Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:51:41.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mobilisation pénale et cycle politique au Canada : étude de cas de 104 résidents permanents haïtiens déportés pour criminalité entre 1989 et 2009

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2016

Marc Tremblay-Faulkner
Marc Tremblay-Faulkner*
Affiliation:
Département de science politiqueUniversité de Montréal
*
Département de science politique, Université de Montréal, Email: marc.tremblay-faulkner@umontreal.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Criminal deportation policy in Canada follows a cyclical rather than a linear or partisan pattern. Based on a case study of Haitian residents deported between 1989 and 2009, I argue that criminal deportation cannot be explained as a stable proportion of the pool of permanent residents, but rather in terms of the political attention it generates. A change-point analysis identified two separate political mobilization phases. During the first phase (1994–1998), the integration of long-term residents is defined as a political issue and is translated into legislation (Bill C-44). The second phase (2003–2005) is a new episode of expansion that reformulated the issue around the concepts of risk and efficiency (Bill C-11). Despite recent legal reforms designed to accelerate removals of foreign criminals (Bills C-43 and C-60), the arrival of the Conservative Party (2006–2009) coincided with a decrease in criminal deportations during the period under review.

Résumé

La politique de déportation criminelle épouse une trajectoire cyclique et non partisane. Sur la base d'une étude de cas de résidents haïtiens déportés pour criminalité entre 1989 et 2009, je soutiens que la déportation criminelle ne s'explique pas comme une proportion stable du bassin de résidents permanents mais par l'attention politique qu'elle génère. Une analyse de points de rupture multiple distingue deux phases de mobilisation pénales distinctes. La première phase (1994–1998) correspond à la désignation du problème, puis à sa formulation en projet de loi (C-44). La deuxième phase (2003–2005) correspond à un nouvel épisode de durcissement par une reformulation de l'enjeu autour des notions de risque et d'efficacité (C-11). Malgré le dépôt de réformes législatives visant à accélérer la politique de déportation criminelle (C-43, C-60), l'arrivée du Parti conservateur (2006–2009) correspond à une baisse de la mobilisation pénale durant la période à l’étude.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 601 - 623
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliographie

Bale, Tim et coll. 2010. « If You Can't Beat Them, Join Them? Explaining Social Democratic Responses to the Challenge from the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe ». Political Studies 58 (3): 410–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Annmarie. 2009. « Displacing danger: managing crime through deportation ». Journal of International Migration and Integration/Revue de l'intégration et de la migration internationale 10 (4): 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Jones, Bryan D. et Mortensen, Peter B.. 2014. « Punctuated equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in public policymaking ». Dans Theories of the policy process, 3e édition, dirs. Sabatier, Paul A. et Weible, Christopher M.. Denver : Westview Press, 59–103.Google Scholar
Birkland, Thomas A. 1997. After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events. Georgetown : Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Birkland, Thomas A. 1998. « Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting ». Journal of Public Policy 18 (1): 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloemraad, Irene. 2006. Becoming a Citizen: Incorporating Immigrants and Refugees in the United States and Canada. Berkeley : University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1994. « Are Immigration Controls Really Falling? » Dans Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, dirs. Wayne A. Cornelius, Philip L. Martin et James F. Hollifield. Stanford : Stanford University Press, 227–231.Google Scholar
Canada. Révision sur la législation sur l'immigration. 1998a. Not Just Numbers : A Canadian Framework for Future Immigration. Ottawa : Ministère des Travaux publics et services gouvernementaux.Google Scholar
Canada. Citoyenneté et Immigration. 1998b. De solides assises pour le 21e siècle : Nouvelles orientations pour la politique et la législation relatives aux immigrants et aux réfugiés. Ottawa : Travaux publics et services gouvernementaux.Google Scholar
Canada. Agence des services frontaliers du Canada. 2008. Étude d'évaluation. Rapport final sur les Programmes de détention et de renvoi de l'ASFC. Décembre 2010. Ottawa : Agences des services frontaliers du Canada.Google Scholar
Canada. 2013a. Statistiques Canada. Table 385-0002. Federal, provincial and territorial general government revenue and expenditures, for fiscal year ending March 31st, annual (dollars). CANSIM (base de données).Google Scholar
Canada. 2013b. Citoyenneté et immigration Canada. Soutien à la Loi accélérant le renvoi de criminels étrangers. Ottawa : Citoyenneté et immigration Canada.Google Scholar
Canada. Citoyenneté et Immigration Canada. 2014. Profil d'organisme - Commission de l'immigration et du statut de réfugié. Ottawa : Citoyenneté et Immigration Canada.Google Scholar
Canada. 2015a. Emploi et Immigration Canada. Statistiques de l'immigration. Politique de l'immigration et de la Démographie (1981–1993). Ottawa : Emploi et Immigration Canada.Google Scholar
Canada. 2015b. Citoyenneté et Immigration Canada. Statistiques sur l'immigration/Statistiques sur la citoyenneté et l'immigration (1992–1996). Ottawa: Citoyenneté et Immigration Canada.Google Scholar
Canada. 2015c. Statistiques Canada. Table 91-209-X. Immigrants reçus au Canada selon le pays de naissance, 1981 à 2011. Ottawa : Citoyenneté et Immigration Canada.Google Scholar
Cohen, Russell P. 1994. « Fundamental (In)Justice: The Deportation of Long-Term Residents from Canada ». Osgoode Hall Law Journal 32 (3): 457–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A. 2001. « The Structural Embeddedness of Demand for Mexican Immigrant Labor: New Evidence from California ». Dans Interdisciplinary Perspectives On The New Immigration : Theoretical Perspectives, dirs Suárez-Orozco, Marcelo M., Suárez-Orozco, Carola et Qin-Hilliard, Desirée. Londres : Routledge, 139–81.Google Scholar
Crepaz, Markus M. L. 2008. Trust Beyond Borders: Immigration, the Welfare State, and Identity in Modern Societies. Detroit : University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dent, John. 2001. « No right to appeal: Bill C-11, Criminality and the Human Rights of Permanent Residents Facing Deportation ». Queen's Law journal 27 : 749–84.Google Scholar
Descormiers, Karine et Morselli, Carlo. 2011. « Alliances, conflicts, and contradictions in Montreal's street gang landscape ». International Criminal Justice Review 21 (3): 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1972. « Up and Down with Ecology–The ‘Issue-Attention Cycle’ ». The Public Interest 28: 38–50.Google Scholar
Dromisky, Stan. 1998. Immigration detention and removals. Rapport du Comité permanent de la citoyenneté et de l'immigration. Ottawa : Comité permanent de la citoyenneté et de l'immigration.Google Scholar
Ellermann, Antje. 2005. « Coercive Capacity and The Politics of Implementation Deportation in Germany and the United States ». Comparative Political Studies 38 (10): 1219–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellermann, Antje. 2006. « Street-Level Democracy: How Immigration Bureaucrats Manage Public Opposition ». West European Politics 29 (2): 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellermann, Antje. 2009. States against Migrants: Deportation in Germany and the United States. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Ron. 2013. Unjust by Design. Vancouver : UBC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Gary P. 2002. « Winners and Losers: Politics and the Costs and Benefits of Migration ». Dans West European Immigration and Immigrant Policy in the New Century, dir. Messina, Anthony M.. Westport : Praeger, 77–96.Google Scholar
Freeman, Gary P. 2006. « National Models, Policy Types, and the Politics of Immigration in Liberal Democracies ». West European Politics 29 (2): 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibney, Matthew J. et Hansen, Randall. 2003. Deportation and the Liberal State: The Forcible Return of Asylum Seekers and Unlawful migrants in Canada, Germany and the United Kingdom. Genève : UNHCR Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit.Google Scholar
Givens, Terri E. 2005. Voting Radical Right in Western Europe. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givens, Terri E. et Luedtke, Adam. 2005. « European Immigration Policies in Comparative Perspective: Issue Salience, Partisanship and Immigrant Rights ». Comparative European Politics 3 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haigh, Richard et Smith, Jim. 1998. « Return of the Chancellor's Foot? Discretion in Permanent Resident Deportation Appeals Under the Immigration Act ». Osgood Hall Law Review 36 (2): 245–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harell, Allison. 2009. « Minority-Majority Relations in Canada: The Rights Regime and the Adoption of Multicultural Values ». Ottawa. Communication présentée à l'Association canadienne de science politique.Google Scholar
Hollifield, James F. 2000. « Migration and the ‘New’ International Order: The Missing Regime ». Dans Managing Migration: The Need for a New International Regime, dir. Gosh, Bimal. Oxford : Oxford: Oxford University Press, 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollifield, James F. 2010. « American Immigration Policy and Politics: An Enduring Controversy ». Dans Developments in American Politics, dirs. Peele, Gillian, Bailey, Christopher J., Cain, Bruce et Peters, B. Guy. New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 256–81.Google Scholar
Hollifield, James F., Martin, Philip L. et Orrenius, Pia M. (dir.). 2014. Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, 3e édition. Stanford : Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
John, P., Bertelli, A., Jennings, W. et Bevan, S. 2013. Policy Agendas in British Politics. New York : Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan D. 2001. Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D. et Baumgartner, Frank R.. 2005a. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D. et Baumgartner, Frank R.. 2005b. « A Model of Choice for Public Policy ». Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (3): 325–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 1998. « Why Liberal States Accept Unwanted Immigration ». World Politics 50 (2): 266–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, James B. 2001. « Reconciling Rights and Federalism during Review of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Centralization Thesis, 1982 to 1999 ». Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 34 (2): 321–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York : Harper and Collins.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2005. « The Uncertain Futures of Multiculturalism ». Canadian Diversity 4 (1): 82–85.Google Scholar
Lubbers, Marcel, Gijsberts, Mérove et Scheepers, Peer. 2002. « Extreme Right-Wing Voting in Western Europe ». European Journal of Political Research 41 (3): 345–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Philip L. 2014. « The United States: The Continuing Immigration Debate ». Dans Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, 3e édition, dirs. Hollified, James F., Martin, Philip L. et Orrenius, Pia M.. Stanford : Stanford University Press, 47–77.Google Scholar
Messina, Anthony M. 2007. The Logic and Politics of Post-WWII Migration to Western Europe. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parti conservateur. 2014. Assurer la sécurité de nos rues et de nos communautés. Parti conservateur du Canada.Google Scholar
Pratt, Anna. 2005. Securing Borders: Detention and Deportation in Canada. Vancouver : UBC Press.Google Scholar
Québec. 2014. Immigration, Diversité et Inclusion. Portraits statistiques. L'immigration permanente au Québec selon les catégories d'immigration et quelques composantes. 2009–2013. Québec : Immigration, Diversité et Inclusion.Google Scholar
Reitz, Jeffrey G. 2014. « Canada: New Initiatives and Approaches to Immigration and Nation Building ». Dans Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, 3e édition, dirs. Hollified, James F., Martin, Philip L. et Orrenius, Pia M.. Stanford : Stanford University Press, 88–116.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 1988. The Mobility of Capital and Labor. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Anne et Ingram, Helen. 1993. « Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy ». American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Anne L. et Ingram, Helen M.. 1997. Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence : University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Schuck, Peter H. 1998. Citizens, Strangers and In-Betweens: Essays on Immigration and Citizenship. Boulder : Westview Press.Google Scholar
Thielemann, Eiko. 2003. « European Burden-Sharing and Forced Migration ». Journal of Refugee Studies 16 (3): 223–35.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Pierre, Charest, Mathieu, Charette, Yanick et Tremblay-Faulkner, Marc. 2015 (sous presse). Le délinquant affilié : capital social, leadership et sous-culture. Montréal : Liber.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1980. « The Politics of Regulation ». Dans The Politics of Regulation, dir. Wilson, James Q. New York : Basic Books, 357–394.Google Scholar
Wortley, Scott, Hagan, John et Macmillan, Ross. 1997. « Just Des (s) erts? The Racial Polarization of Perceptions of Criminal Injustice ». Law and Society Review 31 (4): 637–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Matthew et Bloemraad, Irene. 2012. « Is There a Trade-off Between Multiculturalism and Socio-Political Integration? Policy Regimes and Immigrant Incorporation in Comparative Perspective ». Perspectives on Politics 10 (1): 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar