate nomination stages. That is, why do some nomination races in a party have no women contestants, while others have many? Using data from an original survey of party constituency association presidents, as well as extensive nomination data from Elections Canada, we demonstrate that a number of local factors are related to the presence of women contesting a party's nomination. Local party associations with a woman serving as president, as well as associations that hold earlier and longer nominations, are significantly more likely to see a woman enter the contest. The results are important since they call attention to what parties do at the grassroots level, as well as highlight practical solutions for parties seeking to have more diversity in their candidate pool.

Résumé

Il est bien établi que les partis politiques jouent un rôle clé en tant que gardiens de l'accès aux fonctions électives. Cet article explore les déterminants locaux d'un bassin de candidats diversifié. En particulier, nous cherchons à découvrir les facteurs propres au district ou à la circonscription qui sont liés à la participation des femmes aux étapes de la mise en candidature des partis. Autrement dit, pourquoi certaines courses à l'investiture dans un parti n'ont-elles pas de candidates, alors que d'autres en ont beaucoup ? À l'aide des données d'un sondage original mené auprès des présidents d'associations de circonscription, ainsi que des données détaillées d'Élections Canada sur les mises en candidature, nous démontrons qu'un certain nombre de facteurs locaux sont liés à la présence de femmes qui contestent la candidature d'un parti. Les associations de partis locaux dont la présidente est une femme, de même que les associations qui présentent des candidatures plus tôt et plus longtemps, sont beaucoup plus susceptibles de voir une femme participer à la course. Les résultats sont importants, car ils attirent l'attention sur ce que font les partis à la base et mettent en lumière des solutions pratiques pour les partis qui cherchent à diversifier davantage leur bassin de candidats.

Type
Research Article/Étude originale
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, Andrea. 2018. “Party Organization and Gender in European Elections.” Party Politics. Online First. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818806630Google Scholar
Allen, Peter and Cutts, David. 2018. “Aspirant Candidate Behaviour and Progressive Political Ambition.” Research & Politics 4 (1): 19.Google Scholar
Ashe, Jeanette and Stewart, Kennedy. 2012. “Legislative Recruitment: Using Diagnostic Testing to Explain Underrepresentation.” Party Politics 18 (5): 687707.10.1177/1354068810389635Google Scholar
Bolleyer, Nicole. 2012. “New Party Organization in Western Europe: Of Hierarchies, Stratarchies and Federations.” Party Politics 18 (3): 315–36.10.1177/1354068810382939Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay and Verba, Sydney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Daniel, and Preece, Jessica. 2016. “Recruitment and Perceptions of Gender Bias in Party Leader Support.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (4): 842–51.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan and Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2013. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199322428.001.0001Google Scholar
Carty, Kenneth. 2002. “The Politics of Tecumseh Corners: Canadian Political Parties as Franchise Organizations.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 35 (4): 723–45.Google Scholar
Carty, Kenneth. 2004. “Parties as Franchise Systems: The Stratarchical Organizational Imperative.” Party Politics 10 (1): 524.10.1177/1354068804039118Google Scholar
Carty, Kenneth and Cross, William. 2006. “Can Stratarchically Organized Parties Be Democratic? Evidence from the Canadian Experience.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 16 (2): 93114.Google Scholar
Carty, Kenneth and Eagles, Munroe. 2005. Politics Is Local: National Politics at the Grassroots. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caul, Miki. 1999. “Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 5 (1): 7998.Google Scholar
Caul, Miki. 2001. “Political Parties and Candidate Gender Policies: A Cross-National Study.” Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1214–29.Google Scholar
Cheng, Christine and Tavits, Margit. 2011. “Informal Influences in Selecting Female Political Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (2): 460–71.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah. 2013. “Intra-Party Democracy: A Gendered Critique and a Feminist Agenda.” In The Challenges of Intra-Party Democracy, ed. Cross, William and Katz, Richard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah and Krook, Mona Lena. 2008. “Critical Mass Theory and Women's Political Representation.” Political Studies 56 (3): 725–36.Google Scholar
Cross, William. 2002. “Grassroots Participation in Candidate Nominations.” In Citizen Politics: Research and Theory in Canadian Political Behaviour, ed. Everitt, Joanna and O'Neill, Brenda. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cross, William. 2004. Political Parties. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Cross, William. 2006. “Candidate Nomination in Canadian Political Parties.” In The Canadian General Election of 2006, ed. Pammett, Jon and Dornan, Christopher. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Cross, William. 2016a. “The Importance of Local Party Activity in Understanding Canadian Politics: Winning from the Ground Up in the 2015 Federal Election.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 601–20.10.1017/S0008423916000962Google Scholar
Cross, William. 2016b. “Understanding Power-Sharing within Political Parties: Stratarchy as Mutual Interdependence between the Party in the Centre and the Party on the Ground.” Government and Opposition 53 (2): 203–30.Google Scholar
Cross, William and Gauja, Anika. 2014. “Designing Candidate Selection Methods: Exploring Diversity in Australian Political Parties.” Australian Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 2239.10.1080/10361146.2013.873769Google Scholar
Cross, William, Kenig, Ofer, Pruysers, Scott and Rahat, Gideon. 2016. The Promise and Challenge of Party Primary Elections: A Comparative Perspective. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Cross, William and Pruysers, Scott. 2017. “Sore Losers? The Costs of Intra-party Democracy.” Party Politics. Online First. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817728216Google Scholar
Cross, William and Young, Lisa. 2004. “The Contours of Party Membership in Canada.” Party Politics 10 (4): 427–44.10.1177/1354068804043907Google Scholar
Cross, William and Young, Lisa. 2013. “Candidate Recruitment in Canada: The Role of Political Parties.” In Parties, Elections, and the Future of Canadian Politics, ed. Bittner, Amanda and Koop, Royce. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2013. “Gendered Recruitment without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women's Representation.” Politics & Gender 9 (4): 390413.Google Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody and Smith, Adrienne. 2015. “How the Strategic Context Affects Women's Emergence and Success in Local Legislative Elections.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (2): 295317.Google Scholar
Cutts, David, Childs, Sarah and Fieldhouse, Edward. 2008. “’This Is What Happens When You Don't Listen’: All-Women Shortlists at the 2005 General Election.” Party Politics 14 (5): 575–95.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2007. “Electoral Gender Quotas: Between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result.” Representation 43 (2): 7392.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Eldersveld, Samuel. 1964. Political Parties: A Behavioral Analysis. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Erickson, Lynda. 1991. “Women and Candidacies for the House of Commons.” In Women in Canadian Politics: Toward Equity in Representation, ed. Megyery, Kathy. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard and Lawless, Jennifer. 2005. “To Run or Not to Run for Office: Explaining Nascent Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 642–59.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00147.xGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard and Lawless, Jennifer. 2010. “If Only They'd Ask: Gender, Recruitment, and Political Ambition.” Journal of Politics 72 (2): 310–26.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2012. The Impact of Gender Quotas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fulton, Sarah. 2012. “Running Backwards and in High Heels: The Gendered Quality Gap and Incumbent Electoral Success.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2): 303–14.Google Scholar
Fulton, Sarah. 2014. “When Gender Matters: Macro-dynamics and Micro-mechanisms.” Political Behaviour 36 (3): 605–30.Google Scholar
Hazan, Reuven and Rahat, Gideon. 2010. Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holman, Mirya and Schneider, Monica. 2018. “Gender, Race, and Political Ambition: How Intersectionality and Frames Influence Interest in Political Office.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 6 (2): 264–80.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Union, Inter-Parliamentary. 2018. “Women in National Parliaments.” http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm. Accessed July 20, 2018.Google Scholar
Kanthak, Kristin and Woon, Jonathan. 2015. “Women Don't Run? Election Aversion and Candidate Entry.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 595612.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, Sean. 2016. “Longtime NDP Organizer Calls Nomination Process ‘Unethical’ and ‘Sneaky.’” CBC News. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/point-douglas-bernadette-smith-ndp-sel-burrows-kevin-chief-nomination-1.3946762. Accessed July 20, 2018.Google Scholar
Kenny, Meryl. 2013. Gender and Political Recruitment: Theorizing Institutional Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2004. “Gender Quotas as a Global Political Phenomenon: Actors and Strategies in Quota Adoption.” European Political Science 3 (3): 5964.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2010. “Why Are Fewer Women than Men Elected? Gender and the Dynamics of Candidate Selection.” Political Studies Review 8 (2): 155–68.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2014. “Electoral Gender Quotas: A Conceptual Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (9): 1268–93.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, Lovenduski, Joni and Squires, Judith. 2009. “Gender Quotas and Models of Political Citizenship.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 781803.Google Scholar
Kunovich, Sheri and Paxton, Pamela. 2005. “Pathways to Power: The Role of Political Parties in Women's National Political Representation.” Journal of Sociology 111 (2): 505–52.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer and Fox, Richard. 2005. It Takes a Candidate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liberal Party of Canada. 2013. “National Rules for the Selection of Candidates for the Liberal Party of Canada.” https://www.liberal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/national-nomination-rules.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2018Google Scholar
Lilliefeldt, Emelie. 2012. “Party and Gender in Western Europe Revisited: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Gender-Balanced Parliamentary Parties.” Party Politics 18 (2): 193214.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2016. “The Supply and Demand Model of Candidate Selection: Some Reflections.” Government and Opposition 51 (3): 513–28.10.1017/gov.2016.7Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni and Norris, Pippa, eds. 1993. Gender and Party Politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard and Studlar, Donley. 1996. “The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single-Member District and Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Canada and Norway.” Journal of Politics 58 (3): 707–33.10.2307/2960439Google Scholar
Milan, Anne, Keown, Leslie-Anne and Urquijo, Covadonga Robles. 2011. “Families, Living Arrangements and Unpaid Work. Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2006. “Recruitment.” In Handbook of Party Politics, ed. Katz, Richard S. and Crotty, William. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa and Lovenduski, Joni. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ondercin, Heather L. and Welch, Susan. 2009. “Comparing Predictors of Women's Congressional Election Success: Candidates, Primaries, and the General Election.” American Politics Research 37 (4): 593613.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Brenda and Thomas, Melanee. 2015. “’Because It's 2015’: Gender and the 2015 Election.” In The Canadian Federal Election of 2015, ed. Pammett, Jon and Dornan, Christopher. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Barbara and Simon, Dennis. 2010. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women and Congressional Elections. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela and Kunovich, Sheri. 2003. “Women's Political Representation: The Importance of Ideology.” Social Forces 81 (5): 87114.Google Scholar
Preece, Jessica and Stoddard, Olga. 2015. “Does the Message Matter? A Field Experiment on Political Party Recruitment.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 2 (1): 2635.Google Scholar
Preece, Jessica, Stoddard, Olga and Fisher, Rachel. 2016. “Run, Jane, Run! Gendered Responses to Political Party Recruitment.” Political Behavior 38 (3): 561–77.Google Scholar
Pruysers, Scott. 2015. “Two Political Worlds? Multi-level Campaign Integration in Canadian Constituencies.” Regional and Federal Studies 25 (2): 165–82.Google Scholar
Pruysers, Scott and Blais, Julie. 2014. “Anything Women Can Do Men Can Do Better: An Experiment Examining the Effects of Stereotype Threat on Political Knowledge and Efficacy.” The Social Science Journal 51 (3): 341–49.Google Scholar
Pruysers, Scott and Blais, Julie. 2017. “Why Won't Lola Run? An Experiment Examining Stereotype Threat and Political Ambition.” Politics & Gender 13 (2): 232–52.Google Scholar
Pruysers, Scott and Blais, Julie. 2018a. “Narcissistic Women and Cash-Strapped Men: Who Can Be Encouraged to Consider Running for Office and Who Should Do the Encouraging?” Political Research Quarterly. Online First.Google Scholar
Pruysers, Scott and Blais, Julie. 2018b. “A Little Encouragement Goes a (Not So) Long Way: An Experiment to Increase Political Ambition Among Young Women.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 39 (3): 384–95.Google Scholar
Pruysers, Scott and Cross, William. 2016. “Candidate Selection in Canada.” American Behavioral Scientist 60 (7): 781–98.Google Scholar
Pruysers, Scott, Cross, William, Gauja, Anika and Rahat, Gideon. 2017. “Candidate Selection Rules and Democratic Outcomes: The Impact of Parties on Women's Representation.” In Organizing Representation: Political Parties, Participation, and Power, ed. Scarrow, Susan, Webb, Paul and Poguntke, Thomas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rahat, Gideon, Hazan, Reuven Y. and Katz, Richard S.. 2008. “Democracy and Political Parties: On the Uneasy Relationship between Participation, Competition and Representation.” Party Politics 14 (6): 663–83.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. “Do Parties Know That ‘Women Win’? Party Leader Beliefs about Women's Electoral Chances.” Politics & Gender 2 (4): 431–50.Google Scholar
Sayers, Anthony. 1999. Parties, Candidates, and Constituency Campaigns in Canada, Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie and Mishler, William. 2005. “An Integrated Model of Women's Representation.” Journal of Politics 67 (2): 407–28.Google Scholar
Thomas, Melanee. 2012. “The Complexity Conundrum: Why Hasn't the Gender Gap in Subjective Political Competence Closed?Canadian Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 337–58.10.1017/S0008423912000352Google Scholar
Thomas, Melanee and Bittner, Amanda, eds. 2017. Mothers and Others: The Role of Parenthood in Politics. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Melanee and Bodet, Marc André. 2013. “Sacrificial Lambs, Women Candidates, and District Competitiveness in Canada.” Electoral Studies 32 (1): 153–66.Google Scholar
Tolley, Erin. 2017. “The Politics of the Pool: Racialized Minorities and Political Recruitment in Canada.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Manon and Pelletier, Réjean. 2001. “More Women Constituency Party Presidents: A Strategy for Increasing the Number of Women Candidates in Canada?Party Politics 7 (2): 157190.Google Scholar
Vandeleene, Audrey. 2014. “Gender Quotas and Women Friendly Candidate Selection: Evidence from Belgium.” Representation 50 (3): 337–49.Google Scholar