Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:01:17.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on “Hartz-Horowitz at Twenty”: The Case of French Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Nelson Wiseman
Nelson Wiseman
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an assessment of Louis Hartz's fragment theory, H. D. Forbes contends that its basic weaknesses are most easily exposed in the case of French Canada. This article argues the opposite: Hartz's approach in this case is particularly illuminating rather than representing its Achilles’ heel. Hartzian analysis is consistent with the historiography of French Canada. The growth of liberalism in the nineteenth century that Forbes points to in the French-Canadian fragment pales when placed in a comparative perspective as Hartz's theory requires. It is the mix of feudal and liberal ideas in the twentieth century that helps to explain the rise of social democratic forces like the Parti québécois.

Résumé

Dans une évaluation de la théorie du fragment de Louis Hartz, H. D. Forbes soutient que ses faiblesses principales sont les plus manifestement exposées dans le cas du Canada franéçais. Cet article prétend le contraire: l’approche de Hartz dans ce cas est particuliérement éclairante plutôt que représentative de son talon d’Achille. L’analyse de Hartz est consistante s’agissant de l’historiographie du Canada français. La montée du libéralisme au 19e siècle que Forbes met en evidence dans le fragment canadien-français pâlit lorsqu’on la place en perspective comparative comme l’exige la théorie de Hartz. C’est le mélange d’idées féodales et libérates au 20e siècle qui permet d’expliquer l’avènement des forces social-démocrates telles que le Parti québécois.

Type
Comment/Commentaire
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 1988 , pp. 795 - 806
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Forbes, H. D., “Hartz-Horowitz at Twenty: Nationalism, Toryism and Socialism in Canada and the United States,” this JOURNAL 20 (1987), 287–315, at 289. Quotations from this source are hereafter acknowledged parenthetically in the text.Google Scholar

2 See for example Winn, Conrad and Twiss, James, “The Spatial Analysis of Political Cleavages and the Case of the Ontario Legislature,” this JOURNAL 10 (1977), 287–310Google Scholar; Truman, Tom, “A Scale for Measuring a Tory Streak in Canada and the United States,” this JOURNAL 10 (1977), 597–614Google Scholar; , RodPreece, “The Myth of the Red Tory,”. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory 1 (1977), 3–28Google Scholar; Horowitz, Gad, “The ‘Myth’ of the RedTory?” Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory 1 (1977), 87–88Google Scholar; and Horowitz, Gad, “Notes on ‘Conservatism, Liberalism and Socialism in Canada,’ ” this JOURNAL 11 (1978), 383–99.Google Scholar

3 Hartz, Louis, The Liberal Tradition in America (Cambridge: Harcourt, Brace, 1955), 3. References to this source are hereafter parenthetical, using the abbreviation LTA.Google Scholar

4 Hartz, Louis et al., The Founding of New Societies (Cambridge: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1964), 3. References to this source are hereafter parenthetical, using the abbreviation FNS.Google Scholar

5 Horowitz, Gad, “Conservatism, Liberalism, and Socialism in Canada: An Interpretation,” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 32 (1966), 143–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Wiseman, Nelson, “The Pattern of Prairie Politics,” Queen's Quarterly 88 (1981), 298–315Google Scholar; and Wiseman, Nelson, “An Historical Note on Religion and Parties on the Prairies,” Journal of Canadian Studies 16 (1981), 109–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Hartz, Louis to Horowitz, Gad, October 29, 1965. I am grateful to Gad Horowitz for providing access to his correspondence and files.Google Scholar

8 Soderlund, Walter C., Nelson, Ralph C., and Wagenberg, Ronald H., “A Critique of the Hartz Theory of Political Development as Applied to Canada,” Comparative Politics 12 (1979), 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 See for example Archibald, Clinton, “Corporatist Tendencies in Quebec,” in Gagnon, Alain G. (ed.), Quebec: State and Society (Toronto: Methuen, 1984), 353–64.Google Scholar

10 Quoted in Cook, Ramsay, The Maple Leaf Forever (Toronto: Macmillan, 1971), 125.Google Scholar

11 Gingras, François-Pierre and Nevitte, Neil, “Nationalism in Quebec: An Incomplete Secular Revolution,” in Fox, Paul and White, Graham (eds.), Politics: Canada (6th ed.; Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1987), 244.Google Scholar

12 Monière, Denis, Ideologies in Quebec (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1981), 102.Google Scholar

13 Balthazar, Louis, “Les idées politiques de Louis-Joseph Papineau: une étude comparative” (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 1970); cited in Kenneth D. McRae, “Louis Hartz's Impact on Political Thought in Canada,” paper presented at the Harvard University Symposium on Louis Hartz, January 1987.Google Scholar

14 Hartz, to Horowitz, , October 29, 1965.Google Scholar

15 Cook, , The Maple Leaf Forever, 121.Google Scholar

16 Cook, Ramsay, Canada and the French Canadian Question (Toronto: Macmillan, 1967), 106.Google Scholar

17 Quebec Statutes, 25–26V, George, chap. 82; Seigniorial Rent Abolition Act, 299–308.Google Scholar

18 Wade, Mason, The French Canadians, 1760–1945 (Cambridge, 1955), 837.Google Scholar

19 Cook, , The Maple Leaf Forever, 137–38; emphasis added.Google Scholar

20 Ibid., 106; and Monière, , Ideologies in Quebec, 183.Google Scholar

21 Trudeau, Pierre Elliot, Federalism and the French Canadians (Toronto: Macmillan, 1977), 104.Google Scholar

22 Ibid., 114.

23 Rioux, Marcel, “The Development of Ideologies in Quebec,” in Schultz, Richard et al. (eds.), The Canadian Political Process (3rd ed.; Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1979), 106Google Scholar; originally published as “Sur 1’évolution des idéologies au Québec,” in Revue de I’Institut de Sociologie 1 (1968), 95–124.Google Scholar

24 Posgate, Dale and McRoberts, Kenneth, Quebec: Social Change and Political Crisis (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1976), chap. 5.Google Scholar

25 Quoted in Trudeau, , Federalism and the French Canadians, 110–11.Google Scholar

26 Rioux, , “The Development of Ideologies in Quebec.”Google Scholar

27 Dumont, Fernand, The Vigil of Quebec (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1971), 74.Google Scholar

28 Horowitz, Gad, transcript of Canadian Broadcasting Corporation radio programme, “Viewpoint,” (n.d., 1965).Google Scholar

29 Horowitz, Gad in conversation with George Grant, transcript of Canadian Broadcasting Corporation television programme, “Ideals of Democracy and Social Reality,” January 9, 1966.Google Scholar

30 Hudon, Raymond, “Political Parties and the Polarization of Quebec Politics,” in Thorburn, Hugh G. (ed.), Party Politics in Canada (4th ed.; Scarborough: Prentice-Hall, 1979), 228–42;Google Scholar and Beaud, Jean-Pierre, “The Parti Québécois from René Lévesque to René Levesqué,” in Thorburn, Hugh G. (ed.), Party Politics in Canada (5th ed.; Scarborough: Prentice-Hall, 1985), 238.Google Scholar

31 Lévesque, René, My Quebec (Toronto: Methuen, 1979).Google Scholar

32 See Bourque, Gilles, “Class, Nation, and the Parti Québécois,” in Gagnon (ed.), Quebec: State and Society, 124–47;Google Scholar and Niosi, Jorge, “La nouvelle bourgeoisie canadienne-francaise,” Les Cahiers du socialisme 1 (1978).Google Scholar

33 Globe and Mail (Toronto), November 6, 1987.Google Scholar

34 Ibid., October 5, 1987.

35 Truman, Tom, “A Critique of Seymour M. Lipset's Article ‘Value Differences, Absolute or Relative: The English-speaking Democracies,’ ” this Journal 4 (1971), 497–525.Google Scholar