Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:33:58.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Losing Heart: Declining Support and the Political Marketing of the Afghanistan Mission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2009

Joseph F. Fletcher ,
Heather Bastedo  and
Jennifer Hove
Joseph F. Fletcher*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Heather Bastedo*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Jennifer Hove*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
*
Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, Room 3018, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3. Email: josephf@chass.utoronto.ca
Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, Room 3018, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3. Email: heather.bastedo@utoronto.ca
Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, Room 3018, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3. Email: j.hove@utoronto.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. Public opinion shifted markedly between 2006 and 2007 regarding Canadian military participation in Afghanistan. Multivariate analysis of survey data reveals that the interplay of cognitive and emotional responses fractured support and consolidated opposition to the mission. Subsequently, a major government communication strategy, aimed at bolstering support for the Afghan mission succeeded at an informational level but failed to connect at an emotional one, leaving overall support for the mission essentially unchanged. Our analysis points to the need for nuanced interpretation of shifts in public support for war as well as in assessing political marketing efforts by government.

Résumé. L'opinion publique s'est nettement décalée entre 2006 et 2007 concernant la participation militaire canadienne en Afghanistan. L'analyse multi variée des données d'aperçu indique que l'effet des réponses cognitives et émotives a divisé l'appui et a consolidé l'opposition à la mission. D'ailleurs, une stratégie importante de communication du gouvernement, destinée à augmenter le soutien de la mission afghane a réussi à un niveau informationnel, mais ne s'est pas reliée au niveau émotif, laissant le soutien global de la mission essentiellement inchangé. Notre analyse indique le besoin d'une interprétation diversifiée et nuancée des variations de soutien public face à la guerre ainsi qu'une évaluation du marketing politique du gouvernement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 911 - 937
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berinsky, Adam J. and Druckman, James N.. 2007. “Public Opinion Research and Support for the Iraq War.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71(1).Google Scholar
Bleiker, Roland and Hutchinson, Emma. 2008. “Fear no more: emotions and world politics.” Review of International Studies 34(S1): 115–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brader, Ted. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts and Golder, Matt. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14(1): 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. 1996. “Regression Artifacts in Time-Series and Longitudinal Data.” Evaluation and Program Planning 19(4): 377–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canada. 2008. Protecting Canadians, Rebuilding Afghanistan. News Archive 2007. http://www.canada-afghanistan.gc.ca/cip-pic/afghanistan/library/archive07-en.asp (May 1, 2008).Google Scholar
Canada. DFAIT. 2008. Speaking notes for the Honourable Gordon J. O'Connor, Minister of National Defence, for the January cross-country tour. http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/newsroom/view_news_e.asp?id=2181 (May 1, 2008).Google Scholar
Canada. Office of the Prime Minister. 2008. Prime Minister Stephen announces additional funding for aid in Afghanistan. http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?category=2&id=1555 (May 1, 2008).Google Scholar
Canadian Press. 2008. “Kandahar means combat, Hillier says.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), February 1. http://www.globeandmail.com (February 3, 2008).Google Scholar
Chase, Steven. 2006. “Bloc wants urgent debate on foreign file.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), September 5, A9.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston and Sapiro, Virginia. 1993. “Gender, Feminist Consciousness, and War.” American Journal of Political Science 37(4): 1079–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 1994. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Kirkwood, NY: Putnam Publishing.Google Scholar
Eichenberg, Richard C. 2003. “Gender Differences in Public Attitudes toward the Use of Force by the United States, 1990–2003.” International Security, 28(1): 110–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Environics-CBC. 2007. Poll among Afghanis in September 2007. http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/afghanistan/Afghan-survey2007.html (October 17, 2007).Google Scholar
Everts, Phillip P. 2002. Democracy and Military Force. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, Scott Sigmund. 2008. “The Multiple Effects of Casualties on Public Support for War: An Experimental Approach.” American Political Science Review 102(1): 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivison, John. 2008. “Manley report invokes the spirit of Pearson.” National Post (Toronto) January 23, http://www.nationalpost.com (February 2, 2008).Google Scholar
Kirton, John J. 2007a. “Two Solitudes, One War: Public Opinion, National Unity and Canada's War in Afghanistan.” http://www.g7.utoronto.ca/scholar/kirton2007/kirton-afghanistan-071008.pdf (January 21, 2008).Google Scholar
Kirton, John J. 2007b. Canadian Foreign Policy in a Changing World. Toronto: Thompson-Nelson.Google Scholar
Laghi, Brian and Freeman, Alan. 2007. “Canadians cool to extending mission,” Toronto Star (Ontario ed.), July 19, A13.Google Scholar
Létourneau, Charles and Massie, Justin. 2005. “L'Afghanistan: archétype d'une ‘nouvelle’ politique étrangère canadienne?” Policy Options Dec. 2006–Jan. 2007.Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton, Taber, Charles and Weber, Christopher. 2006. “First Steps toward a Dual-Process Accessibility Model of Political Beliefs, Attitudes and Behaviour,” Ch. 2 in Redlawsk, David P. ed. Feeling Politics: Emotion in Political Information Processing. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
MacCharles, Tonda. 2003. “Canadian troops get role in Afghanistan.” Toronto Star (Ontario ed.), February 13, A1.Google Scholar
Marcus, George. 2002. “Emotions in Politics,” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 221–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, George, Sullivan, John L., Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth and Wood, Sandra. 1995. With Malice Toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintz, Alex and Redd, Stephen J.. 2003. “Framing Effects in International Relations.” Synthese 135: 193–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuman, Russell W., Marcus, George E., Crigler, Ann N. and eds, Michael MacKuen.. 2007. The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Newman, Bruce I. 1999. The Mass Marketing of Politics. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin and Shapiro, Robert. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in American Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, Paul. 2004. Weapons of Mass Persuasion: Marketing the War Against Iraq. Toronto: University of Toronto PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheth, Jagdish N., Newman, Bruce I. and Gross, Barbara L.. 1991. Consumption Values and Market Choices. Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2004. “Opinion Representation and Policy Feedback: Canada in Comparative Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 37(3): 531–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Janice and Lang, Eugene. 2007. The Unexpected War: Canada in Kandahar. Toronto: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, Barbara G. and Fidell, Linda S.. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
Taber, Jane. 2008. “Turtle Talk Wins the Race.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), February 22. http://www.theglobeandmail.com (May 13, 2008).Google Scholar
The Strategic Counsel. 2006a. Perceptions and Views of Canadian Armed Forces Troops in Afghanistan, a Report to the Globe and Mail and CTV, March 13. http://www.thestrategiccounsel.com/our_news/polls.asp (March 3, 2008).Google Scholar
The Strategic Counsel. 2006b. Public Perceptions of Canada's Role in Afghanistan, a Report to The Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada, POR#243–06.Google Scholar
The Strategic Counsel. 2007. Perceptions of the Conservative Government, Troops in Afghanistan and Terrorism, a Report to the Globe and Mail and CTV, July 20. http://www.thestrategiccounsel.com/our_news/polls.asp (March 3, 2008).Google Scholar
Toronto Star. Editorial. 2007. “Three more are fallen.” Toronto Star (Ontario ed.), June 23, A7.Google Scholar
Toronto Star. Editorial. 2008. “Recast Canada's Afghan mission.” Toronto Star, January 23. http://www.thestar.com (February 2, 2008).Google Scholar
Travers, Jim. 2003. “Leadership' a triumph of twisted logic.” Toronto Star (Ontario ed.), February 15, E02.Google Scholar
Westen, Drew. 2007. The Political Brain. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Western, Jon. 2005. Selling Intervention & War: The Presidency, the Media, and the American Public. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Alan. 2007. “To Sell Canada on War.” The Toronto Star, 17 February. http://www.embassymag.ca/html/index.php?display=story&full_path≠2007/august/15/report (Dec. 1, 2007).Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar